IP Library Granted Patent US 8,401,148
Granted Patent B2
US 8,401,148 · App. 12/915,618 · Granted Mar 19, 2013

Non-voxel-based broad-beam (NVBB) algorithm for intensity modulated radiation therapy dose calculation and plan optimization

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,401,148
App. No.
12/915,618
Granted
Mar 19, 2013
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method of calculating a dose distribution for a patient for use in a radiation therapy treatment plan. The method includes acquiring an image of a volume within the patient, defining a radiation source, and defining a reference plane oriented between the radiation source and the patient. The method also includes generating a radiation therapy treatment plan, wherein the plan includes a plurality of rays that extend between the radiation source and the patient volume, and calculating a three-dimensional dose volume for the patient volume from the plurality of rays that intersect the reference plane without first having to independently calculate a dose distribution on each of the plurality of rays. The method can also include displaying the three-dimensional dose volume.

Claims (59)

1. A method of calculating a dose distribution for a patient for use in a radiation therapy treatment plan, the method comprising:

acquiring an image of a volume within the patient;

defining a radiation source;

defining a reference plane oriented between the radiation source and the patient;

generating a radiation therapy treatment plan, the plan including a plurality of rays that extend between the radiation source and the patient volume;

calculating a three-dimensional dose volume for the patient volume from the plurality of rays that intersect the reference plane without first having to independently calculate a dose distribution on each of the plurality of rays; and

displaying the three-dimensional dose volume.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the patient volume is continuous for the calculation of the three-dimensional dose volume for the patient volume.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the patient volume is non-voxeled for the calculation of the three-dimensional dose volume for the patient volume.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein at least one of the plurality of rays is pyramidal-shaped.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein each of the plurality of rays is defined in a beam-eye-view coordinate system.

6. The method of claim 1 , further comprising generating an initial set of machine parameters and wherein calculating the three-dimensional dose volume for the patient volume is based on the initial set of machine parameters.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein calculating the three-dimensional dose distribution includes:

defining a plurality of points based on the reference plane, the beam-eye-view plane defined by the plurality rays and being perpendicular to a line joining the radiation source and a radiation isocenter and being located a predetermined distance from the radiation source; and

calculating a dose for each of the plurality of points.

8. The method of claim 7 , wherein calculating a dose for each of the plurality of points includes:

determining a central axis contribution, a divergence correction, and a lateral spread function for a dose at each of the plurality of points, and

multiplying the central axis contribution, the divergence correction term, and the lateral correction term to determine the dose at each of the plurality of points.

9. The method of claim 7 , further comprising interpolating the dose for each of the plurality of points to Cartesian grid points.

10. The method of claim 1 , further comprising optimizing the three-dimensional dose volume.

11. The method of claim 10 , wherein optimizing the three-dimensional dose volume includes:

(a) evaluating an objective functional based on the three-dimensional dose volume;

(b) calculating a first derivative of the objective functional;

(c) updating the initial set of machine parameters based on the objective functional; and

(d) repeating acts (a) through (c) at least one time.

12. The method of claim 11 , wherein calculating a first derivative of the objective functional includes performing non-voxel, broad-beam based ray tracing.

13. The method of claim 11 , wherein repeating acts (a) through (c) at least one time includes repeating act (a) through (c) until the updated set of machine parameters substantially satisfy at least one clinical goal.

14. The method of claim 11 , further comprising performing steps (a) through (d) in substantially real-time.

15. The method of claim 10 , wherein optimizing the three-dimensional dose volume includes optimizing the three-dimensional dose volume based on at least one machine parameter.

16. The method of claim 15 , wherein the at least one machine parameter includes a collimator jaw position.

17. The method of claim 15 , wherein the at least one machine parameter includes a collimator leaf position.

18. The method of claim 15 , wherein the at least one machine parameter includes at least one of a gantry angle, a gantry speed, a couch position, a couch speed, a leaf open time, and a linac output.

19. A method of optimizing a dose distribution for a patient for use in a radiation therapy treatment plan, the method comprising:

(a) acquiring an image of a volume within the patient;

(b) generating a radiation therapy treatment plan, the plan including a plurality of rays that extend between a radiation source and the patient volume;

(c) generating an initial set of machine parameters;

(d) calculating a three-dimensional dose volume based on the initial set of machine parameters and the patient volume, the calculation further based on the plurality of rays that intersect the reference plane without first having to independently calculate a dose distribution on each of the plurality of rays;

(e) evaluating an objective functional based on the three-dimensional dose volume;

(f) calculating a first derivative of the objective functional;

(g) updating the initial set of machine parameters based on the objective functional;

(h) repeating acts (d) through (g) at least one time; and

(i) displaying the three-dimensional dose volume.

20. The method of claim 19 , wherein calculating a first derivative of the objective functional includes performing non-voxel, broad-beam based ray tracing.

