IP Library Granted Patent US 8,373,576
Granted Patent B2
US 8,373,576 · App. 12/684,637 · Granted Feb 12, 2013

Wireless sensor network with variable priority

Inventor: Charles Fred Strohm (Jenks, OK)
Assignee: Murphy Wireless, LLC
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,373,576
App. No.
12/684,637
Granted
Feb 12, 2013
Kind
B2
Abstract

A system for wirelessly monitoring a plurality of parameters is disclosed. A first remote transceiver is attached to at least one first sensor for monitoring one of the parameters and a second remote transceiver is attached to at least one second sensor for monitoring another of said parameters. The system includes a base station transceiver. The first and second remote transceivers reach periodically report normal operating conditions to the base station transceiver. The first remote transceiver reports abnormal sensor readings with no substantial delay after occurrence. The second remote transceiver reports abnormal sensor readings a predetermined length of time after occurrence.

Claims (35)

1. A system for event monitoring, comprising:

a remote sensor;

a remote transceiver interfaced to the remote sensor; and

a base transceiver that selectively wirelessly communicates with the remote transceiver;

wherein the remote transceiver provides a periodic communication to the base transceiver that is indicative of a nominal operating condition and the periodic communication is acknowledged by the base transceiver;

wherein the remote transceiver operates in a first fail safe mode when the periodic communication acknowledgement is not received by the remote transceiver, the first fail safe mode comprising changing a channel for receiving the acknowledgement and retransmitting the periodic communication at a higher power than the first transmission of the periodic communication;

wherein the remote transceiver selectively provides an event notification communication to the base transceiver that is indicative of the occurrence of a monitored event; and

wherein the remote transceiver delays a predetermined length of time between detecting the event and providing the event to the base transceiver.

2. The system of claim 1 , further comprising:

a second remote transceiver that provides a periodic communication to the base transceiver that is indicative of a nominal operating condition and the periodic communication is acknowledged by the base transceiver;

wherein the second remotes transceiver selectively provides an event notification communication to the base transceiver that is indicative of the occurrence of a second monitored event; and

wherein the second remote transceiver delays a second predetermined length of time between detecting the second event and providing the second event to the base transceiver.

3. The system of claim 2 , wherein the first remote transceiver has a higher priority and a shorter predetermined delay that the second remote transceiver that has a lower priority and a longer predetermined delay.

4. The system of claim 1 , wherein the remote transceiver transmits on a high priority channel until detecting interference on the high priority channel and then switches to a second high priority channel for transmitting.

5. The system of claim 1 , wherein, upon detecting interference, the base transceiver and the remote transceiver search for a channel with minimal interference across a frequency hopping spread spectrum group of channels.

6. A system for wirelessly monitoring a plurality of parameters, comprising:

a first remote transceiver attached to at least one first sensor for monitoring one of the parameters;

a second remote transceiver attached to at least one second sensor for monitoring another of the parameters; and

a base station transceiver;

wherein the first and second remote transceivers reach periodically report normal operating conditions to the base station transceiver and the periodic report is acknowledged by the base station transceiver;

wherein the remote transceivers operate in a first fail safe mode when the periodic communication acknowledgement is not received by the remote transceiver, the first fail safe mode comprising changing a channel for receiving the acknowledgement and retransmitting the periodic communication at a higher power than the first transmission of the periodic communication;

wherein the first remote transceiver reports abnormal sensor readings with no substantial delay after occurrence; and

wherein the second remote transceiver reports abnormal sensor readings a predetermined length of time after occurrence.

7. The system of claim 6 , further comprising a third remote transceiver that reports abnormal sensor readings a second predetermined length of time after occurrence.

8. A method comprising:

providing a plurality of remote transceivers that monitor one or more parameters;

providing a base station transceiver; and

providing at least two priority levels, each priority level having at least one remote transceiver assigned thereto;

wherein the plurality of remote transceivers each provide a periodic communication to the base station transceiver to report nominal operating condition and the periodic communication is acknowledged by the base station transceiver;

wherein the plurality of remote transceivers each operate in a first fail safe mode when the periodic communication acknowledgement is not received by the remote transceiver, the first fail safe mode comprising changing a channel for receiving the acknowledgement and retransmitting the periodic communication at a higher power than the first transmission of the periodic communication; and

wherein upon detecting an abnormal parameter reading, the plurality of remote transceivers delay a predetermined length of time before attempting to establish communication with the base station transceiver, the delay being shorter for a remote transceiver assigned a higher priority that that or a remote transceiver assigned a lower priority.

9. The method of claim 8 , further comprising assigning at least one remote transceiver to a highest priority level, the highest priority level having no predetermined substantial delay between detection of an abnormal parameter and attempting to establish communication with the base transceiver.

10. The method of claim 8 , further comprising changing a communication channel of the remote transceiver and the bases station transceiver whenever a substantial amount of interference is detected on the communication channel.

11. The method of claim 10 , wherein the changed channel is selected based on a frequency hopping spread spectrum basis.

12. The method of claim 10 , further comprising monitoring the original communication channel and returning to it when the interference has subsided below a predetermined threshold.

Assignments (7)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 9, 2024
From: FW MURPHY PRODUCTION CONTROLS, LLC
To: INPRO/SEAL LLC
Reel/Frame 066070/0393 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Jul 9, 2020
From: MURPHY INDUSTRIES, LLC
To: FW MURPHY PRODUCTION CONTROLS, LLC
Reel/Frame 053171/0913 →
RELEASE Recorded Dec 6, 2016
From: BOKF, NA DBA BANK OF OKLAHOMA, AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
To: ENOVATION CONTROLS, LLC
Reel/Frame 040821/0431 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 29, 2016
From: ENOVATION CONTROLS, LLC
To: MURPHY INDUSTRIES, LLC
Reel/Frame 040452/0751 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Oct 17, 2014
From: ENOVATION CONTROLS, LLC
To: BOKF, NA DBA BANK OF OKLAHOMA, AS ADMIN. AGENT
Reel/Frame 034013/0158 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 18, 2014
From: MURPHY WIRELESS, LLC
To: ENOVATION CONTROLS, LLC
Reel/Frame 033766/0667 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 8, 2010
From: STROHM, CHARLES FRED
To: MURPHY WIRELESS, LLC
Reel/Frame 024954/0694 →
Continuity (2)
Continuation In Part 12425829 · Apr 17, 2009
Related Publication 20100109853A1 · May 6, 2010