IP Library Granted Patent US 8,498,459
Granted Patent B2
US 8,498,459 · App. 12/897,845 · Granted Jul 30, 2013

System and method for verifying registration accuracy in digital medical images

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,498,459
App. No.
12/897,845
Granted
Jul 30, 2013
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method of verifying a registration of a digital image includes receiving a reference image and a moving image registered to the reference image representing the same object, selecting one or more landmarks in the images, defining a neighborhood in the domain of each image near each selected landmark, extracting feature sets from the neighborhoods for the reference image and the registered moving image, calculating a total quality measure of the registration of the moving image from a distance metric applied to the feature sets extracted from the neighborhoods of the reference image and the registered moving image, comparing the total quality measure to a threshold determined from a reference atlas for the object represented in the image, and determining whether to accept or reject the registration of the moving image based on the comparison result.

Claims (254)

1. A method of verifying a registration of a digital image, said method comprising the steps of:

receiving a reference image and a moving image that has been registered to said reference image, wherein said reference image and said moving image are representations of a same object, wherein each said image comprises a plurality of intensities defined for a three-dimensional (3D) domain of points;

selecting a symmetry axis in the object represented in the image;

selecting one or more landmarks in said images, and defining a neighborhood in the domain of each image near each selected landmark, said neighborhoods defined to be symmetric about said symmetry axis;

extracting feature sets from the neighborhoods for the reference image and the moving image;

calculating a total quality measure of the registration of the moving image from a distance metric applied to the feature sets extracted from the neighborhoods of the reference image and the registered moving image, wherein said total quality measure is a weighed sum of neighborhood quality measures calculated by applying the distance metric to said feature sets in each neighborhood defined as

q

i

=

d

(

S

ref

+

(

i

)

,

S

mov

+

(

i

)

,

S

ref

-

(

i

)

,

S

mov

-

(

i

)

)

,

wherein d is the distance metric for comparing two sets of data, S mov + (i) and S mov − (i) express the features extracted from each landmark i in their respective neighborhoods of said registered moving image on both sides of the symmetry axis, and S ref + (i) and S ref − (i) express the features extracted from each landmark i in their respective neighborhoods of said reference image on both sides of the symmetry axis;

comparing the total quality measure to a threshold determined from a reference atlas for the object represented in the image; and

determining whether to accept or reject the registration of the moving image based on the comparison result.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein said distance metric is a cross correlation calculated over respective neighborhoods of the registered moving image and the reference image.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein said distance metric is a sum of squared intensity differences calculated over respective neighborhoods of the registered moving image and the reference image.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein said total quality measure is defined as

QM

=

i

n

w

i

·

d

(

S

ref

(

i

)

,

S

mov

(

i

)

)

+

i

,

j

w

ij

2

·

d

(

S

mov

,

j

+

(

x

i

,

y

i

,

z

i

)

,

S

mov

,

j

-

(

x

i

,

y

i

,

z

i

)

)

,

wherein d is said distance metric, the first sum is over the neighborhoods, w i are weights for the neighborhoods, the second sum is over the neighborhoods i for different orientations j about said symmetry axis, w ij are weights for the neighborhoods at orientation j, and sets S mov,j + and S mov,j − are subsets of set S mov (i) at orientation j on respective sides of the symmetry axis.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein said object is a brain, and said symmetry axis is a mid-saggital plane.

6. A non-transitory program storage device readable by a computer, tangibly embodying a program of instructions executable by the computer to perform the method steps for verifying a registration of a digital image, said method comprising the steps of:

receiving a reference image and a moving image that has been registered to said reference image, wherein said reference image and said moving image are representations of a same object, wherein each said image comprises a plurality of intensities defined for a three-dimensional (3D) domain of points;

selecting a symmetry axis in the object represented in the image;

selecting one or more landmarks in said images, and defining a neighborhood in the domain of each image near each selected landmark, said neighborhoods defined to be symmetric about said symmetry axis;

extracting feature sets from the neighborhoods for the reference image and the moving image;

calculating a total quality measure of the registration of the moving image from a distance metric applied to the feature sets extracted from the neighborhoods of the reference image and the registered moving image, wherein said total quality measure is a weighed sum of neighborhood quality measures calculated by applying the distance metric to said feature sets in each neighborhood defined as

q

i

=

d

(

S

ref

+

(

i

)

,

S

mov

+

(

i

)

,

S

ref

-

(

i

)

,

S

mov

-

(

i

)

)

,

wherein d is the distance metric for comparing two sets of data, S mov + (i) and S mov − (i) express the features extracted from each landmark i in their respective neighborhoods of said registered moving image on both sides of the symmetry axis, and S ref + (i) and S ref − (i) express the features extracted from each landmark i in their respective neighborhoods of said reference image on both sides of the symmetry axis;

comparing the total quality measure to a threshold determined from a reference atlas for the object represented in the image; and

determining whether to accept or reject the registration of the moving image based on the comparison result.

7. The computer readable program storage device of claim 6 , wherein said distance metric is a cross correlation calculated over respective neighborhoods of the registered moving image and the reference image.

8. The computer readable program storage device of claim 6 , wherein said distance metric is a sum of squared intensity differences calculated over respective neighborhoods of the registered moving image and the reference image.

9. The computer readable program storage device of claim 6 , wherein said total quality measure is defined as

QM

=

i

n

w

i

·

d

(

S

ref

(

i

)

,

S

mov

(

i

)

)

+

i

,

j

w

ij

2

·

d

(

S

mov

,

j

+

(

x

i

,

y

i

,

z

i

)

,

S

mov

,

j

-

(

x

i

,

y

i

,

z

i

)

)

,

wherein d is said distance metric, the first sum is over the neighborhoods, w i are weights for the neighborhoods, the second sum is over the neighborhoods i for different orientations j about said symmetry axis, w ij are weights for the neighborhoods at orientation j, and sets S mov,j + and S mov,j − are subsets of set S mov (i) at orientation j on respective sides of the symmetry axis.

10. The computer readable program storage device of claim 6 wherein said object is a brain, and said symmetry axis is a mid-saggital plane.

Assignments (3)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 28, 2016
From: SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT
To: SIEMENS HEALTHCARE GMBH
Reel/Frame 039271/0561 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 3, 2014
From: SIEMENS CORPORATION
To: SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT
Reel/Frame 032151/0103 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 9, 2010
From: CHEFD'HOTEL, CHRISTOPHE; ODRY, BENJAMIN L.
To: SIEMENS CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 025483/0713 →