Deterministic switching protection over aggregated links
View Patent ↗An apparatus and method for improving network efficiency during an automatic switchover are disclosed. Upon receipt of a switching request from a first network peer (“NP”) transmitted via a connection containing multiple links, a process capable of providing automatic switchover protection (“ASP”), in one embodiment, bring down all or multiple links simultaneously at the second NP in response to the switching request. When the links are ready to be brought up in accordance with APS pending state, the process temporarily suppresses network alarms to avoid higher level entities from entering link reset renegotiations.
1. A method for automatic switchover in a network, comprising:
receiving a switching request from a first network peer (“NP”) transmitted via a connection containing multiple links;
bringing down a plurality of links simultaneously at a second NP in response to the switching request;
bringing up the plurality of links in accordance with an automatic protection switching (“APS”) pending state; and
temporarily suppressing network alarms to avoid higher level entities from entering link reset renegotiations.
2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising maintaining logical connectivity between the first NP and a second NP during a switchover from a first group of data links to a second group of data links.
3. The method of claim 2 , wherein maintaining logical connectivity between the first NP and a second NP during a switchover from a first group of data links to a second group of data links includes facilitating link connectivity while a switchover from a primary data connection to a redundant data connection.
4. The method of claim 1 , wherein receiving a switching request from a first network peer (“NP”) transmitted via a connection containing multiple links further includes receiving a switchover request (“SWO-Req”) formatted as link control protocol (“LCP”) option.
5. The method of claim 4 , wherein receiving a SWO-Req includes obtaining the SWO-Req from a remote peer located at one end of aggregated links employing multilink point-to-point protocol (“MLPPP”).
6. The method of claim 1 , wherein bringing down the plurality of links simultaneously includes moving the plurality of links to a starting state and starting a switchover timer.
7. The method of claim 1 , wherein bringing up the plurality of links includes transiting all links to the APS pending state and sending a switchover acknowledge (“SWO-Ack”) formatted as LCP option.
8. The method of claim 7 , wherein transiting all links to the APS pending state further includes sending an automatic protection switching echo request (“APS-Echo-Req”) when a link is opened.
9. The method of claim 1 , wherein temporarily suppressing network alarms includes keeping higher-level entities in a hold-up state for a predefined short period of time.
10. A network system, comprising:
a network peer (“NP”) capable of implementing automatic switchover;
a remote NP capable of implementing automatic switchover;
a connection having a first end and a second end, the first end of the connection coupled to the NP, the second end of the connection coupled to the remote NP, where the connection is configured to support multilink point-to-point protocol (“MLPPP”) and link control protocol (“LCP”); and
a redundant connection where a first end of the redundant connection is coupled to the NP and a second end of the redundant connection is coupled to the remote NP, wherein the NP is capable of broadcasting a switchover request (“SWO-Req”) over LCP indicating that a switchover is taking place.
11. The network system of claim 10 , wherein a switchover is able to switch from the connection to the redundant connection.
12. The network system of claim 11 , wherein the remote NP is capable of bringing down all communications traveling through the connection in response to the SWO-Req.
13. The network system of claim 12 , wherein the remote NP broadcasts a switchover acknowledge (“SWO-Ack”) to indicate that all links are ready to switch to the redundant connection.
14. The network system of claim 11 , wherein the remote NP sends a switchover not-acknowledge (“SWO-Nack”) in response to the SWO-Req if the remote NP declined to implement switchover.
15. A method for switchover protection, comprising:
receiving a switchover request from a first network peer (“NP”) transmitted via a first group of aggregated links operable within multilink point-to-point protocol (“MLPPP”);
bringing down the first group of aggregated links simultaneously in response to the switchover request;
switching over from the first group of aggregated links to a second group of aggregated links;
suppressing network alarms to avoid from entering link renegotiations; and
verifying the links in accordance with automatic protection switching (“APS”) pending state.
16. The method of claim 15 , further comprising maintaining logical connectivity between the first NP and a second NP during a switchover from a first group of data links to a second group of data links.
17. The method of claim 16 , wherein maintaining logical connectivity between the first NP and a second NP during a switchover from a first group of data links to a second group of data links includes facilitating link connectivity while a switchover from a primary data connection to a redundant data connection.
18. The method of claim 15 , wherein bringing down the group of aggregated links simultaneously in response to the switchover request includes moving all links to starting state and starting a switchover timer.
19. The method of claim 15 , wherein verifying the links in accordance with automatic protection switching (“APS”) pending state includes transiting all links to the APS pending state and sending a switchover acknowledge (“SWO-Ack”) formatted as LCP option.
20. The method of claim 19 , wherein transiting all links to the APS pending state further includes sending an automatic protection switching echo request (“APS-Echo-Req”) when a link is opened.