IP Library Granted Patent US 8,024,447
Granted Patent B1
US 8,024,447 · App. 12/650,200 · Granted Sep 20, 2011

Traffic estimation

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,024,447
App. No.
12/650,200
Granted
Sep 20, 2011
Kind
B1
Abstract

Methods, systems, and articles of manufacture of the present invention may assist in planning, execution, and evaluation of advertising campaigns on the Internet. Particularly, methods, systems, and articles of manufacture of the present invention may help evaluate and/or predict traffic volume on the Internet. An exemplary method for predicting traffic may comprise receiving historical traffic data for a location, and computing a prediction of traffic volume for a particular time at the location using the historical traffic data and at least one prediction algorithm.

Claims (47)

1. A method comprising:

comparing, via one or more processors, a predictability of traffic for a first location and a predictability of traffic for a second location; and

generating, via the one or more processors, an advertising campaign for at least the first location,

wherein generating the advertising campaign for the first location is based at least in part on the predictability of traffic for the first location.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the generating of the advertising campaign for the first location comprises

selecting the first location for delivery of advertisements in the advertising campaign based at least in part on the predictability of traffic for the first location.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first location is a website.

4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising

determining the predictability of traffic for the second location.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the generating of the advertising campaign for the first location is based at least in part on the comparison of the predictability of traffic for the first location and the predictability of traffic for the second location.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first location is a first website and the second location is a second website.

7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising

receiving historical traffic data for the first location, and

observing traffic volume data from the first location,

wherein the determining of the predictability of traffic for the first location is based at least in part on the historical traffic data for the first location and the observed traffic volume data from the first location.

8. A method comprising:

generating an advertising campaign for at least a first location;

conducting the advertising campaign for the first location;

determining a predictability of traffic for the first location;

comparing, via one or more processors, the predictability of traffic for the first location and a predictability of traffic for a second location; and

adjusting, via the one or more processors, an advertisement delivery schedule of the advertising campaign for the first location based at least in part on the predictability of traffic for the first location.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein the first location is a website.

10. The method of claim 8 , further comprising

determining the predictability of traffic for the second location.

11. The method of claim 8 , wherein the adjusting of the advertisement delivery schedule of the advertising campaign for the first location is based at least in part on the comparison of the predictability of traffic for the first location and the predictability of traffic for the second location.

12. The method of claim 8 , further comprising

adjusting an advertisement delivery schedule for the second location based at least in part on the comparison of the predictability of traffic for the first location and the predictability of traffic for the second location.

13. The method of claim 8 , wherein the first location is a first website and the second location is a second website.

14. The method of claim 8 , further comprising

receiving historical traffic data for the location, and

observing traffic volume data from the location,

wherein the determining of the predictability of traffic for the location is based at least in part on the historical traffic data for the location and the observed traffic volume data from the location.

15. A method comprising:

generating an advertising campaign for at least one location;

receiving historical traffic data for the location;

computing, via one or more processors, a prediction of traffic volume for a particular time at the location using the historical traffic data;

conducting the advertising campaign for the location;

receiving observed traffic volume data for the particular time at the location;

comparing, via the one or more processors, the prediction of traffic volume with the observed traffic volume data;

computing, via the one or more processors, a predictability score for the location from the comparison; and

adjusting, via the one or more processors, an advertisement delivery schedule of the advertising campaign for the location based at least in part on the predictability score for the location.

16. The method of claim 15 , wherein the particular time at the location is a particular hour of day at the location and the computing of the prediction of traffic volume uses historical hourly traffic data from the same particular hour over a plurality of days.

17. The method of claim 15 , wherein the location is a first location, and the adjusting of the advertisement delivery schedule comprises scheduling delivery of an advertisement in the campaign to a second location based on the predictability score for the first location.

18. The method of claim 15 , wherein the location is a first location and the predictability score is a first predictability score, the method further comprising:

computing a second predictability score for a second location; and

comparing the first predictability score and the second predictability score,

wherein the adjusting of the advertisement delivery schedule comprises scheduling delivery of an advertisement in the campaign to the second location based on the comparison of the first predictability score and the second predictability score.

Assignments (6)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 9, 2014
From: MICROSOFT CORPORATION
To: MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, LLC
Reel/Frame 034564/0001 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE ASSIGNOR AND THE DOC DATE, IDENTIFIED ON THE ATTACHED SHEETS. PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 029317 FRAME 0861. PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 029317 FRAME 0861. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE INCORRECT ASSIGNOR AND DOCUMENT DATE OF PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ASSIGNMENT.. Recorded Jan 9, 2013
From: AOL ADVERTISING INC.
To: MICROSOFT CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 029598/0108 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 19, 2012
From: AOL INC.
To: MICROSOFT CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 029317/0861 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 30, 2009
From: GARCIA-FRANCO, JOSE CARLOS; RAINES, TAYLOR; KAMPRATH, MICHAEL F.; LUENBERGER, ROB
To: ADVERTISING.COM
Reel/Frame 023719/0486 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Dec 30, 2009
From: ADVERTISING.COM
To: PLATFORM-A INC.
Reel/Frame 023721/0376 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Dec 30, 2009
From: PLATFORM-A INC.
To: AOL ADVERTISING INC.
Reel/Frame 023721/0424 →