21. The method of claim 19 , wherein repeating acts (d) through (g) at least one time includes repeating act (d) through (g) until the updated set of machine parameters substantially satisfy at least one clinical goal.

22. The method of claim 19 , further comprising performing steps (a) through (h) in substantially real-time.

23. The method of claim 19 , wherein the initial set of machine parameters includes a collimator jaw position.

24. The method of claim 19 , wherein the initial set of machine parameters includes a collimator leaf position.

25. The method of claim 19 , wherein the initial set of machine parameters includes at least one of a gantry angle, a gantry speed, a couch position, a couch speed, a leaf open time, and a linac output.

26. The method of claim 19 , wherein the patient volume is continuous for the calculation of the three-dimensional dose volume for the patient volume.

27. The method of claim 19 , wherein the patient volume is non-voxeled for the calculation of the three-dimensional dose volume for the patient volume.

28. The method of claim 19 , wherein at least one of the plurality of rays is pyramidal-shaped.

29. The method of claim 19 , wherein each of the plurality of rays is defined in a beam-eye-view coordinate system.

30. The method of claim 19 , wherein calculating the three-dimensional dose distribution includes:

defining a plurality of points based on the reference plane, the beam-eye-view plane defined by the plurality rays and being perpendicular to a line joining the radiation source and a radiation isocenter and being located a predetermined distance from the radiation source; and

calculating a dose for each of the plurality of points.

31. The method of claim 30 , wherein calculating a dose for each of the plurality of points includes:

determining a central axis contribution, a divergence correction, and a lateral spread function for a dose at each of the plurality of points, and

multiplying the central axis contribution, the divergence correction term, and the lateral correction term to determine the dose at each of the plurality of points.

32. The method of claim 30 , further comprising interpolating the dose for each of the plurality of points to Cartesian grid points.

Assignments (12)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 8, 2025
From: ACCURAY INCORPORATED
To: ACCURAY LLC
Reel/Frame 072189/0891 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jun 6, 2025
From: FIRST-CITIZENS BANK & TRUST COMPANY
To: ACCURAY INCORPORATED
Reel/Frame 071638/0034 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 11, 2023
From: TOMOTHERAPY INCORPORATED
To: ACCURAY INCORPORATED
Reel/Frame 064218/0337 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded May 20, 2021
From: MIDCAP FINANCIAL TRUST
To: ACCURAY INCORPORATED; TOMOTHERAPY INCORPORATED
Reel/Frame 056318/0751 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded May 20, 2021
From: MIDCAP FUNDING IV TRUST (AS SUCCESSOR BY ASSIGNMENT FROM MIDCAP FUNDING X TRUST, AS SUCCESSOR BY ASSIGNMENT FROM MIDCAP FUNDING IV TRUST, AS SUCCESSOR BY ASSIGNMENT FROM MIDCAP FINANCIAL TRUST)
To: ACCURAY INCORPORATED; TOMOTHERAPY INCORPORATED
Reel/Frame 056318/0559 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded May 14, 2021
From: ACCURAY INCORPORATED; TOMOTHERAPY INCORPORATED
To: SILICON VALLEY BANK, AS ADMINISTRATIVE AND COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 056247/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF SECURITY AGREEMENTS Recorded Mar 1, 2019
From: MIDCAP FUNDING X TRUST (AS SUCCESSOR BY ASSIGNMENT FROM MIDCAP FUNDING IV TRUST, AS SUCCESSOR BY ASSIGNMENT FROM MIDCAP FINANCIAL TRUST), AS EXISTING ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
To: MIDCAP FUNDING IV TRUST, AS SUCCESSOR TO EXISTING ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Reel/Frame 048481/0804 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Dec 19, 2017
From: ACCURAY INCORPORATED; TOMOTHERAPY INCORPORATED
To: MIDCAP FINANCIAL TRUST
Reel/Frame 044910/0685 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jun 15, 2017
From: ACCURAY INCORPORATED; TOMOTHERAPY INCORPORATED
To: MIDCAP FUNDING IV TRUST (AS SUCCESSOR BY ASSIGNMENT FROM MIDCAP FINANCIAL TRUST)
Reel/Frame 042826/0358 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jun 15, 2017
From: CERBERUS BUSINESS FINANCE, LLC. AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: ACCURAY INCORPORATED; TOMOTHERAPY INCORPORATED
Reel/Frame 042821/0580 →
ASSIGNMENT FOR SECURITY - PATENTS Recorded Jan 13, 2016
From: ACCURAY INCORPORATED; TOMOTHERAPY INCORPORATED
To: CERBERUS BUSINESS FINANCE, LLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 037513/0170 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 8, 2011
From: LU, WEIGUO; CHEN, MINGLI; CHEN, QUAN; RUCHALA, KENNETH J.
To: TOMOTHERAPY INCORPORATED
Reel/Frame 025759/0678 →