IP Library Granted Patent US 8,296,176
Granted Patent B1
US 8,296,176 · App. 12/688,184 · Granted Oct 23, 2012

Matching visitors as leads to lead buyers

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,296,176
App. No.
12/688,184
Granted
Oct 23, 2012
Kind
B1
Abstract

In one embodiment, a method includes accessing information regarding a visitor to a website; accessing a plurality of filters that are each associated with one of a plurality of lead buyers and being defined by a set of lead criteria specified by the associated lead buyer; and, for each of the filters, determining whether the information regarding the visitor satisfies the set of lead criteria defining the filter and, if the information regarding the visitor satisfies the set of lead criteria defining the filter, selecting the filter as a filter for which the visitor qualifies as a lead. The method includes, for each of the filters for which the visitor qualifies as a lead, accessing information indicating a potential revenue to be obtained by a lead matcher from the lead buyer associated with the filter.

Claims (105)

1. A method comprising:

accessing, by one or more computer systems, information regarding a visitor to a website;

accessing, by the one or more computer systems, a plurality of filters, each of the filters being associated with one of a plurality of lead buyers and being defined by a set of lead criteria specified by the associated lead buyer;

selecting, by the one or more computer systems, at least one of the filters for which the visitor qualifies as a lead, comprising:

for each of the filters:

determining, by the one or more computer systems, whether the information regarding the visitor satisfies the set of lead criteria defining the filter; and

when the information regarding the visitor satisfies the set of lead criteria defining the filter, selecting, by the one or more computer systems, the filter as a filter for which the visitor qualifies as a lead;

for each of the filters for which the visitor qualifies as a lead, accessing, by the one or more computer systems, information indicating a potential revenue to be obtained by a lead matcher from the lead buyer associated with the filter, the potential revenue being computed using at least:

a filter value for the filter representing an amount per lead generated from the filter to be paid by the lead buyer associated with the filter to the lead matcher;

a match-sent ratio for the filter representing a proportion of visitors matched to the filter actually sold as leads to the lead buyer associated with the filter by the lead matcher;

a reject-lead rate for the filter representing a proportion of visitors offered by the lead matcher for sale as leads to the lead buyer associated with the filter whom the lead buyer rejects; and

a return-lead rate for the filter representing a proportion of visitors whom the lead buyer associated with the filter buys as leads from the lead matcher but later returns;

comparing, by the one or more computer systems, the potential revenues to be obtained by the lead matcher from the lead buyers associated with the filters for which the visitor qualifies as a lead with each other; and

based on the comparison, selecting, by the one or more computer systems, one or more particular ones of the filters for which the visitor qualifies as a lead as filters to which to match the visitor.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein for each of the filters, the match-sent ratio, the reject-lead rate, and the return-lead rate are estimated based on one or more statistical models.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein, for each of the filters:

the statistical models estimating the match-sent ratio employ a Bayesian credibility or hierarchical Bayes approach or a discrete choice model; and

the statistical models estimating the reject-lead rate and the return-lead rate are one or more feature-based statistical models.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the potential revenue to be obtained by the lead matcher from the lead buyer associated with a filter for which the visitor qualifies as a lead is further based on the maximum number of leads that the lead buyer has committed to buy over a particular time period.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the potential revenue to be obtained by the lead matcher from the lead buyer associated with a filter for which the visitor qualifies as a lead is further based on a quality of the visitors previously sold to the lead buyer as leads.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the information regarding the visitor comprises information associated with the visitor or information submitted by the visitor via one or more web pages of the website.

7. The method of claim 6 , further comprising presenting an advertisement to the visitor, wherein the information regarding the visitor further comprises the advertisement presented to the visitor.

8. The method of claim 1 , further comprising selling some or all of the information regarding the visitor as a lead to the one or more lead buyers associated with the filters to which the visitor has been matched.

9. The system of claim 8 , further comprising transmitting the information regarding the visitor to the lead buyers to whom the lead is being sold.

10. The method of claim 1 , further comprising, for each of the filters to which the visitor is matched:

presenting the filter to the visitor by identifying on a web page of the website the lead buyer associated with the filter;

soliciting information from the visitor concerning the visitor's level of interest in the filter presented to the visitor; and

receiving information from the visitor concerning the visitor's level of interest in the filter presented to the visitor.

11. The method of claim 10 , further comprising selling some or all of the information regarding the visitor as a lead to the one or more lead buyers associated with the filters to which the visitor has been matched and which the visitor has selected.

12. The method of claim 11 , further comprising transmitting the information regarding the visitor to the lead buyers to whom the lead is being sold.

