IP Library Granted Patent US 8,594,182
Granted Patent B1
US 8,594,182 · App. 12/782,542 · Granted Nov 26, 2013

Systems and methods for video rate control

Inventor: William David Pardue (Dawsonville, GA)
Assignee: Verint Systems, Inc.
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,594,182
App. No.
12/782,542
Granted
Nov 26, 2013
Kind
B1
Abstract

In an embodiment, a method of operating a video system comprises determining an aggregate video data rate based on a video data rate for each of a plurality of cameras, determining a projected retention capability based on the aggregate video data rate and available storage capacity, determining a level of risk that the projected retention capability will not satisfy a required retention capability, determining an adjustment to the video data rate for at least a target camera of the plurality of cameras based on the level of risk.

Claims (39)

1. A method of operating a video system, the method comprising:

determining an aggregate video data rate based on a video data rate for each of a plurality of cameras;

determining a projected retention capability based on the aggregate video data rate;

determining a level of risk that the projected retention capability will not satisfy a required retention capability;

determining an adjustment to the video data rate for at least a target camera of the plurality of cameras based on the level of risk.

2. The method of claim 1 further comprising assigning a priority to each of the plurality of cameras and selecting the target camera from the plurality of cameras based on the priority assigned to each of the plurality of cameras.

3. The method of claim 1 wherein the adjustment to the video data rate comprises an increase in the video data rate when the level of risk falls below a threshold level of risk.

4. The method of claim 3 wherein the adjustment to the video data rate comprises a decrease in the video data rate when the level of risk exceeds the threshold level of risk.

5. The method of claim 1 wherein the adjustment to the video data rate comprises reducing compression when the level of risk falls below a threshold level of risk, and increasing compression when the level of risk exceeds the threshold level of risk.

6. The method of claim 1 wherein the aggregate video data rate comprises a sum of the video data rates for each of the plurality of cameras.

7. A rate control system comprising:

an interface configured to:

receive a video data rate for each of a plurality of cameras; and

transfer an adjustment to the video data rate for at least a target camera of the plurality of cameras; and

a processing system configured to:

determine an aggregate video data rate based on the video data rate for each of a plurality of cameras;

determine a projected retention capability based on the aggregate video data rate and available storage capacity;

determine a level of risk that the projected retention capability will not satisfy a required retention capability; and

determine the adjustment to the video data rate for at least a target camera of the plurality of cameras based on the level of risk.

8. The rate control system of claim 7 wherein the processing system is further configured to assign a priority to each of the plurality of cameras and select the target camera from the plurality of cameras based on the priority assigned to each of the plurality of cameras.

9. The rate control system of claim 7 wherein the adjustment to the video data rate comprises an increase in the video data rate when the level of risk falls below a threshold level of risk.

10. The rate control system of claim 9 wherein the adjustment to the video data rate comprises a decrease in the video data rate when the level of risk exceeds the threshold level of risk.

11. The rate control system of claim 7 wherein the adjustment to the video data rate comprises reducing compression when the level of risk falls below a threshold level of risk, and increasing compression when the level of risk exceeds the threshold level of risk.

12. The rate control system of claim 7 wherein the aggregate video data rate comprises a sum of the video data rates for each of the plurality of cameras.

13. A rate control system comprising:

an interface configured to:

receive a video data rate for each of a plurality of cameras; and

transfer an adjustment to the video data rate for at least a target camera of the plurality of cameras; and

a processing system configured to:

determine an aggregate video data rate based on the video data rate for each of a plurality of cameras;

determine a projected retention capability based on the aggregate video data rate and the available storage capacity;

determine the adjustment to the video data rate for at least a target camera of the plurality of cameras based at least on the projected retention capability.

14. The rate control system of claim 13 wherein the processing system is further configured to assign a priority to each of the plurality of cameras and select the target camera from the plurality of cameras based on the priority assigned to each of the plurality of cameras.

15. The rate control system of claim 13 wherein the processing system is further configured to determine a level of risk that the projected retention capability will not satisfy a required retention capability.

16. The rate control system of claim 15 wherein the processing system is configured to determine the adjustment to the video data rate based on the level of risk.

17. The rate control system of claim 16 wherein the adjustment to the video data rate comprises an increase in the video data rate when the level of risk falls below a threshold level of risk.

18. The rate control system of claim 17 wherein the adjustment to the video data rate comprises a decrease in the video data rate when the level of risk exceeds the threshold level of risk.

19. The rate control system of claim 16 wherein the adjustment to the video data rate comprises reducing compression when the level of risk falls below a threshold level of risk, and increasing compression when the level of risk exceeds the threshold level of risk.

20. The rate control system of claim 13 wherein the aggregate video data rate comprises a sum of the video data rate for each of the plurality of cameras.

Assignments (10)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 7, 2022
From: COGNYTE SOFTWARE LTD.
To: COGNYTE TECHNOLOGIES ISRAEL LTD
Reel/Frame 061675/0724 →
NOTICE OF PARTIAL TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENT RIGHTS Recorded Oct 17, 2022
From: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
To: COGNYTE SOFTWARE LTD. (AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO VERINT AMERICAS INC.)
Reel/Frame 061686/0615 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Apr 20, 2022
From: VERINT SYSTEMS LTD.
To: COGNYTE TECHNOLOGIES ISRAEL LTD
Reel/Frame 059710/0742 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Dec 23, 2021
From: VERINT SYSTEMS LTD.
To: COGNYTE TECHNOLOGIES ISRAEL LTD
Reel/Frame 060751/0532 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 22, 2021
From: VERINT AMERICAS INC.
To: COGNYTE SOFTWARE LTD.
Reel/Frame 057569/0475 →
GRANT OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENT RIGHTS Recorded Jul 21, 2017
From: VERINT AMERICAS INC.
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 043293/0567 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jun 30, 2017
From: CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH
To: VERINT SYSTEMS INC.
Reel/Frame 043066/0318 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 12, 2016
From: VERINT SYSTEMS INC.
To: VERINT AMERICAS INC.
Reel/Frame 037724/0507 →
GRANT OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENT RIGHTS Recorded Oct 21, 2013
From: VERINT SYSTEMS INC.
To: CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 031465/0314 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 31, 2013
From: PARDUE, WILLIAM DAVID
To: VERINT SYSTEMS INC.
Reel/Frame 030119/0945 →
Continuity (1)
Provisional Application 61179260 · May 18, 2009