IP Library Granted Patent US 8,365,216
Granted Patent B2
US 8,365,216 · App. 12/660,168 · Granted Jan 29, 2013

Video stream modification to defeat detection

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,365,216
App. No.
12/660,168
Granted
Jan 29, 2013
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method and system for detecting automatic ad detection is presented in which video streams are modified such that features cannot be automatically recognized or statistical parameters and fingerprints derived from the video stream cannot be matched against fingerprints of known video segments in a database.

Claims (26)

1. A method of altering an image to prevent the detection of the image, the method comprising:

receiving the image;

identifying a plurality of types of modifications to be made to the image, the modifications, when applied, causing a spatial alteration of the image;

randomly selecting a first type of the types of modifications; and

altering at least a portion of the image by applying the randomly selected first type of modification to the image, wherein the altering reduces the ability to detect the image.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the altering at least a portion of the image includes varying a portion of the image with static content.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the altering at least a portion of the image includes varying a set of pixels to alter a color histogram associated with image.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the altering at least a portion of the image includes varying a set of pixels to alter a color coherence vector associated with the image.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of types of modifications includes at least one of staling, shifting, cropping, rotation, stretching and warping of the image.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the spatial modification does not perceivably degrade the image quality.

7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

analyzing the altered image to determine if the altered image has been sufficiently altered to reduce the ability to detect the image.

8. A method of altering at least one image of a series of images to prevent the detection of the series of images, the method comprising:

receiving the series of images;

identifying a plurality of types of modifications to be made to at least one image of the series of images, the modifications, when applied, causing a spatial alteration of the at least one image;

selecting at least two of the types of modifications;

randomly selecting at least a first and a second image of the series of images; and

altering at least a portion of the first image by applying one of the at least two types of modifications and altering at least a portion of the second image by applying a different of the at least two types of modifications, wherein the altering reduces the ability to detect the series of images.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein the altering at least a portion of at least the first image or the second image includes varying a portion that includes static content.

10. The method of claim 8 , wherein the altering at least a portion of at least the first image or the second image includes varying a set of pixels to alter a color histogram associated with the image.

11. The method of claim 8 , wherein the altering at least a portion of at least the first image or the second image includes varying a set of pixels to alter a color coherence vector associated with the image.

12. The method of claim 8 , wherein the series of images are frames of a video.

13. The method of claim 8 , wherein the plurality of types of modifications includes at least one of scaling, shifting, cropping, rotation, stretching and warping of the image.

14. The method of claim 8 , wherein the spatial modification does not perceivably degrade the image quality.

15. The method of claim 8 , further comprising:

analyzing at least one of the altered images to determine if it has been sufficiently altered to reduce the ability to detect the series of images.

Assignments (10)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Oct 26, 2020
From: JEFFERIES FINANCE LLC
To: RPX CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 054486/0422 →
PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Oct 23, 2020
From: RPX CLEARINGHOUSE LLC; RPX CORPORATION
To: BARINGS FINANCE LLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 054198/0029 →
PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Oct 23, 2020
From: RPX CLEARINGHOUSE LLC; RPX CORPORATION
To: BARINGS FINANCE LLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 054244/0566 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jun 29, 2018
From: RPX CORPORATION
To: JEFFERIES FINANCE LLC
Reel/Frame 046486/0433 →
RELEASE (REEL 038041 / FRAME 0001) Recorded Jan 2, 2018
From: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
To: RPX CORPORATION; RPX CLEARINGHOUSE LLC
Reel/Frame 044970/0030 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Mar 9, 2016
From: RPX CORPORATION; RPX CLEARINGHOUSE LLC
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 038041/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 27, 2015
From: VIDEO IDENTIFICATION DISCOVERIES, LLC
To: RPX CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 035278/0857 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 19, 2013
From: TECHNOLOGY, PATENTS & LICENSING, INC.
To: VIDEO IDENTIFICATION DISCOVERIES, LLC
Reel/Frame 031819/0893 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 29, 2010
From: LIENHART, RAINER W; ELDERING, CHARLES A; KONIG, RICHARD
To: TECHNOLOGY, PATENTS & LICENSING, INC.
Reel/Frame 024150/0284 →
APOSTILLED ASSIGNMENT Recorded Mar 29, 2010
From: LIENHART, RAINER W.
To: TECHNOLOGY, PATENTS & LICENSING, INC.
Reel/Frame 024150/0401 →