IP Library Granted Patent US 8,680,815
Granted Patent B2
US 8,680,815 · App. 12/916,743 · Granted Mar 25, 2014

Method and apparatus for assessing battery state of health

Inventors: John S. Wang (Los Angeles, CA); Ping Liu (Irvine, CA); Shuoqin Wang (Westlake, CA); Souren Soukiazian (Burbank, CA); Mark W. Verbrugge (Troy, MI)
Assignee: GM Global Technology Operations LLC
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,680,815
App. No.
12/916,743
Granted
Mar 25, 2014
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for monitoring a lithium-ion battery cell includes monitoring a battery cell voltage and a corresponding charge capacity of the battery cell during an electric power event which may include either an electric power charge event or an electric power discharge event. A measured charge-capacity-derivative is determined by differentiating the charge capacity in relation to the corresponding battery cell voltage during the electric power event. The measured charge-capacity-derivative is compared with a preferred anode charge-capacity-derivative of an anode charge curve (for electric power discharge events) or an anode discharge curve (for electric power charge events), and with a preferred cathode charge-capacity-derivative of a cathode charge curve (for electric power charge events) or a cathode discharge charge curve (for electric power discharge events). A first state of health parameter of the battery cell corresponding to the comparison of the measured charge-capacity-derivative with the preferred anode charge-capacity-derivative of the anode curve is determined. And, a second state of health parameter of the battery cell corresponding to the comparison of the measured charge-capacity-derivative with the preferred cathode charge-capacity-derivative of the cathode curve is determined.

Claims (53)

1. Method for monitoring a lithium-ion battery cell, comprising:

monitoring battery cell voltage and a corresponding charge capacity of the battery cell during an electric power event comprising one of an electric power charge event and an electric power discharge event;

determining a measured charge-capacity-derivative by differentiating the charge capacity in relation to the corresponding battery cell voltage during the electric power event;

comparing the measured charge-capacity-derivative with a preferred anode charge-capacity-derivative of an anode curve;

comparing the measured charge-capacity-derivative with a preferred cathode charge-capacity-derivative of a cathode curve;

determining a first state of health parameter of the battery cell corresponding to the comparison of the measured charge-capacity-derivative with the preferred anode charge-capacity-derivative of the anode curve; and

determining a second state of health parameter of the battery cell corresponding to the comparison of the measured charge-capacity-derivative with the preferred cathode charge-capacity-derivative of the cathode curve.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein:

said electric power event comprises an electric power discharge event;

said anode curve comprises an anode charge curve; and

said cathode curve a cathode discharge curve.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein comparing the measured charge-capacity-derivative with the preferred anode charge-capacity-derivative of the anode charge curve comprises:

identifying measured signature peaks of the measured charge-capacity-derivative; and

determining a total measured anode capacity comprising a charge capacity difference between the measured signature peaks of the measured charge-capacity-derivative.

4. The method of claim 3 , further comprising

identifying preferred signature peaks of the preferred anode charge-capacity-derivative of the anode charge curve; and

determining a preferred total anode capacity comprising a charge capacity difference between the preferred signature peaks of the preferred anode charge-capacity-derivative;

wherein determining the first state of health parameter of the battery cell corresponding to the comparison of the measured charge-capacity-derivative with the preferred anode charge-capacity-derivative of the anode charge curve comprises determining a total graphite anode capacity by comparing the total measured anode capacity and the preferred total anode capacity.

5. The method of claim 2 , wherein comparing the measured charge-capacity-derivative with the preferred anode charge-capacity-derivative of the anode charge curve comprises:

identifying preferred signature peaks of the preferred anode charge-capacity-derivative;

identifying measured signature peaks of the measured charge-capacity-derivative; and

determining a shift in the measured signature peaks relative to the preferred signature peaks.

6. The method of claim 5 , wherein determining the first state of health parameter of the battery cell corresponding to the comparison of the measured charge-capacity-derivative with the preferred anode charge-capacity-derivative of the anode charge curve comprises determining a magnitude of lithium loss and total capacity loss of the battery cell corresponding to the shift in the measured signature peaks relative to the preferred signature peaks.

7. The method of claim 2 , wherein comparing the measured charge-capacity-derivative with the preferred cathode charge-capacity-derivative of the cathode discharge curve comprises:

determining a charge-capacity-derivative for a cathode voltage response based upon the comparison of the measured charge-capacity-derivative with the preferred anode charge-capacity-derivative; and

comparing the charge-capacity-derivative for the cathode voltage response with the preferred cathode charge-capacity-derivative.

8. The method of claim 2 , wherein the electric power discharge event comprises a discharge of the battery cell from a state of charge greater than 80% to a state of charge less than 20%.

9. The method of claim 2 , wherein comparing the measured charge-capacity-derivative with the preferred anode charge-capacity-derivative of the anode charge curve comprises comparing the measured charge-capacity-derivative with an anode charge-capacity-derivative of an anode charge curve for a new battery cell, the anode charge-capacity-derivative of the anode charge curve for the new battery cell determined by measuring battery parameters correlated to the anode against a lithium electrode during a discharge event of the new battery cell.

