IP Library Granted Patent US 8,619,546
Granted Patent B2
US 8,619,546 · App. 12/858,050 · Granted Dec 31, 2013

Method and apparatus for coping with link failures in central control plane architectures

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,619,546
App. No.
12/858,050
Granted
Dec 31, 2013
Kind
B2
Abstract

A capability for coping with link failures in central control plane architectures is provided. The capability for coping with link failures enables targeted reporting of link failures within the network in a manner that prevents flooding of link failure messages (LFMs) within the network. A method for reporting a failure of a link associated with a node includes detecting a failure of a link associated with the node, identifying an interface of the node associated with the failed link, identifying, from a flow table of the node, an ingress interface of the node via which a flow intended for the failed link is received, generating an LFM for the identified ingress interface, and sending the LFM via the identified ingress interface. A method for use at a local node having a flow table includes receiving an LFM indicative of a link failure detected at a remote node where the LFM includes a flow definition of a flow received at the remote node from the local node, identifying an interface of the local node via which the LFM is received, identifying from the flow table of the local node an ingress interface of the local node via which a flow intended for the failed link is received, generating a new LFM for the identified ingress interface of the node, and sending the new LFM via the identified ingress interface of the local node.

Claims (56)

1. A method for reporting a failure of a link associated with a node, the method comprising:

detecting a failure of a link associated with the node;

identifying an interface of the node associated with the failed link;

identifying, from a flow table of the node, an ingress interface of the node via which a flow intended for the failed link is received;

generating a link failure message for the identified ingress interface; and

sending the link failure message via the identified ingress interface.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein identifying an ingress interface of the node via which a flow intended for the failed link may be received comprises:

searching the flow table of the node for identifying a flow table entry comprising an Action field indicative that packets of the flow are to be forwarded to the interface of the node associated with the failed link; and

determining the ingress interface from the identified flow table entry.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the ingress interface is determined from an ingress interface field of the identified flow table entry.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the link failure message comprises a Source Address field, a Message Identifier field, a Flow Definition field, a Flow Count field, and at least one Flow Def. # field.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein:

for each flow that is (1) received via the ingress interface via which the link failure message is sent and (2) transmitted via the interface of the node associated with the failed link, the link failure message comprises a definition of the flow.

6. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

for each flow that is (1) received via the ingress interface via which the link failure message is sent and (2) transmitted via the interface of the node associated with the failed link, modifying an Action field of a flow table entry of the flow.

7. The method of claim 6 , wherein modifying the Action field of the flow table entry of the flow comprises one of:

modifying the Action field to indicate that packets for the flow should be dropped by the node; and

modifying the Action field to indicate that packets for the flow should be forwarded, by the node, toward a controller configured for controlling the node.

8. An apparatus for reporting a failure of a link associated with a node, the apparatus comprising:

a processor configured for:

detecting a failure of a link associated with the node;

identifying an interface of the node associated with the failed link;

identifying, from a flow table of the node, an ingress interface of the node via which a flow intended for the failed link may be received;

generating a link failure message for the identified ingress interface; and

sending the link failure message via the identified ingress interface.

9. A method for use at a local node comprising a flow table, the method comprising:

receiving a link failure message indicative of a link failure detected at a remote node, wherein the link failure message comprises a flow definition of a flow received at the remote node from the local node;

identifying an interface of the local node via which the link failure message is received;

identifying, from the flow table of the local node, an ingress interface of the local node via which a flow intended for the failed link is received;

generating a new link failure message for the identified ingress interface of the node; and

sending the new link failure message via the identified ingress interface of the local node.

10. The method of claim 9 , wherein identifying the ingress interface of the local node comprises:

searching the flow table of the node for identifying a flow table entry (1) having an Action field indicative that the flow is forwarded via the identified interface of the local node via which the link failure message is received and (2) having a flow definition matching the flow definition of the flow indicated in the received link failure message; and

determining the ingress interface from the identified flow table entry of the local node.

11. The method of claim 10 , wherein the ingress interface is determined from an ingress interface field of the identified flow table entry.

12. The method of claim 11 , wherein the flow definition of the flow of the received link failure message represents a subset of flows defined in the flow table entry of the local node, the method further comprising:

splitting the flow table entry into two flow table entries;

modifying an Action field of one of the two flow table entries.