13. A system comprising:

a memory comprising instructions executable by one or more processors; and

one or more processors coupled to the memory and operable to execute the instructions, the one or more processors being operable when executing the instructions to:

access information regarding a visitor to a website;

access a plurality of filters, each of the filters being associated with one of a plurality of lead buyers and being defined by a set of lead criteria specified by the associated lead buyer;

select at least one of the filters for which the visitor qualifies as a lead, comprising:

for each of the filters:

determine whether the information regarding the visitor satisfies the set of lead criteria defining the filter; and

when the information regarding the visitor satisfies the set of lead criteria defining the filter, select the filter as a filter for which the visitor qualifies as a lead;

for each of the filters for which the visitor qualifies as a lead, access information indicating a potential revenue to be obtained by a lead matcher from the lead buyer associated with the filter, the potential revenue being computed using at least:

a filter value for the filter representing an amount per lead generated from the filter to be paid by the lead buyer associated with the filter to the lead matcher;

a match-sent ratio for the filter representing a proportion of visitors matched to the filter actually sold as leads to the lead buyer associated with the filter by the lead matcher;

a reject-lead rate for the filter representing a proportion of visitors offered by the lead matcher for sale as leads to the lead buyer associated with the filter whom the lead buyer rejects; and

a return-lead rate for the filter representing a proportion of visitors whom the lead buyer associated with the filter buys as leads from the lead matcher but later returns;

compare the potential revenues to be obtained by the lead matcher from the lead buyers associated with the filters for which the visitor qualifies as a lead with each other; and

based on the comparison, select one or more particular ones of the filters for which the visitor qualifies as a lead as filters to which to match the visitor.

14. The system of claim 13 , wherein for each of the filters, the match-sent ratio, the reject-lead rate, and the return-lead rate are estimated based on one or more statistical models.

15. The system of claim 14 , wherein, for each of the filters:

the statistical models estimating the match-sent ratio employ a Bayesian credibility or hierarchical Bayes approach or a discrete choice model; and

the statistical models estimating the reject-lead rate and the return-lead rate are one or more feature-based statistical models.

16. The system of claim 13 , wherein the potential revenue to be obtained by the lead matcher from the lead buyer associated with a filter for which the visitor qualifies as a lead is further based on the maximum number of leads that the lead buyer has committed to buy over a particular time period.

17. The system of claim 13 , wherein the potential revenue to be obtained by the lead matcher from the lead buyer associated with a filter for which the visitor qualifies as a lead is further based on a quality of the visitors previously sold to the lead buyer as leads.

18. The system of claim 13 , wherein the information regarding the visitor comprises information associated with the visitor or information submitted by the visitor via one or more web pages of the website.

19. The system of claim 18 , wherein the processors are further operable when executing the instructions to present an advertisement to the visitor, wherein the information regarding the visitor further comprises the advertisement presented to the visitor.

20. The system of claim 13 , wherein the processors are further operable when executing the instructions to sell some or all of the information regarding the visitor as a lead to the one or more lead buyers associated with the filters to which the visitor has been matched.

21. The system of claim 20 , wherein the processors are further operable when executing the instructions to transmit the information regarding the visitor to the lead buyers to whom the lead is being sold.

22. The system of claim 13 , wherein the processors are further operable when executing the instructions, for each of the filters to which the visitor is matched, to:

present the filter to the visitor by identifying on a web page of the website the lead buyer associated with the filter;

solicit information from the visitor concerning the visitor's level of interest in the filter presented to the visitor; and

receive information from the visitor concerning the visitor's level of interest in the filter presented to the visitor.

23. The system of claim 22 , wherein the processors are further operable when executing the instructions to sell some or all of the information regarding the visitor as a lead to the one or more lead buyers associated with the filters to which the visitor has been matched and which the visitor has selected.

24. The system of claim 23 , wherein the processors are further operable when executing the instructions to transmit the information regarding the visitor to the lead buyers to whom the lead is being sold.

25. One or more computer-readable storage media possessing structure and embodying software that is operable when executed by one or more computer systems to:

access information regarding a visitor to a website;

access a plurality of filters, each of the filters being associated with one of a plurality of lead buyers and being defined by a set of lead criteria specified by the associated lead buyer;

select at least one of the filters for which the visitor qualifies as a lead, comprising:

for each of the filters:

determine whether the information regarding the visitor satisfies the set of lead criteria defining the filter; and

when the information regarding the visitor satisfies the set of lead criteria defining the filter, select the filter as a filter for which the visitor qualifies as a lead;

for each of the filters for which the visitor qualifies as a lead, access information indicating a potential revenue to be obtained by a lead matcher from the lead buyer associated with the filter, the potential revenue being computed using at least:

