IP Library Granted Patent US 8,290,168
Granted Patent B2
US 8,290,168 · App. 12/723,273 · Granted Oct 16, 2012

Audio broadcast processing method

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,290,168
App. No.
12/723,273
Granted
Oct 16, 2012
Kind
B2
Abstract

An audio broadcast processing method includes a plurality of steps. One step involves processing an audio broadcast having at least one occurrence of signal degradation that adversely affects audio quality of a corresponding segment of the audio performance. Another step involves modifying the segment of the audio performance with a plurality of differing signal degradation compensation factors to selectively compensate for the at least one occurrence of signal degradation to produce a plurality of compensated audio performances. Another step involves evaluating the compensated audio performances. Still another step involves determining at least one preferred signal degradation compensation factor based on data from the evaluating of the compensated audio performances. Yet another step includes configuring an audio device with the at least one preferred processing factor.

Claims (50)

1. An audio broadcast processing method comprising:

processing an audio broadcast having at least one occurrence of signal degradation that adversely affects audio quality of a corresponding segment of the audio performance;

modifying the segment of the audio performance with a plurality of differing signal degradation compensation factors to selectively compensate for the at least one occurrence of signal degradation to produce a plurality of compensated audio performances;

evaluating the compensated audio performances including

playing the compensated audio performances, one at a time, for at least one test listener, and

collecting listener preference information that corresponds to the data;

determining at least one preferred signal degradation compensation factor based on data from the evaluating of the compensated audio performances; and

configuring an audio device with the at least one preferred signal degradation compensation factor.

2. The method according to claim 1 , wherein

the evaluating of the compensated audio performance includes comparing one of the plurality of compensated audio performances with other of the plurality of compensated audio performances.

3. The method according to claim 1 , wherein

the determining of the at least one preferred signal degradation compensation factor includes performing a statistical analysis on listener preference information.

4. The method according to claim 3 , wherein

the statistical analysis is conducted using an analytic hierarchy process.

5. The method according to claim 1 , wherein

the determining of the at least one preferred signal degradation compensation factor includes grouping the listener preference information by musical categories.

6. The method according to claim 1 , wherein

the determining of the at least one preferred signal degradation compensation factor includes grouping the listener preference information by geographical location.

7. The method according to claim 1 , wherein

the processing of the audio broadcast includes providing the audio broadcast with a predetermined fading pattern for a plurality of occurrences of signal degradation.

8. The method according to claim 1 , wherein

the modifying of the segment of the audio performance includes providing at least two variable components that compensate for the at least one occurrence of signal degradation for each of the plurality of differing signal degradation compensation factors, the variable components being selected from at least one of:

a high-cut with attack and release timing;

a high-cut with gain attenuation;

a stereo-blend with attack and release timing;

a stereo-blend with gain attenuation;

a soft mute with attack and release timing; and

a soft mute with gain attenuation.

9. The method according to claim 1 , wherein

the determining of the at least one preferred signal degradation compensation factor includes performing a statistical analysis on listener preference information received from the at least one test listener.

10. The method according to claim 9 , wherein

the statistical analysis is conducted using an analytic hierarchy process.

11. The method according to claim 1 , wherein

the playing of the compensated audio performances includes playing the compensated audio performance for a plurality of groups of test listeners that corresponds to the at least one test listener.

12. The method according to claim 11 , wherein

each of the groups of test listeners is divided by musical genre.

13. The method according to claim 11 , wherein

the processing of the audio broadcast includes providing the audio broadcast with a predetermined fading pattern for a plurality of occurrences of signal degradation.

14. The method according to claim 11 , wherein

the modifying of the segment of the audio performance includes providing at least two variable components that compensate for the at least one occurrence of signal degradation for each of the plurality of differing signal degradation compensation factors, the variable components being selected from at least one of:

a high-cut with attack and release timing;

a high-cut with gain attenuation;

a stereo-blend with attack and release timing;

a stereo-blend with gain attenuation;

a soft mute with attack and release timing; and

a soft mute with gain attenuation.

15. The method according to claim 11 , wherein

the determining of the at least one preferred signal degradation compensation factor includes performing a statistical analysis on listener preference information received from the at least one test listener.

16. The method according to claim 15 , wherein

the statistical analysis is conducted using an analytic hierarchy process.

Assignments (3)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 14, 2013
From: NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC.
To: NISSAN MOTOR CO., LTD.
Reel/Frame 029815/0414 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 30, 2010
From: NISSAN TECHNICAL CENTER NORTH AMERICA, INC.
To: NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC.
Reel/Frame 025073/0093 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 12, 2010
From: BLASZCZYNSKI, LUKE S.; MASTROPIETRO, RON P.; DENNIS, PATRICK
To: NISSAN TECHNICAL CENTER NORTH AMERICA, INC.
Reel/Frame 024074/0763 →