IP Library Granted Patent US 8,693,788
Granted Patent B2
US 8,693,788 · App. 12/852,195 · Granted Apr 8, 2014

Assessing features for classification

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,693,788
App. No.
12/852,195
Granted
Apr 8, 2014
Kind
B2
Abstract

Among other things, a degree is determined to which values of a feature that characterizes cases correctly predict classes to which cases belong, the degree depending on a combination of at least two factors that include: (a) uncertainty about the values that the feature will have depending on knowledge about classes to which cases belong, and (b) comparison of one or more first values of the feature that are associated with cases that belong to a first class with one or more second values of the feature associated with cases belonging to a second class.

Claims (32)

1. A computer-implemented method comprising:

determining, by a processor, a degree to which values of a feature that characterizes cases correctly predict classes to which the cases belong, the degree depending on a mathematical combination of at least two factors that include:

(a) uncertainty about the values that the feature will have depending on knowledge about classes to which the cases belong, wherein the uncertainty comprises an entropy of the values of the feature, and

(b) comparison of one or more first values of the feature that are associated with cases that belong to a first class with one or more second values of the feature associated with cases belonging to a second class.

2. The method of claim 1 in which the uncertainty is represented by a mutual information measure.

3. The method of claim 1 in which the comparison comprises a distance measure.

4. The method of claim 3 in which the distance measure is normalized.

5. The method of claim 1 in which the uncertainty about the values of the feature comprises an uncertainty when the classes to which the cases belong are known, and an uncertainty when the classes to which the cases belong are not known.

6. The method of claim 1 , in which the degree is determined as a score.

7. The method of claim 1 , in which the comparison of one or more first values of the feature with one or more second values of the feature comprises determining differences between first values and second values.

8. The method of claim 1 , in which the comparison of one or more first values of the feature with one or more second values of the feature comprises a comparison of a first value of the feature with two or more second values of the feature.

9. The method of claim 1 , in which the degree is determined with respect to values of more than one such feature, the degree depending on:

(a) uncertainty about values that the more than one such feature will have depending on the classes to which cases belong, and

(b) comparison of one or more first values of the more than one such feature that are associated with cases that belong to a first class with one or more second values of the more than one such feature associated with cases belonging to a second class.

10. The method of claim 3 , in which the comparison comprises a metric distance between the one or more first values of the feature and the one or more second values of the feature.

11. The method of claim 1 , in which the cases comprise medical cases.

12. The method of claim 1 in which the cases comprise communication cases.

13. The method of claim 1 in which the cases comprise computer-vision cases.

14. The method of claim 1 in which the cases comprise computer-security cases.

15. The method of claim 1 in which the cases comprise voice-recognition cases.

16. The method of claim 1 in which the cases comprise genetic cases.

17. The method of claim 10 , in which the cases comprise skin lesions and the classes include melanoma and non-melanoma.

18. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining a first degree to which a value of a first feature that characterizes cases correctly predicts classes to which a particular case belongs;

determining a second degree to which a value of a second feature that characterizes cases correctly predicts classes to which a particular case belongs; and

comparing the determined first and second degrees.

19. The method of claim 1 , further including:

selecting a feature for use in classification, based at least in part on the determination of the degree.

20. The method of claim 1 , in which the cases are represented by digital images and the features relate to what is portrayed in the digital images.

21. The method of claim 20 , in which the values comprise measures of features that appear in the digital images.

22. The method of claim 1 in which the uncertainty is represented by an accuracy measure.

23. The method of claim 1 in which the degree is determined based on a single calculation that uses at least the factors (a) and (b).

Assignments (5)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Oct 6, 2021
From: STRATA SKIN SCIENCES, INC.
To: MIDCAP FINANCIAL TRUST
Reel/Frame 057717/0796 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jan 20, 2020
From: MIDCAP FINANCIAL TRUST
To: STRATA SKIN SCIENCES, INC.
Reel/Frame 051558/0510 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Jun 30, 2016
From: MELA SCIENCES, INC.
To: STRATA SKIN SCIENCES, INC.
Reel/Frame 039219/0505 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Dec 31, 2015
From: MELA SCIENCES, INC.
To: MIDCAP FINANCIAL TRUST, AS AGENT
Reel/Frame 037391/0451 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 24, 2010
From: WOJTON, MACIEJ; KABELEV, NIKOLAI
To: MELA SCIENCES, INC.
Reel/Frame 024878/0580 →