a filter value for the filter representing an amount per lead generated from the filter to be paid by the lead buyer associated with the filter to the lead matcher;

a match-sent ratio for the filter representing a proportion of visitors matched to the filter actually sold as leads to the lead buyer associated with the filter by the lead matcher;

a reject-lead rate for the filter representing a proportion of visitors offered by the lead matcher for sale as leads to the lead buyer associated with the filter whom the lead buyer rejects; and

a return-lead rate for the filter representing a proportion of visitors whom the lead buyer associated with the filter buys as leads from the lead matcher but later returns;

compare the potential revenues to be obtained by the lead matcher from the lead buyers associated with the filters for which the visitor qualifies as a lead with each other; and

based on the comparison, select one or more particular ones of the filters for which the visitor qualifies as a lead as filters to which to match the visitor.

26. The media of claim 25 , wherein for each of the filters, the match-sent ratio, the reject-lead rate, and the return-lead rate are estimated based on one or more statistical models.

27. The media of claim 26 , wherein, for each of the filters:

the statistical models estimating the match-sent ratio employ a Bayesian credibility or hierarchical Bayes approach or a discrete choice model; and

the statistical models estimating the reject-lead rate and the return-lead rate are one or more feature-based statistical models.

28. The media of claim 25 , wherein the potential revenue to be obtained by the lead matcher from the lead buyer associated with a filter for which the visitor qualifies as a lead is further based on the maximum number of leads that the lead buyer has committed to buy over a particular time period.

29. The media of claim 25 , wherein the potential revenue to be obtained by the lead matcher from the lead buyer associated with a filter for which the visitor qualifies as a lead is further based on a quality of the visitors previously sold to the lead buyer as leads.

30. The media of claim 25 , wherein the information regarding the visitor comprises information associated with the visitor or information submitted by the visitor via one or more web pages of the website.

31. The media of claim 30 , wherein the software is further operable to present an advertisement to the visitor, wherein the information regarding the visitor further comprises the advertisement presented to the visitor.

32. The media of claim 25 , wherein the software is further operable to sell some or all of the information regarding the visitor as a lead to the one or more lead buyers associated with the filters to which the visitor has been matched.

33. The media of claim 32 , wherein the software is further operable to transmit the information regarding the visitor to the lead buyers to whom the lead is being sold.

34. The media of claim 25 , wherein the software is further operable, for each of the filters to which the visitor is matched, to:

present the filter to the visitor by identifying on a web page of the website the lead buyer associated with the filter;

solicit information from the visitor concerning the visitor's level of interest in the filter presented to the visitor; and

receive information from the visitor concerning the visitor's level of interest in the filter presented to the visitor.

35. The media of claim 34 , wherein the software is further operable to sell some or all of the information regarding the visitor as a lead to the one or more lead buyers associated with the filters to which the visitor has been matched and which the visitor has selected.

36. The media of claim 35 , wherein the software is further operable to transmit the information regarding the visitor to the lead buyers to whom the lead is being sold.

37. A system comprising:

means for accessing information regarding a visitor to a website;

means for accessing a plurality of filters, each of the filters being associated with one of a plurality of lead buyers and being defined by a set of lead criteria specified by the associated lead buyer;

means for, for each of the filters:

determining whether the information regarding the visitor satisfies the set of lead criteria defining the filter; and

when the information regarding the visitor satisfies the set of lead criteria defining the filter, selecting the filter as a filter for which the visitor qualifies as a lead; and

means for, for each of the filters for which the visitor qualifies as a lead, accessing information indicating a potential revenue to be obtained by a lead matcher from the lead buyer associated with the filter, the potential revenue being computed using at least:

a filter value for the filter representing an amount per lead generated from the filter to be paid by the lead buyer associated with the filter to the lead matcher;

a match-sent ratio for the filter representing a proportion of visitors matched to the filter actually sold as leads to the lead buyer associated with the filter by the lead matcher;

a reject-lead rate for the filter representing a proportion of visitors offered by the lead matcher for sale as leads to the lead buyer associated with the filter whom the lead buyer rejects; and

a return-lead rate for the filter representing a proportion of visitors whom the lead buyer associated with the filter buys as leads from the lead matcher but later returns;

means for comparing the potential revenues to be obtained by the lead matcher from the lead buyers associated with the filters for which the visitor qualifies as a lead with each other; and

means for, based on the comparison, selecting one or more particular ones of the filters for which the visitor qualifies as a lead as filters to which to match the visitor.

