IP Library Granted Patent US 8,314,710
Granted Patent B2
US 8,314,710 · App. 12/856,953 · Granted Nov 20, 2012

Method and system for a filter

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,314,710
App. No.
12/856,953
Granted
Nov 20, 2012
Kind
B2
Abstract

The present invention relates to a system for determining particle transmittance T x of a filter for use with a particle detection system to provide a filter warning for aspirated particle detection systems by detecting a level of first particles having a size indicative of smoke particles and which pass through the detection system; determining an integrated smoke hours value by integrating the detected level of first particles over time; estimating the smoke particle transmittance T x of the filter by applying a predetermined weighting operation to the integrated smoke hours value. An empirical measure of a filter's particle transmittance T x , due to at least first particles having a size indicative of smoke particles may be achieved by way of integrating a level of such first particles passing through a particle detection system over time to determine the proportion of smoke particles arrested by a filter, “integrated smoke hours”. The “integrated smoke hours” value is, generally, a measure of cumulative filter blockage over time by smoke like particles and is a measure of a given amount of ambient smoke detected and recorded by a smoke detector system and integrated over the time of exposure of the smoke detector system to the ambient smoke. Using this method it is not necessary to infer the actual “filter load” per-se or, the actual particle mass trapped in the filter.

Claims (85)

1. A method of indicating particle transmittance of a filter in a smoke detector, the method including:

detecting the level of smoke passing through a detection chamber of the smoke detector;

evaluating an integral function of the detected level of smoke over time to ascertain total integrated smoke hours;

processing the integrated smoke hours and a predetermined threshold value to determine a condition of the filter; and

sending a signal indicating a fault condition when the determined condition of the filter meets at least one predetermined criterion.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of processing the integrated smoke hours and a predetermined threshold value includes comparing the integrated smoke hours to the predetermined threshold value.

3. The method of claim 2 wherein the method further includes:

comparing the integrated smoke hours to second predetermined threshold value; and;

sending a signal indicating a critical fault condition when the total integrated smoke hours exceeds the second predetermined threshold value.

4. The method of claim 3 wherein the signal indicating a critical fault condition indicates the end of life of the filter of a particle detector.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the integral function of the detected level of smoke includes the relationship:

a ( bS C +dS )

where S=detected level of smoke (percentage (%) obscuration/meter) measured at an exit of the filter at an instant in time; and

a, b, c and d are coefficients established from empirical testing of a filter within a predetermined configuration of a particle detection system.

6. The method of claim 1 , further comprising the step of:

determining a flow rate of air passing through the smoke detector.

7. The method of claim 6 wherein, the integral function is:

x=∫a ( bS C +dS×eFR ) dt

wherein

FR=Flow Rate of air in the smoke detector, being a time varying value;

e is a coefficient established from empirical testing of a given configuration of a particle detection system;

S=detected level of smoke (percentage (%) obscuration/meter) measured at an exit of the filter at an instant in time;

t=time; and,

a, b, c and d are coefficients established from empirical testing of a filter within a predetermined configuration of a particle detection system.

8. The method of claim 6 wherein, wherein, the integral function is:

x=∫a ( bS C +dS ) dt×eFR

wherein

FR=Flow Rate of air in the smoke detector, being a constant value;

e is a coefficient established from empirical testing of a given configuration of a particle detection system;

S=detected level of smoke (percentage (%) obscuration/meter) measured at exit of the filter at an instant in time;

t=time; and,

a, b, c and d are coefficients established from empirical testing of a filter within a predetermined configuration of a particle detection system.

9. The method of claim 1 wherein the evaluation of the integral function of the detected level of smoke over time is performed by summation.

10. The method of claim 1 further comprising the steps of:

detecting a level of second particles, having a size indicative of dust particles,

determining a cumulative count over time of the number of detected second particles; and wherein the step of, processing the integrated smoke hours and a predetermined threshold value includes:

determining a combined particle transmittance by combining the cumulative count of detected second particles and the integrated smoke hours;

comparing the combined particle transmittance to at least one of:

a first combined threshold value at which it is predetermined that an amount of smoke particles arrested by the filter has reached a first warning level; and

a second combined threshold value at which, it is predetermined that an amount of smoke arrested by the filter has reached a second warning level; and

wherein the step of sending a signal indicating a fault condition includes:

indicating a first level filter warning when the estimated combined particle transmittance is less than or equal to the first combined threshold value; and

indicating a second level filter warning when the estimated combined particle transmittance is less than or equal to the second combined threshold value.

11. The method of claim 10 wherein, the period of time in which the integration is performed begins at a time at which the smoke detector begins operation with a new filter and continues until, either:

the estimated combined particle transmittance is less than or equal to the first combined threshold value; or,

the estimated combined particle transmittance is less than or equal to the second combined threshold value.

