IP Library Granted Patent US 8,832,699
Granted Patent B2
US 8,832,699 · App. 12/651,876 · Granted Sep 9, 2014

Migrating processes operating on one platform to another platform in a multi-platform system

Inventor: Mark Neft (Caldwell, NJ)
Assignee: Accenture Global Services Limited
G06F9/4856
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,832,699
App. No.
12/651,876
Granted
Sep 9, 2014
Kind
B2
Abstract

Embodiments of the claimed subject matter are directed to methods and a system that allows the optimization of processes operating on a multi-platform system (such as a mainframe) by migrating certain processes operating on one platform to another platform in the system. In one embodiment, optimization is performed by evaluating the processes executing in a partition operating under a proprietary operating system, determining a collection of processes from the processes to be migrated, calculating a cost of migration for migrating the collection of processes, prioritizing the collection of processes in an order of migration and incrementally migrating the processes according to the order of migration to another partition in the mainframe executing a lower cost (e.g., open-source) operating system.

Claims (50)

1. A computer-implemented method comprising:

evaluating, in a multi-platform system that comprises a plurality of logical partitions, a candidacy of a plurality of processes executing in a first platform of the system for migration to a second platform of the system, wherein the first platform comprises a first operating system executing in the first logical partition, and the second platform comprises a different, second operating system executing in the second logical partition of the plurality of logical partitions;

based at least on evaluating the candidacy of the plurality of processes, selecting a subset of the processes to be migrated from the first platform to the second platform;

determining a cost of migrating each of the processes of the subset;

determining a migration priority of each of the processes of the subset based at least on the respective cost of migration of each process of the subset; and

migrating a particular process of the subset from the first platform to the second platform in an order that is based at least on the migration priority of the particular process.

2. The method of claim 1 , comprising:

after migrating the particular process, incrementally migrating another process of the subset from the first platform to the second platform in an order that is based at least on the migration priority of the other process.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein evaluating a candidacy of the plurality of processes comprises determining whether the particular process is specific to the first platform.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein selecting a subset of the processes comprises selecting a subset of the processes that are determined to be not specific to the first platform.

5. The method of claim 1 , comprising:

determining (i) an amount of processing required by a central processing unit of the multi-platform system to perform the particular process, (ii) a number of operands included in source code corresponding to the particular process, or (iii) a number of dependencies corresponding to the particular process,

wherein the cost for migrating the particular process is based at least on (i) the amount of processing required by a central processing unit of the multi-platform system to perform the particular process, (ii) the number of operands included in source code corresponding to the particular process, or (iii) the number of dependencies corresponding to the particular process.

6. The method of claim 5 , wherein determining a number of dependencies corresponding to the particular process comprises estimating a number of operations performed with one or more other processes by the particular process.

7. The method of claim 5 , wherein determining a migration priority of each of the processes comprises assigning (i) a first priority to the particular process if the cost of migration for the particular process does not satisfy a threshold, or (ii) a second, lower priority to the particular process if the cost of migration for the particular process does satisfy a threshold.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first platform comprises a proprietary platform corresponding to a type of the multi-platform system, and wherein the second platform comprises a platform that is non-proprietary to the type of the multi-platform system.

9. A system comprising:

one or more computers;

a computer-readable medium coupled to the one or more computers having instructions stored thereon which, when executed by the one or more computers, cause the one or more computers to perform operations comprising:

evaluating, in a multi-platform system that comprises a plurality of logical partitions, a candidacy of a plurality of processes executing in a first platform of the system for migration to a second platform of the system, wherein the first platform comprises a first operating system executing in the first logical partition, and the second platform comprises a different, second operating system executing in the second logical partition of the plurality of logical partitions;

based at least on evaluating the candidacy of the plurality of processes, selecting a subset of the processes to be migrated from the first platform to the second platform;

determining a cost of migrating each of the processes of the subset;

determining a migration priority of each of the processes of the subset based at least on the respective cost of migration of each process of the subset; and

migrating a particular process of the subset from the first platform to the second platform in an order that is based at least on the migration priority of the particular process.

10. The system of claim 9 , wherein the operations comprise:

after migrating the particular process, incrementally migrating another process of the subset from the first platform to the second platform in an order that is based at least on the migration priority of the other process.

