IP Library Granted Patent US 8,374,977
Granted Patent B2
US 8,374,977 · App. 12/721,393 · Granted Feb 12, 2013

Methods and systems for transductive data classification

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,374,977
App. No.
12/721,393
Granted
Feb 12, 2013
Kind
B2
Abstract

A system, method, data processing apparatus, and article of manufacture are provided for classifying data. Labeled data points are received, each of the labeled data points having at least one label indicating whether the data point is a training example for data points for being included in a designated category or a training example for data points being excluded from a designated category; receiving unlabeled data points; receiving at least one predetermined cost factor of the labeled data points and unlabeled data points; training a transductive classifier using MED through iterative calculation using the at least one cost factor and the labeled data points and the unlabeled data points as training examples; applying the trained classifier to classify at least one of the unlabeled data points, the labeled data points, and input data points; and outputting a classification of the classified data points, or derivative thereof.

Claims (59)

1. In a computer-based system, a method for classification of data comprising:

receiving labeled data points, each of said labeled data points having at least one label indicating whether the data point is a training example for data points for being included in a designated category or a training example for data points being excluded from a designated category;

receiving unlabeled data points;

receiving at least one predetermined cost factor of the labeled data points and unlabeled data points;

training a transductive classifier using Maximum Entropy Discrimination (MED) through iterative calculation using said at least one cost factor and the labeled data points and the unlabeled data points as training examples, wherein for each iteration of the calculations the unlabeled data point cost factor is adjusted as a function of an expected label value and a data point label prior probability is adjusted according to an estimate of a data point class membership probability;

applying the trained classifier to classify at least one of the unlabeled data points, the labeled data points, and input data points; and

outputting a classification of the classified data points, or derivative thereof, to at least one of a user, another system, and another process.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein said function is the absolute value of the expected label of a data point.

3. The method of claim 1 further comprising the step of receiving prior probability information of labeled and unlabeled data points.

4. The method of claim 3 wherein said transductive classifier learns using prior probability information of the labeled and unlabeled data.

5. The method of claim 1 comprising the further step of determining the decision function with minimal KL divergence using a Gaussian prior for the decision function parameters given the included and excluded training examples utilizing the labeled as well as the unlabeled data as learning examples according to their expected label.

6. The method of claim 1 comprising the further step of determining the decision function with minimal KL divergence using a multinomial prior distribution for the decision function parameters.

7. The method of claim 1 wherein the iterative step of training a transductive classifier is repeated until the convergence of data values is reached.

8. The method of claim 7 wherein convergence is reached when the change of the decision function of the transductive classifier falls below a predetermined threshold value.

9. The method of claim 7 wherein convergence is reached when the change of the determined expected label value falls below a predetermined threshold value.

10. The method of claim 1 wherein the label of the included training example has a value of +1 and the label of the excluded training example has a value of −1.

11. The method of claim 1 wherein the label of the included example is mapped to a first numeric value and the label of the excluded example to a second numeric value.

12. The method of claim 1 further comprising:

storing the labeled data points in a memory of a computer;

storing the unlabeled data points in a memory of a computer;

storing the input data points in a memory of a computer; and

storing the at least one predetermined cost factor of the labeled data points and unlabeled data points in a memory of a computer.

13. An article of manufacture comprising a program storage medium readable by a computer, the medium tangibly embodying one or more programs of instructions executable by a computer to perform a method of data classification comprising:

receiving labeled data points, each of said labeled data points having at least one label indicating whether the data point is a training example for data points for being included in a designated category or a training example for data points being excluded from a designated category;

receiving unlabeled data points;

receiving at least one predetermined cost factor of the labeled data points and unlabeled data points;

training a transductive classifier with iterative Maximum Entropy Discrimination (MED) calculation using said at least one stored cost factor and stored labeled data points and stored unlabeled data points as training examples wherein at each iteration of the MED calculation the unlabeled data point cost factor is adjusted as a function of an expected label value and a data point prior probability is adjusted according to an estimate of a data point class membership probability;

applying the trained classifier to classify at least one of the unlabeled data points, the labeled data points, and input data points; and

outputting a classification of the classified data points, or derivative thereof, to at least one of a user, another system, and another process.

14. The article of manufacture of claim 13 wherein said function is the absolute value the expected label of a data point.

