IP Library Granted Patent US 8,692,549
Granted Patent B2
US 8,692,549 · App. 12/788,439 · Granted Apr 8, 2014

Method for reconstructing images of an imaged subject from a parallel MRI acquisition

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,692,549
App. No.
12/788,439
Granted
Apr 8, 2014
Kind
B2
Abstract

A parallel MR imaging method that uses a reconstruction algorithm that combines the GRAPPA image reconstruction method and the compressed sensing (CS) image reconstruction method in an iterative approach ( 200 ) or joint energy optimization approach ( 300 ).

Claims (55)

1. A method for reconstructing images of an imaged subject from a parallel MRI acquisition, comprising:

a. generating, for each response signal received by a respective RF reception coil, a complete dataset in k-space from a reduced k-space dataset of the respective response signal and associated weighting factors for the reduced k-space dataset;

b. spatially transforming each complete k-space dataset generated to obtain an estimated reconstructed image for a respective RF reception coil, the estimated reconstructed image having a measure of sparsity;

c. maximizing the sparsity of the estimated reconstructed images;

d. repeating the generating and the spatially transforming steps using revised associated weighting factors obtained from each respective k-space dataset that results from the maximizing step; and

e. combining the estimated reconstructed images for the respective RF reception coils to obtain a reconstructed image of the imaged subject.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the generating step and the spatially transforming step are each performed using a generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions technique.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the maximizing step comprises maximizing using a compressed sensing technique.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the generating step comprises deriving the associated weighting factors from reference calibration data for a respective reduced k-space dataset.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the generating step comprises deriving the associated weighting factors from reference calibration data that is obtained from a respective reduced k-space dataset.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the generating step comprises deriving the associated weighting factors from reference calibration data that is obtained from a respective reduced k-space dataset and the repeating step comprises deriving the revised associated weighting factors from reference calibration data that is obtained from a respective complete k-space dataset that results from the maximizing step.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the maximizing step comprises maximizing using a compressed sensing technique.

8. The method of claim 7 , wherein the maximizing step comprises optimizing a sparsifying transform of an estimated reconstructed image over the set of values of the unacquired k-space data missing in the respective reduced k-space dataset.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the maximizing step comprises optimizing a sparsifying transform of an estimated reconstructed image over the set of values of the unacquired k-space data missing in the respective reduced k-space dataset.

10. The method of claim 9 , wherein the generating step comprises deriving the associated weighting factors from reference calibration data that is obtained from a respective reduced k-space dataset and the repeating step comprises deriving the revised associated weighting factors from reference calibration data that is obtained from a respective complete k-space dataset that results from the maximizing step.

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein the combining step comprises combining the estimated reconstructed images using a sum of squares reconstruction to obtain a reconstructed image of the imaged subject.

12. A method for obtaining an image of a subject by a parallel MR imaging device, comprising a) generating image reconstruction data from a generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions reconstruction of weighted under-sampled k-space data acquired by each RF reception coil of the device; b) calculating new weightings for respective under-sampled k-space data from k-space data obtained from a compressed sensing reconstruction of the image reconstruction data previously generated; and c) reconstructing the subject image according to the image reconstruction data generated from repeating the generating and calculating steps until convergence is achieved.

13. The method of claim 12 , wherein the generating step comprises deriving the weightings from calibration data that is obtained from respective under-sampled k-space data.

14. The method of claim 12 , wherein the compressed sensing reconstruction obtains k-space data by maximizing sparsity measures of a reconstructed image from the image reconstruction data generated.

15. The method of claim 12 , wherein the compressed sensing reconstruction obtains k-space data by optimizing a sparsifying transform of a reconstructed image over the set of values of the unacquired k-space data missing in the respective under-sampled k-space data.

16. The method of claim 12 , wherein the reconstructing step comprises reconstructing using a weighted combination of the individual image reconstructions from each RF reception coil of the device.

17. A method for obtaining an image of a subject using parallel MR imaging, comprising a) generating image reconstruction data from a generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA) reconstruction of weighted under-sampled k-space data acquired by each RF reception coil; b) generating image reconstruction data from a compressed sensing (CS) reconstruction of under-sampled k-space data acquired by each RF reception coil; c) reconstructing the subject image according to the image reconstruction data generated and the formula

min

x

Ψ

x

0

+

λ

Ψ

x

-

C

D

W

y

_

2

,

where x represents the pixel intensities of the reconstructed images for the RF reception coils; Ψ represents a sparsifying transform; C represents a weighting matrix from the RF reception coils or the image estimates; D represents a block-diagonal matrix consisting of a discrete Fourier transform matrix; W represents a matrix operator that stores sets of weights which vary with the RF reception coils that may be applied to produce missing data in under-sampled k-space data; y represents the concatenated vector of the under-sampled k-space data from all the RF reception coils; and λ represents a parameter to control the degree to which the formula solution indicates a GRAPPA or a CS solution.

Assignments (6)
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE ASSIGNEE PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 066088 FRAME: 0256. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT. Recorded Jan 17, 2024
From: SIEMENS HEALTHCARE GMBH
To: SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS AG
Reel/Frame 071178/0246 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 20, 2023
From: SIEMENS HEALTHCARE GMBH
To: SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS AG
Reel/Frame 066088/0256 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 28, 2016
From: SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT
To: SIEMENS HEALTHCARE GMBH
Reel/Frame 039271/0561 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 26, 2014
From: POLIMENI, JONATHAN RIZZO
To: THE GENERAL HOSPITAL CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 032303/0886 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 9, 2011
From: SIEMENS CORPORATION
To: SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT
Reel/Frame 025774/0578 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 18, 2010
From: GRADY, LEO
To: SIEMENS CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 025373/0972 →