Receipt verification of print jobs in an automated document factory environment
View Patent ↗Methods and systems are provided for verifying the receipt of print jobs submitted to an Automated Document Factory (ADF) system from a client. The ADF system receives a print work summary from the client indicating print jobs scheduled for submission to the ADF system. The ADF system may then receive print jobs from the client. A determination is made regarding the differences between the print jobs received from the client and the print jobs scheduled for submission as indicated in the print work summary. A tracking report is generated indicating the differences, and a notification is provided to the client when the tracking report indicates that a difference exists between the print jobs received from the client and the print jobs indicated in the print work summary.
1. An Automated Document Factory (ADF) system comprising:
a datacenter operable to receive a print work summary from a client indicating print jobs scheduled for submission to the ADF system, and to receive print jobs from the client; and
a tracking system including a memory, the tracking system operable to determine differences between the print jobs received from the client and the print jobs scheduled for submission as indicated in the print work summary, to generate in the memory a tracking report indicating the differences, and to provide notification to the client when the tracking report indicates that a difference exists between the print jobs received from the client and the print jobs indicated in the print work summary.
2. The ADF system of claim 1 wherein:
the print work summary indicates print jobs scheduled for submission during a print cycle, and
the tracking system is further operable to provide notification to the client indicating that the print cycle did not complete successfully when there are differences between the print jobs received from the client during the print cycle and the print jobs scheduled for submission during the print cycle as indicated in the print work summary.
3. The ADF system of claim 1 wherein:
the tracking system is further operable to compare a number of print jobs received from the client and a number of print jobs as indicated in the print work summary to determine the differences.
4. The ADF system of claim 1 wherein:
the tracking system is further operable to compare a number of documents in a print job received from the client and a number of documents for the print job as indicated in the print work summary to determine the differences.
5. The ADF system of claim 1 wherein:
the tracking system is further operable to compare a number of bytes in a print job received from the client and a number of bytes for the print job as indicated in the print work summary to determine the differences.
6. The ADF system of claim 1 wherein:
the tracking system is further operable to compare a Cyclic Redundancy Check (CRC) value calculated for a print job received from the client and a CRC value for the print job as indicated in the print work summary to determine the differences.
7. A method comprising:
receiving, by a datacenter, a print work summary from a client indicating print jobs scheduled for submission to an ADF system;
determining, by a tracking system, differences between print jobs received from the client and the print jobs scheduled for submission as indicated in the print work summary;
generating, by a tracking system, a tracking report indicating the differences; and
providing, by a tracking notification to the client when the tracking report indicates that a difference exists between the print jobs received from the client and the print jobs indicated in the print work summary.
8. The method of claim 7 wherein:
the print work summary indicates print jobs scheduled for submission during a print cycle, and
providing notification further comprises:
providing notification to the client indicating that the print cycle did not complete successfully when there are differences between the print jobs received from the client during the print cycle and the print jobs scheduled for submission during the print cycle as indicated in the print work summary.
9. The method of claim 7 wherein:
determining the differences further comprises:
comparing a number of print jobs received from the client and a number of print jobs as indicated in the print work summary to determine the differences.
10. The method of claim 7 wherein determining the differences further comprises:
comparing a number of documents in a print job received from the client and a number of documents for the print job as indicated in the print work summary to determine the differences.
11. The method of claim 7 wherein determining the differences further comprises:
comparing a number of bytes in a print job received from the client and a number of bytes for the print job as indicated in the print work summary to determine the differences.
12. The method of claim 7 wherein determining the differences further comprises:
comparing a Cyclic Redundancy Check (CRC) value calculated for a print job received from the client and a CRC value for the print job as indicated in the print work summary to determine the differences.
13. A non-transitory computer readable medium tangibly embodying programmed instructions which, when executed by a processor, are operable for performing a method of verifying reception of print jobs at an Automated Document Factory (ADF) system, the method comprising:
receiving a print work summary from a client indicating print jobs scheduled for submission to an ADF system;
determining differences between print jobs received from the client and the print jobs scheduled for submission as indicated in the print work summary;
generating a tracking report indicating the differences; and
providing notification to the client when the tracking report indicates that a difference exists between the print jobs received from the client and the print jobs indicated in the print work summary.
14. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 13 wherein:
the print work summary indicates print jobs scheduled for submission during a print cycle, and
providing notification further comprises:
providing notification to the client indicating that the print cycle did not complete successfully when there are differences between the print jobs received from the client during the print cycle and the print jobs scheduled for submission during the print cycle as indicated in the print work summary.
15. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 13 wherein determining the differences further comprises:
comparing a number of print jobs received from the client and a number of print jobs as indicated in the print work summary to determine the differences.
16. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 13 wherein determining the differences further comprises:
comparing a number of documents in a print job received from the client and a number of documents for the print job as indicated in the print work summary to determine the differences.
17. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 13 wherein determining the differences further comprises:
comparing a number of bytes in a print job received from the client and a number of bytes for the print job as indicated in the print work summary to determine the differences.
18. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 13 wherein determining the differences further comprises:
comparing a Cyclic Redundancy Check (CRC) value calculated for a print job received from the client and a CRC value for the print job as indicated in the print work summary to determine the differences.