IP Library Granted Patent US 8,538,773
Granted Patent B2
US 8,538,773 · App. 12/788,242 · Granted Sep 17, 2013

Healthcare quality measurement

Inventors: David M. Eddy (Aspen, CO); Joshua Adler (Tampa, FL); Macdonald Scott Morris (Atherton, CA)
Assignee: Archimedes, Inc.
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,538,773
App. No.
12/788,242
Granted
Sep 17, 2013
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method of determining a quality of care provided by a healthcare provider to individuals in a population is provided. A data processing apparatus that has one or more processors is disclosed. Data representing biomarkers for individuals in a population is received. Baseline and present risks are determined. Risk reduction values are determined. Based on the current risk reduction, a quality score is determined. A scale is created, and the quality score is mapped to the scale. The global quality score of the disclosure provides numerous benefits over past performance measures.

Claims (81)

1. A method for determining a quality of care provided by a healthcare provider to individuals in a population, comprising:

receiving data representing a plurality of biomarkers for at least a portion of the individuals in the population;

determining a baseline health outcome metric based on baseline treatment information associated with the population;

wherein the baseline health outcome metric represents an expected rate of an outcome of interest obtainable if no person in the population had received a treatment;

determining a current health outcome metric based on current treatment information associated with the population;

determining a current health outcome metric reduction value as a difference between the baseline health outcome metric and the current health outcome metric;

determining a quality score value based at least in part on the current health outcome metric reduction value;

assigning the baseline health outcome metric to a quality of care scale;

mapping the quality score value to the quality of care scale;

determining a target health outcome metric representing a desired value of the metric for the population, wherein the target health outcome metric could be zero;

determining a potential health outcome metric reduction value as a difference between the baseline health outcome metric and the target health outcome metric;

determining the quality score value based at least in part on the potential health outcome metric value;

assigning the target health outcome metric to the quality of care scale;

wherein the steps are performed by one or more processors.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining a quality score value comprises dividing the current health outcome metric reduction value by the potential health outcome metric reduction value.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the baseline health outcome metric represents a baseline risk of the population incurring one or more healthcare outcomes, and the current health outcome metric represents a present risk of the population incurring the one or more healthcare outcomes.

4. The method of claim 3 , further comprising:

determining the target health outcome metric representing a reduced risk for the population incurring the one or more healthcare outcomes;

determining the potential health outcome metric reduction value as a difference between the baseline health outcome metric and the target health outcome metric;

determining the quality score value based at least in part on the potential health outcome metric value;

assigning the target health outcome metric to the quality of care scale.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein determining the quality score value comprises dividing the current health outcome metric reduction value by the potential health outcome metric reduction value.

6. The method of claim 4 , further comprising determining a cost associated with the baseline risk, the current risk, and the target risk, wherein cost determination comprises subtracting a savings value associated with prevention of the one or more healthcare outcomes from a treatment cost associated with a risk level.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the baseline health outcome metric comprises determining an individual baseline health outcome metric for each of the individuals in the population, determining a sum of the individual baseline health outcome metrics of all the individuals, and determining the baseline health outcome metric per person year.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the baseline health outcome metric is based, at least in part, on one or more of:

an assumption that the population is receiving or had received none of one or more treatments or medical interventions that address the healthcare outcomes;

a prior healthcare state of the population; and

deciding which changes in patient risk factors between two dates can be attributed to the efforts of the care provider or other entity whose efforts are being assigned a quality score.

9. The method of claim 1 , further comprising mapping the quality of care scale to a performance scale that measures performance based on guidelines.

10. A non-transitory computer readable storage medium storing one or more sequences of instructions for determining a quality of care provided by a healthcare provider to individuals in a population, which instructions, when executed by one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to perform:

receiving data representing a plurality of biomarkers for at least a portion of the individuals in the population;

determining a baseline health outcome metric based on baseline treatment information associated with the population;

wherein the baseline health outcome metric represents an expected rate of an outcome of interest obtainable if no person in the population had received a treatment;

determining a current health outcome metric based on current treatment information associated with the population;

determining a current health outcome metric reduction value as a difference between the baseline health outcome metric and the current health outcome metric;

determining a quality score value based at least in part on the current health outcome metric reduction value;

assigning the baseline health outcome metric to a quality of care scale;

mapping the quality score value to the quality of care scale;

determining a target health outcome metric representing a desired value of the metric for the population, wherein the target health outcome metric could be zero;

determining a potential health outcome metric reduction value as a difference between the baseline health outcome metric and the target health outcome metric;

determining the quality score value based at least in part on the potential health outcome metric value;

assigning the target health outcome metric to the quality of care scale.

11. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 10 , wherein the instructions that cause determining the quality score value further comprise instructions which, when executed, cause: dividing the current health outcome metric reduction value by the potential health outcome metric reduction value.

12. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 10 , wherein the baseline health outcome metric represents a baseline risk of the population incurring one or more healthcare outcomes, and the current health outcome metric represents a present risk of the population incurring the one or more healthcare outcomes.

13. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 12 , wherein the instructions further include instructions for:

determining the target health outcome metric representing a reduced risk for the population incurring the one or more healthcare outcomes;

determining the potential health outcome metric reduction value as a difference between the baseline health outcome metric and the target health outcome metric;

determining the quality score value based at least in part on the potential health outcome metric value;

assigning the target health outcome metric to the quality of care scale.

14. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 13 , wherein the instructions that cause determining the quality score value further comprise instructions which, when executed, cause dividing the current health outcome metric reduction value by the potential health outcome metric reduction value.

15. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 13 , further comprising instructions which, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to determine a cost associated with the baseline risk, the current risk, and the target risk, wherein cost determination comprises subtracting a savings value associated with prevention of the one or more healthcare outcomes from a treatment cost associated with a risk level.

16. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 10 , wherein the instructions that cause determining the baseline health outcome metric further comprise instructions which, when executed, cause: determining an individual baseline health outcome metric for each of the individuals in the population, determining a sum of the individual baseline health outcome metrics of all the individuals, and determining the baseline health outcome metric per person year.

17. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 10 , wherein the baseline health outcome metric is based at least in part on one or more of:

an assumption that the population is receiving none of one or more treatments or medical interventions that address the healthcare outcomes;

a prior healthcare state of the population; and

deciding which changes in patient risk factors between two dates can be attributed to the efforts of the care provider or other entity whose efforts are being assigned a quality score.

18. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 10 , further comprising instructions which, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to map the quality of care scale to a performance scale that measures performance based on guidelines.

19. An apparatus comprising:

one or more processors;

data receiving logic configured to receive data representing a plurality of biomarkers for at least a portion of individuals in a population;

health outcome metric determination logic configured to determine a baseline health outcome metric based on baseline treatment information associated with the population and a current health outcome metric based on current treatment information associated with the population; wherein the baseline health outcome metric represents an expected rate of an outcome of interest obtainable if no person in the population had received a treatment;

health outcome metric reduction logic configured to determine a current health outcome metric reduction value as a second difference between the baseline health outcome metric and the current health outcome metric;

quality determination logic configured to determine a quality score value based at least in part on the current health outcome reduction value;

scale compilation logic configured to assign the baseline risk to a quality of care scale and map the quality score value to the quality of care scale;

wherein the health outcome metric determination logic is further configured to determine: a target health outcome metric representing a desired value of the metric for the population; and a potential health outcome metric reduction value as a difference between the baseline health outcome metric and the target health outcome metric, wherein the target health outcome metric could be zero;

wherein the quality determination logic is further configured to determine the quality score value based at least in part on the potential health outcome metric value;

wherein the scale compilation logic is further configured to assign the target health outcome metric to the quality of care scale.

20. The apparatus of claim 19 , wherein determining a quality score value comprises dividing the current health outcome metric reduction value by the potential health outcome metric reduction value.

21. The apparatus of claim 19 , wherein the baseline health outcome metric represents a baseline risk of the population incurring one or more healthcare outcomes, and the current health outcome metric represents a present risk of the population incurring the one or more healthcare outcomes.

22. The apparatus of claim 21 , wherein:

health outcome metric determination logic is further configured to determine: the target health outcome metric representing a reduced risk for the population incurring the one or more healthcare outcomes; and the potential health outcome metric reduction value as a difference between the baseline health outcome metric and the target health outcome metric;

quality determination logic is further configured to determine the quality score value based at least in part on the potential health outcome metric value;

scale compilation logic is further configured to assign the target health outcome metric to the quality of care scale.

23. The apparatus of claim 22 , wherein determining the quality score value comprises dividing the current health outcome metric reduction value by the potential health outcome metric reduction value.

24. The apparatus of claim 22 , wherein the scale compilation logic is further configured to determine a cost associated with the baseline risk, the current risk, and the target risk, wherein cost determination comprises subtracting a savings value associated with prevention of the one or more healthcare outcomes from a treatment cost associated with a risk level.

25. The apparatus of claim 19 , wherein determining the baseline health outcome metric comprises determining an individual baseline health outcome metric for each of the individuals in the population, determining a sum of the individual baseline health outcome metrics of all the individuals, and determining the baseline health outcome metric per person year.

26. The apparatus of claim 19 , wherein the baseline health outcome metric is based at least in part on one or more of:

an assumption that the population is receiving none of one or more treatments or medical interventions that address the healthcare outcomes;

a prior healthcare state of the population; and

deciding which changes in patient risk factors between two dates can be attributed to the efforts of the care provider or other entity whose efforts are being assigned a quality score.