10. The method of claim 2 , wherein comparing the measured charge-capacity-derivative with the preferred cathode charge-capacity-derivative of the cathode discharge curve comprises comparing the measured charge-capacity-derivative with a cathode charge-capacity-derivative of a cathode discharge curve for a new battery cell, the cathode charge-capacity-derivative of the cathode discharge curve for the new battery cell determined by measuring battery parameters correlated to the cathode against a lithium electrode during a discharge event of the new battery cell.

11. The method of claim 2 , wherein comparing the measured charge-capacity-derivative with the preferred cathode charge-capacity-derivative of the cathode discharge curve comprises integrating the measured charge-capacity-derivative, integrating the preferred cathode charge-capacity-derivative of the cathode discharge curve, and comparing the integrated measured charge-capacity-derivative with the integrated preferred cathode charge-capacity-derivative of the cathode discharge curve.

12. The method of claim 1 , wherein:

said electric power event comprises an electric power charge event;

said anode curve comprises an anode discharge curve; and

said cathode curve comprises a cathode charge curve.

13. The method of claim 12 , wherein comparing the measured charge-capacity-derivative with the preferred anode charge-capacity-derivative of the anode discharge curve comprises:

identifying measured signature peaks of the measured charge-capacity-derivative; and

determining a total measured anode capacity comprising a charge capacity difference between the measured signature peaks of the measured charge-capacity-derivative.

14. The method of claim 13 , further comprising

identifying preferred signature peaks of the preferred anode charge-capacity-derivative of the anode discharge curve; and

determining a preferred total anode capacity comprising a charge capacity difference between the preferred signature peaks of the preferred anode charge-capacity-derivative;

wherein determining the first state of health parameter of the battery cell corresponding to the comparison of the measured charge-capacity-derivative with the preferred anode charge-capacity-derivative of the anode discharge curve comprises determining a total graphite anode capacity by comparing the total measured anode capacity and the preferred total anode capacity.

15. The method of claim 12 , wherein comparing the measured charge-capacity-derivative with the preferred anode charge-capacity-derivative of the anode discharge curve comprises:

identifying preferred signature peaks of the preferred anode charge-capacity-derivative;

identifying measured signature peaks of the measured charge-capacity-derivative; and

determining a shift in the measured signature peaks relative to the preferred signature peaks.

16. The method of claim 15 , wherein determining the first state of health parameter of the battery cell corresponding to the comparison of the measured charge-capacity-derivative with the preferred anode charge-capacity-derivative of the anode discharge curve comprises determining a magnitude of lithium loss and total capacity loss of the battery cell corresponding to the shift in the measured signature peaks relative to the preferred signature peaks.

17. The method of claim 12 , wherein comparing the measured charge-capacity-derivative with the preferred cathode charge-capacity-derivative of the cathode charge curve comprises:

determining a charge-capacity-derivative for a cathode voltage response based upon the comparison of the measured charge-capacity-derivative with the preferred anode charge-capacity-derivative; and

comparing the charge-capacity-derivative for the cathode voltage response with the preferred cathode charge-capacity-derivative.

18. The method of claim 12 , wherein the electric power charge event comprises a charge of the battery cell from a state of charge less than 20% to a state of charge greater than 80%.

19. The method of claim 12 , wherein comparing the measured charge-capacity-derivative with the preferred anode charge-capacity-derivative of the anode discharge curve comprises comparing the measured charge-capacity-derivative with an anode charge-capacity-derivative of an anode discharge curve for a new battery cell, the anode charge-capacity-derivative of the anode discharge curve for the new battery cell determined by measuring battery parameters correlated to the anode against a lithium electrode during a charge event of the new battery cell.

20. The method of claim 12 , wherein comparing the measured charge-capacity-derivative with the preferred cathode charge-capacity-derivative of the cathode charge curve comprises comparing the measured charge-capacity-derivative with a cathode charge-capacity-derivative of a cathode charge curve for a new battery cell, the cathode charge-capacity-derivative of the cathode charge curve for the new battery cell determined by measuring battery parameters correlated to the cathode against a lithium electrode during a charge event of the new battery cell.

21. The method of claim 12 , wherein comparing the measured charge-capacity-derivative with the preferred anode charge-capacity-derivative of the anode charge curve comprises integrating the measured charge-capacity-derivative, integrating the preferred anode charge-capacity-derivative of the anode charge curve, and comparing the integrated measured charge-capacity-derivative with the integrated preferred anode charge-capacity-derivative of the anode charge curve.

Assignments (4)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 7, 2014
From: WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC
Reel/Frame 034287/0159 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jun 24, 2011
From: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC
To: WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY
Reel/Frame 026499/0267 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Feb 10, 2011
From: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC
Reel/Frame 025780/0482 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 30, 2010
From: WANG, JOHN S.; LIU, PING; WANG, SHUOQIN; SOUKIAZIAN, SOUREN; VERBRUGGE, MARK W.
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 025430/0657 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20120105069A1 · May 3, 2012