11. The system of claim 9 , wherein evaluating a candidacy of the plurality of processes comprises determining whether the particular process is specific to the first platform.

12. The system of claim 9 , wherein selecting a subset of the processes comprises selecting a subset of the processes that are determined to be not specific to the first platform.

13. The system of claim 9 , wherein the operations comprise:

determining (i) an amount of processing required by a central processing unit of the multi-platform system to perform the particular process, (ii) a number of operands included in source code corresponding to the particular process, or (iii) a number of dependencies corresponding to the particular process,

wherein the cost for migrating the particular process is based at least on (i) the amount of processing required by a central processing unit of the multi-platform system to perform the particular process, (ii) the number of operands included in source code corresponding to the particular process, or (iii) the number of dependencies corresponding to the particular process.

14. The system of claim 13 , wherein determining a number of dependencies corresponding to the particular process comprises estimating a number of operations performed with one or more other processes by the particular process.

15. The system of claim 13 , wherein determining a migration priority of each of the processes comprises assigning (i) a first priority to the particular process if the cost of migration for the particular process does not satisfy a threshold, or (ii) a second, lower priority to the particular process if the cost of migration for the particular process does satisfy a threshold.

16. The system of claim 9 , wherein the first platform comprises a proprietary platform corresponding to a type of the multi-platform system, and wherein the second platform comprises a platform that is non-proprietary to the type of the multi-platform system.

17. A non-transitory computer-readable medium encoded with a computer program comprising instructions that, when executed, operate to cause a computer to perform operations comprising:

evaluating, in a multi-platform system that comprises a plurality of logical partitions, a candidacy of a plurality of processes executing in a first platform of the system for migration to a second platform of the system, wherein the first platform comprises a first operating system executing in the first logical partition, and the second platform comprises a different, second operating system executing in the second logical partition of the plurality of logical partitions;

based at least on evaluating the candidacy of the plurality of processes, selecting a subset of the processes to be migrated from the first platform to the second platform;

determining a cost of migrating each of the processes of the subset;

determining a migration priority of each of the processes of the subset based at least on the respective cost of migration of each process of the subset; and

migrating a particular process of the subset from the first platform to the second platform in an order that is based at least on the migration priority of the particular process.

18. The medium of claim 17 , wherein the operations comprise:

after migrating the particular process, incrementally migrating another process of the subset from the first platform to the second platform in an order that is based at least on the migration priority of the other process.

19. The medium of claim 17 , wherein evaluating a candidacy of the plurality of processes comprises determining whether the particular process is specific to the first platform.

20. The medium of claim 17 , wherein selecting a subset of the processes comprises selecting a subset of the processes that are determined to be not specific to the first platform.

21. The medium of claim 17 , wherein the operations comprise:

determining (i) an amount of processing required by a central processing unit of the multi-platform system to perform the particular process, (ii) a number of operands included in source code corresponding to the particular process, or (iii) a number of dependencies corresponding to the particular process,

wherein the cost for migrating the particular process is based at least on (i) the amount of processing required by a central processing unit of the multi-platform system to perform the particular process, (ii) the number of operands included in source code corresponding to the particular process, or (iii) the number of dependencies corresponding to the particular process.

22. The medium of claim 21 , wherein determining a number of dependencies corresponding to the particular process comprises estimating a number of operations performed with one or more other processes by the particular process.

23. The medium of claim 21 , wherein determining a migration priority of each of the processes comprises assigning (i) a first priority to the particular process if the cost of migration for the particular process does not satisfy a threshold, or (ii) a second, lower priority to the particular process if the cost of migration for the particular process does satisfy a threshold.

24. The medium of claim 17 , wherein the first platform comprises a proprietary platform corresponding to a type of the multi-platform system, and wherein the second platform comprises a platform that is non-proprietary to the type of the multi-platform system.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 26, 2011
From: ACCENTURE GLOBAL SERVICES GMBH
To: ACCENTURE GLOBAL SERVICES LIMITED
Reel/Frame 025700/0287 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 5, 2010
From: NEFT, MARK
To: ACCENTURE GLOBAL SERVICES GMBH
Reel/Frame 023736/0933 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 61177149 · May 11, 2009
Related Publication 20100287560A1 · Nov 11, 2010