27. The apparatus of claim 19 , wherein the scale compilation logic is further configured to map the quality of care scale to a performance scale that measures performance based on guidelines.

Assignments (20)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Dec 6, 2024
From: WESTERN ALLIANCE BANK
To: AZARA INTERMEDIATE LLC.
Reel/Frame 069507/0958 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Dec 6, 2024
From: WEBSTER BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
To: CLINICAL ANALYTICS CORP.
Reel/Frame 069508/0182 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Dec 6, 2024
From: WEBSTER BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
To: AZARA INTERMEDIATE LLC.
Reel/Frame 069508/0128 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded May 9, 2023
From: AZARA INTERMEDIATE LLC
To: WESTERN ALLIANCE BANK
Reel/Frame 063580/0902 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 15, 2023
From: CLINICAL ANALYTICS CORP.
To: MDDATACOR, LLC
Reel/Frame 062705/0231 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 15, 2023
From: MDDATACOR, LLC
To: AZARA INTERMEDIATE LLC
Reel/Frame 062705/0037 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jun 9, 2022
From: AZARA INTERMEDIATE LLC
To: WEBSTER BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Reel/Frame 060328/0412 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jan 25, 2021
From: CLINICAL ANALYTICS CORP.
To: STERLING NATIONAL BANK
Reel/Frame 055023/0270 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 23, 2020
From: SILICON VALLEY BANK
To: SYMPHONY PERFORMANCE HEALTH, INC.; SYMPHONY PERFORMANCE HEALTH HOLDINGS, INC.; CLINICAL ANALYTICS CORP.; STG M&M PARENT INC.; MDDATACOR, LLC; MERRIMAN PARENT, INC.; MERRIMAN, INC.; VOYANCE, LLC; PATIENT SATISFACTION PLUS, LLC
Reel/Frame 054449/0747 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jun 26, 2019
From: VENTURE LENDING & LEASING VII, INC.
To: SYMPHONY PERFORMANCE HEALTH HOLDINGS, INC.; SYMPHONY PERFORMANCE HEALTH, INC.; VOYANCE, LLC; CLINICAL ANALYTICS CORP.
Reel/Frame 049594/0747 →
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jun 6, 2019
From: SYMPHONY PERFORMANCE HEALTH, INC.; SYMPHONY PERFORMANCE HEALTH HOLDINGS, INC.; CLINICAL ANALYTICS CORP.; STG M&M PARENT INC.; MDDATACOR, LLC; MERRIMAN PARENT, INC.; MERRIMAN, INC.; VOYANCE, LLC; PATIENT SATISFACTION PLUS, LLC
To: SILICON VALLEY BANK
Reel/Frame 049406/0142 →
TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENT COLLATERAL (RELEASES RF 03214/0260) Recorded Sep 2, 2016
From: WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
To: ARCHIMEDES, INC.; EVIDERA HOLDINGS, INC.; EVIDERA, INC.; EVIDERA LLC
Reel/Frame 039905/0004 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Sep 8, 2015
From: WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
To: EVIDERA HOLDINGS, INC.; EVIDERA, INC.; EVIDERA LLC; ARCHIMEDES, INC.
Reel/Frame 036511/0774 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded May 15, 2015
From: SYMPHONY PERFORMANCE HEALTH HOLDINGS, INC.; SYMPHONY PERFORMANCE HEALTH, INC.; VOYANCE, LLC; CLINICAL ANALYTICS CORP.
To: VENTURE LENDING & LEASING VII, INC.
Reel/Frame 035652/0320 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 29, 2014
From: EVIDERA ARCHIMEDES, INC.
To: CLINICAL ANALYTICS CORP.
Reel/Frame 033414/0751 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jun 27, 2014
From: KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS
To: ARCHIMEDES, INC.
Reel/Frame 033248/0057 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Jun 20, 2014
From: ARCHIMEDES, INC.
To: EVIDERA ARCHIMEDES, INC.
Reel/Frame 033205/0859 →
PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Feb 5, 2014
From: EVIDERA HOLDINGS, INC.; EVIDERA, INC.; EVIDERA LLC; ARCHIMEDES, INC.
To: WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS AGENT
Reel/Frame 032164/0260 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Oct 16, 2013
From: ARCHIMEDES, INC.
To: KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS
Reel/Frame 031421/0398 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 18, 2010
From: EDDY, DAVID M.; ADLER, JOSHUA; MORRIS, MACDONALD SCOTT
To: ARCHIMEDES, INC.
Reel/Frame 024561/0307 →
Continuity (3)
Provisional Application 61181636 · May 27, 2009
Provisional Application 61181663 · May 27, 2009
Related Publication 20100305964A1 · Dec 2, 2010