13. The method of claim 9 , wherein the received and new link failure messages each comprise a Source Address field, a Message Identifier field, a Flow Definition field, a Flow Count field, and at least one Flow Def. # field.

14. The method of claim 9 , wherein the received link failure message includes a Message Identifier field having a Message Identifier value.

15. The method of claim 14 , wherein the new link failure message includes a Message Identifier field including the Message Identifier value from the Message Identifier field of the received link failure message.

16. The method of claim 9 , wherein:

for each flow that is (1) received via the ingress interface via which the new link failure message is sent and (2) transmitted via the interface of the local node via which the link failure message is received, the new link failure message comprises a definition of the flow.

17. The method of claim 16 , wherein, for each flow, the definition of the flow that is included within the new link failure message is the flow definition from the associated flow table entry of the flow.

18. The method of claim 9 , further comprising:

for each flow (1) received via the ingress interface via which the new link failure message is sent and (2) transmitted via the interface of the local node via which the link failure message is received, modifying an Action field of a flow table entry of the flow.

19. The method of claim 18 , wherein modifying the Action field of the flow table entry of the flow comprises one of:

modifying the Action field to indicate that packets for the flow should be dropped by the local node; and

modifying the action field to indicate that packets for the flow should be forwarded, by the local node, toward a controller configured for controlling the local node.

20. An apparatus for use at a local node comprising a flow table, the apparatus comprising:

a processor configured for:

receiving a link failure message indicative of a link failure detected at a remote node, wherein the link failure message comprises a flow definition of a flow received at the remote node from the local node;

identifying an interface of the local node via which the link failure message is received;

identifying, from the flow table of the local node, an ingress interface of the local node via which a flow intended for the failed link is received;

generating a new link failure message for the identified ingress interface of the node; and

sending the new link failure message via the identified ingress interface of the local node.

Assignments (13)
PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Aug 6, 2024
From: RPX CORPORATION; RPX CLEARINGHOUSE LLC
To: BARINGS FINANCE LLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 068328/0674 →
RELEASE OF LIEN ON PATENTS Recorded Aug 5, 2024
From: BARINGS FINANCE LLC
To: RPX CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 068328/0278 →
PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Apr 22, 2023
From: RPX CORPORATION
To: BARINGS FINANCE LLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 063429/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 28, 2021
From: PROVENANCE ASSET GROUP LLC
To: RPX CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 059352/0001 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 30, 2021
From: NOKIA US HOLDINGS INC.
To: PROVENANCE ASSET GROUP HOLDINGS LLC; PROVENANCE ASSET GROUP LLC
Reel/Frame 058363/0723 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 30, 2021
From: CORTLAND CAPITAL MARKETS SERVICES LLC
To: PROVENANCE ASSET GROUP HOLDINGS LLC; PROVENANCE ASSET GROUP LLC
Reel/Frame 058983/0104 →
ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT Recorded Feb 14, 2019
From: NOKIA USA INC.
To: NOKIA US HOLDINGS INC.
Reel/Frame 048370/0682 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 13, 2017
From: NOKIA TECHNOLOGIES OY; NOKIA SOLUTIONS AND NETWORKS BV; ALCATEL LUCENT SAS
To: PROVENANCE ASSET GROUP LLC
Reel/Frame 043877/0001 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Sep 13, 2017
From: PROVENANCE ASSET GROUP HOLDINGS, LLC; PROVENANCE ASSET GROUP LLC
To: NOKIA USA INC.
Reel/Frame 043879/0001 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Sep 13, 2017
From: PROVENANCE ASSET GROUP HOLDINGS, LLC; PROVENANCE ASSET GROUP, LLC
To: CORTLAND CAPITAL MARKET SERVICES, LLC
Reel/Frame 043967/0001 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Sep 30, 2014
From: CREDIT SUISSE AG
To: ALCATEL LUCENT
Reel/Frame 033868/0555 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 18, 2013
From: ALCATEL-LUCENT USA INC.
To: ALCATEL LUCENT
Reel/Frame 031433/0123 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jan 30, 2013
From: ALCATEL LUCENT
To: CREDIT SUISSE AG
Reel/Frame 029821/0001 →