IP Library Granted Patent US 8,571,253
Granted Patent B2
US 8,571,253 · App. 12/642,231 · Granted Oct 29, 2013

Image quality evaluation device and method

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,571,253
App. No.
12/642,231
Granted
Oct 29, 2013
Kind
B2
Abstract

An image quality evaluation device is disclosed in the present invention, including: an image analyzer, adapted to analyze the parameters of an image to obtain parameter values; and an evaluation unit, adapted to evaluate the quality of an image based on parameter values in line with the predetermined standard and generate the evaluation result. An image quality evaluation method is disclosed in the present invention, including: analyze the parameters of an image to obtain parameter values; and evaluate the quality of an image based on parameter values in line with the predetermined standard and generate the evaluation result. An image quality evaluation device and method provided in the present invention are used to analyze the parameters of an image with the image recognition technology to obtain parameter values and then generate the parameter values in line with the predetermined standard. In this way, the photo quality can be evaluated automatically in the present invention to decrease the exhausted manpower and improve the entertainment function.

Claims (29)

1. An image quality evaluation device, comprising:

an image analyzer configured to analyze parameters of an image to obtain parameter values; and

an evaluation unit configured to evaluate quality of the image based on the parameter values according to a predetermined standard and generate an evaluation result,

wherein the image analyzer comprises a precision analyzer configured to obtain a precision of the image,

wherein the precision of the image comprises an amount of pixels in the image,

wherein the evaluation unit comprises a precision evaluation unit configured to evaluate the precision of the image by comparing the precision obtained by the precision analyzer to a predetermined standard precision value,

wherein the predetermined standard precision value comprises a preset amount of pixels, and

wherein the evaluation unit is configured to:

compare the amount of pixels in the image to the preset amount of pixels to determine whether the amount of pixels in the image is greater than or less than the preset amount of pixels;

determine that the quality of the image is acceptable when the amount of pixels in the image is greater than the preset amount of pixels; and

determine that the quality of the image is unacceptable when the amount of pixels in the image is less than the preset amount of pixels.

2. The image quality evaluation device according to claim 1 , wherein the image analyzer further comprises at least one of: a color analyzer, a position analyzer, a layout analyzer, and a definition analyzer, wherein each analyzer is respectively configured to analyze a color, a person position, a layout, and a definition of the image to obtain the respective parameter values, wherein the evaluation unit further comprises at least one of: a color evaluation unit, a position evaluation unit, a layout evaluation unit, and a definition evaluation unit, and wherein each evaluation unit is respectively configured to evaluate the parameter values of the color, the person position, the layout, and the definition of the image to generate the respective evaluation results.

3. The image quality evaluation device according to claim 2 , wherein the evaluation result generated by each evaluation unit includes numerical values that are determined by a uniform point scale.

4. The image quality evaluation device according to claim 3 , further comprising a weight arithmetic unit configured to calculate the numerical values generated by each evaluation unit in the uniform point scale according to a predetermined weight, and generate a weighted calculation result as a comprehensive evaluation result.

5. An image quality evaluation method, comprising:

analyzing parameters of an image to obtain parameter values;

evaluating a quality of the image based on the parameter values according to a predetermined standard; and

generating an evaluation result,

wherein analyzing the parameters of the image includes obtaining a precision of the image,

wherein the precision of the image comprises an amount of pixels in the image,

wherein evaluating the quality of the image includes evaluating the precision of the image by comparing the precision of the image to a predetermined standard precision value,

wherein the predetermined standard precision value comprises a preset amount of pixels, and

wherein evaluating the quality of the image comprises:

comparing the amount of pixels in the image to the preset amount of pixels to determine whether the amount of pixels in the image is greater than or less than the preset amount of pixels;

determining that the quality of the image is acceptable when the amount of pixels in the image is greater than the preset amount of pixels; and

determining that the quality of the image is unacceptable when the amount of pixels in the image is less than the preset amount of pixels.

6. The image quality evaluation method according to claim 5 , wherein analyzing the parameters of the image further includes at least one of: a color analysis, a position analysis, a layout analysis, and a definition analysis, wherein each analysis is respectively related to analyzing a color, a person position, a layout, and a definition, to obtain the respective parameter values, wherein evaluating the quality of the image further includes at least one of: a color evaluation, a position evaluation, a layout evaluation, and a definition evaluation, and wherein each evaluation is respectively related to evaluating the parameter values of the color, the person position, the layout, and the definition of the image, and generating the respective evaluation results.

7. The image quality evaluation method according to claim 6 , wherein the evaluation result generated in each type of evaluation includes numerical values determined by a uniform point scale.

8. The image quality evaluation method according to claim 7 , further comprising calculating the numerical values generated in each type of evaluation in the uniform point scale according to a predetermined weight, and generating a weighted calculation result as a comprehensive evaluation result.

Assignments (4)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 19, 2018
From: HUAWEI DEVICE (SHENZHEN) CO., LTD.
To: HUAWEI DEVICE CO., LTD.
Reel/Frame 047603/0039 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Jun 12, 2018
From: HUAWEI DEVICE CO.,LTD.
To: HUAWEI DEVICE (SHENZHEN) CO., LTD.
Reel/Frame 046340/0590 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Jan 29, 2010
From: SHENZHEN HUAWEI COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD.
To: HUAWEI DEVICE CO., LTD.
Reel/Frame 023871/0290 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 21, 2009
From: YAO, HONGJIE
To: HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD.
Reel/Frame 023682/0077 →