IP Library Granted Patent US 8,452,634
Granted Patent B2
US 8,452,634 · App. 12/788,399 · Granted May 28, 2013

Method and system for assessing the progress of a project in terms of its schedule

Inventor: Manikandan Ramasamy (Bangalore, IN)
Assignee: Infosys Limited
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,452,634
App. No.
12/788,399
Granted
May 28, 2013
Kind
B2
Abstract

The invention describes a computer-implemented method and system for assessing the progress of a project in terms of its schedule. The method includes receiving project data and based on the project data, calculating a first period (PE) after which a current earned value (EV) was expected to be realized. The method also includes calculating a second period (PR) in which the current EV has been realized. Further, the method includes calculating a fraction component (EF) of a period when the current EV was expected to be realized and finally, calculating an earned schedule performance index (ESPI) based on PE, PR and EF, wherein the ESPI indicates whether the project is on schedule.

Claims (24)

1. A computer-implemented method for assessing the progress of a project in terms of its schedule, the method comprising:

i. receiving project data from a database; and

ii. based on the received project data, calculating by a processor:

a first period (PE) after which a current earned value (EV) was expected to be realized, the first period being calculated in terms of a predefined unit of time;

a second period (PR) in which the current EV has been realized, the second period being calculated in terms of the predefined unit of time;

a fraction component (EF) of a period when the current EV was expected to be realized, wherein the EF is calculated as: EF=(EV−PVp)/(PVw−PVp), wherein EV is the earned value, PVp is the previous planned value associated with a period immediately preceding the one in which the current EV was expected to be realized, and PVw is the planned value of the period in which the current EV was expected to be realized; and

an earned schedule performance index (ESPI) based on PE, PR, and EF, wherein the ESPI indicates whether the project is on schedule.

2. The method as recited in claim 1 , wherein the PE is calculated as: PE=SDp−START+1, wherein SDp is a status date associated with a previous planned value (PVp) and START is the start date of the project.

3. The method as recited in claim 1 , wherein the PR is calculated as: PR=SD−START+1, wherein SD is a status date of current status report and START is the start date of the project.

4. The method as recited in claim 1 , wherein the ESPI is calculated as: ESPI=(EF+PE)/PR.

5. The method as recited in claim 1 , wherein the predefined unit of time comprises months, weeks, days, hours, minutes and seconds.

6. A system for assessing the progress of a project, the system comprising:

i. a database for storing project data; and

ii. a processor for calculating, based on the stored project data:

a first period (PE) after which a current earned value (EV) was expected to be realized, the first period being calculated in terms of a predefined unit of time;

a second period (PR) in which the current EV has been realized, the second period being calculated in terms of the predefined unit of time;

a fraction component (EF) of a period when the current EV was expected to be realized, wherein the EF is calculated as: EF=(EV−PVp)/(PVw−PVp), wherein EV is the earned value, PVp is the previous planned value associated with a period immediately preceding the one in which the current EV was expected to be realized, and PVw is the planned value of the period in which the current EV was expected to be realized; and

an earned schedule performance index (ESPI) based on PE, PR and EF, wherein the ESPI indicates whether the project is on schedule.

7. The system as recited in claim 6 , wherein the processor calculates the PE as: PE=SDp−START+1, wherein SDp is a status date associated with a previous planned value (PVp) and START is the start date of the project.

8. The system as recited in claim 6 , wherein the processor calculates the PR as: PR=SD−START+1, wherein SD is a status date of current status report and START is the start date of the project.

9. The system as recited in claim 6 , wherein the processor calculates the ESPI as: ESPI=(EF+PE)/PR.

10. The system as recited in claim 6 , wherein the predefined unit of time comprises months, weeks, days, hours, minutes and seconds.

11. The system as recited in claim 6 , further comprising a storage module for storing at least calculated values of PE, PR, EF and ESPI.

12. The system as recited in claim 6 , further comprising a reporting module for generating reports based on calculated values of PE, PR, EF and ESPI.

Assignments (3)
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Mar 19, 2013
From: INFOSYS TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED
To: INFOSYS LIMITED
Reel/Frame 030039/0819 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE ASSIGNEE'S ADDRESS PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 024448 FRAME 0565. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT. Recorded Jun 25, 2010
From: RAMASAMY, MANIKANDAN
To: INFOSYS TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED
Reel/Frame 024593/0594 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 27, 2010
From: RAMASAMY, MANIKANDAN
To: INFOSYS TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED
Reel/Frame 024448/0565 →
Priority Claims (1)
IN 2781/CHE/2009 · Nov 12, 2009 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20110112883A1 · May 12, 2011