12. A non-transitory computer program product comprising a computer readable medium storing thereon instructions which, when implemented by a processor, cause the processor to indicate particle transmittance of a filter in a smoke detector, by:

evaluating an integral function of detected the level of smoke passing through a detection chamber of the smoke detector to ascertain total integrated smoke hours;

processing the integrated smoke hours and a predetermined threshold value to determine a condition of the filter; and

sending a signal indicating a fault condition when the determined condition of the filter meets at least one predetermined criterion.

13. The non-transitory computer program product of claim 12 which further includes instructions thereon configured to cause the processor to process the integrated smoke hours and a predetermined threshold value by comparing the integrated smoke hours to the predetermined threshold value.

14. The non-transitory computer program product of claim 13 which further includes instructions thereon configured to cause the processor to:

compare the integrated smoke hours to second predetermined threshold value; and;

send a signal indicating a critical fault condition when the total integrated smoke hours exceeds the second predetermined threshold value.

15. The computer non-transitory program product of claim 13 wherein the integral function of the detected level of smoke includes the relationship:

a ( bS C +dS )

where S=detected level of smoke (percentage (%) obscuration/meter) measured at an exit of the filter at an instant in time; and

a, b, c and d are coefficients established from empirical testing of a filter within a predetermined configuration of a particle detection system.

16. The non-transitory computer program product of claim 12 wherein, the integral function is:

x=∫a ( bS C +dS×eFR ) dt

wherein

FR=Flow Rate of air in the smoke detector, being a time varying value;

e is a coefficient established from empirical testing of a given configuration of a particle detection system;

S=detected level of smoke (percentage (%) obscuration/meter) measured at an exit of the filter at an instant in time;

t=time; and,

a, b, c and d are coefficients established from empirical testing of a filter within a predetermined configuration of a particle detection system.

17. The non-transitory computer program product of claim 12 wherein, the integral function is:

x=∫a ( bS C +dS ) dt×eFR

wherein

FR=Flow Rate of air in the smoke detector, being a constant value;

e is a coefficient established from empirical testing of a given configuration of a particle detection system;

S=detected level of smoke (percentage (%) obscuration/meter) measured at exit of the filter at an instant in time;

t=time; and,

a, b, c and d are coefficients established from empirical testing of a filter within a predetermined configuration of a particle detection system.

18. The non-transitory computer program product of claim 12 wherein the evaluation of the integral function of the detected level of smoke over time is performed by summation.

19. The non-transitory computer program product of claim 12 which further includes instructions thereon configured to cause the processor to:

determine a cumulative count over time of a number of detected second particles having a size indicative of dust particles; and,

process the integrated smoke hours and a predetermined threshold value by:

determining a combined particle transmittance by combining the cumulative count of detected second particles and the integrated smoke hours;

comparing the combined particle transmittance to at least one of:

a first combined threshold value at which it is predetermined that an amount of smoke particles arrested by the filter has reached a first warning level; and

comparing the combined particle transmittance to a second combined threshold value at which, it is predetermined that an amount of smoke arrested by the filter has reached a second warning level; and

send a signal indicating a fault condition by:

indicating a first level filter warning when the estimated combined particle transmittance is less than or equal to the first combined threshold value; and

indicating a second level filter warning when the estimated combined particle transmittance is less than or equal to the second combined threshold value.

Assignments (6)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jul 19, 2017
From: NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK
To: XTRALIS TECHNOLOGIES LTD
Reel/Frame 043242/0828 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 7, 2017
From: XTRALIS TECHNOLOGIES LTD
To: GARRETT THERMAL SYSTEMS LIMITED
Reel/Frame 041902/0357 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE ASSIGNEE'S ADDRESS PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 031809 FRAME 0141. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE CORRECT ADDRESS FOR THE ASSIGNEE IS XTRALIS TECHNOLOGIES LTD, 2ND FLOOR, ONE MONTAGUE PLACE, NASSAU, NP N-3933, THE BAHAMAS. Recorded Jul 3, 2014
From: XTRALIS PTY LTD
To: XTRALIS TECHNOLOGIES LTD
Reel/Frame 033275/0616 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 18, 2013
From: XTRALIS PTY LTD
To: XTRALIS TECHNOLOGIES LTD
Reel/Frame 031808/0806 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Dec 18, 2013
From: VISION FIRE & SECURITY PTY LTD
To: XTRALIS PTY LTD
Reel/Frame 031837/0863 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Dec 18, 2013
From: XTRALIS TECHNOLOGIES LTD
To: NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LIMITED
Reel/Frame 031837/0865 →