Assignments (17)
NOTICE OF GRANT OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS Recorded Aug 30, 2024
From: ZETA GLOBAL CORP.; ZSTREAM ACQUISITION LLC
To: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Reel/Frame 068822/0154 →
TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS RECORDED AT REEL 055212, FRAME 0964 Recorded Aug 30, 2024
From: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
To: ZETA GLOBAL CORP.
Reel/Frame 068822/0167 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Mar 2, 2021
From: PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
To: ZETA GLOBAL CORP.
Reel/Frame 055458/0084 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Feb 11, 2021
From: FIRST EAGLE PRIVATE CREDIT, LLC, AS SUCCESSOR TO NEWSTAR FINANCIAL, INC
To: ZBT ACQUISITION CORP.; ZETA GLOBAL CORP.; 935 KOP ASSOCIATES, LLC
Reel/Frame 055282/0276 →
NOTICE OF GRANT OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS Recorded Feb 3, 2021
From: ZETA GLOBAL CORP.
To: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
Reel/Frame 055212/0964 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Dec 3, 2020
From: ZETA GLOBAL CORP.
To: FIRST EAGLE PRIVATE CREDIT, LLC
Reel/Frame 054585/0770 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jul 24, 2017
From: ZETA INTERACTIVE CORP.; ZETA INTERACTIVE, LLC; SPIREVISION HOLDINGS, INC.; ORIGIN INTERACTIVE GROUP, LLC; LEVELOCITY, LLC
To: PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Reel/Frame 043073/0210 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded May 12, 2017
From: ZETA INTERACTIVE CORP.
To: ZETA GLOBAL CORP.
Reel/Frame 042349/0644 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE NATURE OF CONVEYANCE PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 036082 FRAME: 0805. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST. Recorded Jul 17, 2015
From: SILICON VALLEY BANK
To: PLATEAU DATA SERVICES, LLC
Reel/Frame 036128/0963 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 15, 2015
From: PLATEAU DATA SERVICES, LLC
To: ZETA INTERACTIVE CORP.
Reel/Frame 036094/0546 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jul 14, 2015
From: MADISON CAPITAL FUNDING LLC, AS AGENT
To: PLATEAU DATA SERVICES, LLC
Reel/Frame 036082/0266 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jul 14, 2015
From: SILICON VALLEY BANK
To: PLATEAU DATA SERVICES, LLC
Reel/Frame 036082/0805 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO DELETE THE SECOND ASSIGNEE PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 031644 FRAME: 0001. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT. Recorded Jun 11, 2014
From: ADCHEMY, INC.
To: PLATEAU DATA SERVICES, LLC
Reel/Frame 033134/0242 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Feb 3, 2014
From: XL MARKETING HOLDINGS CORP.; XL MARKETING CORP.; WARD MEDIA, INC.; SPIRE VISION HOLDINGS, INC.; EXPERT MARKETING, LLC; CARIDAN MARKETING LABS, INC.; SPIRE VISION LLC; XL EDUCATION CORP.; SERVE CLICKS, LLC; SERVERESULTS, INC.; PROADVERTISERS, LLC; TRANSIT DIRECT, INC.; PRIME ADVERTISERS, LLC; MAPNS, LLC; ZETA INTERACTIVE, LLC; MEDIACTIVATE, LLC; EDUCATION LINK, LLC; ORIGIN INTERACTIVE GROUP, LLC; EXPOSITION MEDIA SERVICES, LLC; LEVELOCITY, LLC; PLATEAU DATA SERVICES, LLC; INTELA ACQUISITION, LLC; VERIAMAIL, LLC; ORION CONTENT MANAGEMENT, LLC; CAIVIS ACQUISITION CORP. II; CAIVIS ACQUISITION CORP. III; CONSUMER VALUE PARTNERS, LLC; STERLING INTERACTIVE MARKETING CORP.; DIGITAL PUBLISHING CORPORATION; ONPOINT COMMUNICATIONS LLC; CPA DETECTIVE, LLC; CAIVIS ACQUISITION CORP. IV; CLICKSQUARED, INC.; CT HOLDING CORPORATION
To: SILICON VALLEY BANK, AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Reel/Frame 032153/0097 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Nov 26, 2013
From: PLATEAU DATA SERVICES, LLC
To: MADISON CAPITAL FUNDING LLC, AS AGENT
Reel/Frame 031728/0844 →
ASSET PURCHASE AGREEMENT Recorded Nov 14, 2013
From: ADCHEMY, INC.
To: PLATEAU DATA SERVICES, LLC; XL MARKETING CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 031644/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 15, 2010
From: CHATWIN, RICHARD EDWARD; NA, STEVE
To: ADCHEMY, INC.
Reel/Frame 023795/0736 →