15. The article of manufacture of claim 13 further comprising the step of storing prior probability information of labeled and unlabeled data points in a memory of a computer.

16. The article of manufacture of claim 15 wherein at each iteration of the MED calculation, the prior probability information is adjusted according to an estimate of a data point class membership probability.

17. The article of manufacture of claim 13 comprising the further step of determining the decision function with minimal KL divergence to the prior distribution of the decision function parameters given the included and excluded training examples utilizing the labeled as well as the unlabeled data as learning examples according to their expected label.

18. The article of manufacture of claim 13 wherein the iterative step of training a transductive classifier is repeated until the convergence of data values is reached.

19. The article of manufacture of claim 18 wherein convergence is reached when the change of the decision function of the transductive classification falls below a predetermined threshold value.

20. The article of manufacture of claim 18 wherein convergence is reached when the change of the determined expected label value falls below a predetermined threshold value.

21. The article of manufacture of claim 13 wherein the label of the included training example has a value of +1 and the label of the excluded training example has a value of −1.

22. The article of manufacture of claim 13 wherein the label of the included example is mapped to a first numeric value and the label of the excluded example is a second numeric value.

23. In a computer-based system, a method for classification of data comprising:

receiving labeled data points;

receiving unlabeled data points;

receiving at least one predetermined cost factor of the labeled data points and unlabeled data points;

training a transductive classifier using Maximum Entropy Discrimination (MED) through iterative calculation using said at least one cost factor and using the labeled data points and the unlabeled data points as training examples, wherein for each iteration of the calculations the unlabeled data point cost factor is adjusted as a function of an absolute value of an expected label value of a data point;

applying the trained classifier to classify at least one of the unlabeled data points, the labeled data points, and input data points; and

outputting a classification of the classified data points, or derivative thereof, to at least one of a user, another system, and another process.

24. The method of claim 23 , wherein a data point label prior probability is adjusted according to an estimate of a data point class membership probability.

25. The method of claim 23 , wherein the unlabeled data point cost factor is adjusted as a function of the absolute value of the expected label value of a data point according to:

| y |c

where | y | is the absolute value of an expected label value of a data point, and

c is the cost factor prior to adjustment thereof.

26. The method of claim 23 comprising the further step of determining the decision function with minimal KL divergence using a Gaussian prior for the decision function parameters given the included and excluded training examples utilizing the labeled as well as the unlabeled data as learning examples according to their expected label.

27. The method of claim 23 comprising the further step of determining the decision function with minimal KL divergence using a multinomial prior distribution for the decision function parameters.

28. The method of claim 23 wherein the iterative step of training a transductive classifier is repeated until the convergence of data values is reached.

29. The method of claim 23 wherein the label of the included example is mapped to a first numeric value and the label of the excluded example to a second numeric value.

30. The method of claim 23 further comprising:

storing the labeled data points in a memory of a computer;

storing the unlabeled data points in a memory of a computer;

storing the input data points in a memory of a computer; and

storing the at least one predetermined cost factor of the labeled data points and unlabeled data points in a memory of a computer.

Assignments (9)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 15, 2024
From: KOFAX, INC.
To: TUNGSTEN AUTOMATION CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 067428/0392 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jul 21, 2022
From: CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH
To: KAPOW TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; KOFAX, INC.
Reel/Frame 060805/0161 →
FIRST LIEN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jul 20, 2022
From: KOFAX, INC.; PSIGEN SOFTWARE, INC.
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 060757/0565 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jul 20, 2022
From: KOFAX, INC.; PSIGEN SOFTWARE, INC.
To: CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 060768/0159 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jul 7, 2017
From: KOFAX, INC.
To: CREDIT SUISSE
Reel/Frame 043108/0207 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 20, 2017
From: SCHMIDTLER, MAURITIUS A.R.; HARRIS, CHRISTOPHER K.
To: KOFAX IMAGE PRODUCTS, INC.
Reel/Frame 042759/0118 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded May 26, 2015
From: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
To: KOFAX, INC.; ATALASOFT, INC.; KAPOW TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Reel/Frame 035773/0930 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Aug 29, 2011
From: KOFAX, INC.
To: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Reel/Frame 026821/0833 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 13, 2010
From: KOFAX IMAGE PRODUCTS, INC.
To: KOFAX, INC.
Reel/Frame 024383/0801 →