IP Library Granted Patent US 8,225,203
Granted Patent B2
US 8,225,203 · App. 12/939,918 · Granted Jul 17, 2012

Spell-check for a keyboard system with automatic correction

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,225,203
App. No.
12/939,918
Granted
Jul 17, 2012
Kind
B2
Abstract

User input is received, specifying a continuous traced path across a keyboard presented on a touch sensitive display. An input sequence is resolved, including traced keys and auxiliary keys proximate to the traced keys by prescribed criteria. For each of one or more candidate entries of a prescribed vocabulary, a set-edit-distance metric is computed between said input sequence and the candidate entry. Various rules specify when penalties are imposed, or not, in computing the set-edit-distance metric. Candidate entries are ranked and displayed according to the computed metric.

Claims (64)

1. A text input apparatus, comprising:

a display including a touch sensitive display surface;

digital data storage containing a vocabulary database including multiple vocabulary entries; and

coupled to the display and the storage, a processor programmed to perform operations comprising:

directing the display to show an arrangement of keys, each key representing one or more characters;

via the display surface, receiving user input comprising a single continuous trace contacting multiple of the keys in an order, including a start key, an end key, and any intervening keys between the start key and the end key;

defining an input sequence including the contacted keys and also including any auxiliary keys comprising keys exhibiting prescribed proximity to the contacted keys;

comparing the input sequence to candidate entries from the vocabulary, including the following operations for each candidate entry:

computing a set-edit-distance metric to calculate a matching metric between said input sequence and the candidate entry;

where:

the set-edit-distance computation imposes a penalty for, omitting from the candidate word all keys from a first group comprising the start key and auxiliary keys to the start key;

the set-edit-distance computation imposes a penalty for omitting from the candidate word all keys from a second group comprising the end key and auxiliary keys to the end key;

the set-edit-distance computation imposes a penalty for omitting from the candidate word all keys from a third group comprising any contacted keys and their auxiliaries where at least a prescribed minimum change in direction of the trace occurs;

the set-edit-distance computation does not impose any penalty for omitting from the candidate word any key of the input sequence outside all of the first, second, and third groups; and

the set-edit-distance computation does not impose any penalty for using any key in the input sequence twice or more in succession in the candidate word; and

ranking the candidate words according to criteria including at least the computed set-edit-distance metric, and providing an output of at least some of the ranked candidate words.

2. The apparatus of claim 1 , where:

the set-edit-distance computation does not impose any penalty for a candidate word including characters of a prescribed group comprising any of: punctuation, digits, and symbols.

3. The apparatus of claim 1 , where:

the operations further include computing a keyboard-geometry-based probability in association with each computed set-edit-distance metric;

using the computed probability to break ties between similarly ranked candidate words.

4. The apparatus of claim 3 , where:

for each of the intervening keys, the keyboard-geometry-based probability is reduced according to speed at which the traced passed over the intervening key.

5. The apparatus of claim 3 , where:

the keyboard-geometry-based probability of a given key varies with radius of the key from a point on the trace.

6. The apparatus of claim 3 , where:

the keyboard-geometry-based probability of a given key varies according to area of the given key intersecting a prescribed rectangular touch area centered upon a contacted key nearest to the given key.

7. The apparatus of claim 1 , where:

the ranking operation is conducted so as to rank candidate words according criteria including the set-edit-distance metric and a language-model-based probability.

8. The apparatus of claim 1 , where the operations further include:

tracking free cost adds and deletes and using the tracked free cost adds and deletes to break ties between similarly ranked candidate words.

9. The apparatus of claim 1 , where the operations further include:

computing stem-edit-distance and using the computed stem-edit-distance to break ties between similarly ranked candidate words.

10. A method, comprising operations of:

directing a display to show an arrangement of keys, each key representing one or more characters, where the display includes a touch sensitive surface;

via the display surface, receiving user input comprising a single continuous trace contacting multiple of the keys in an order, including a start key, an end key, and any intervening keys between the start key and the end key;

defining an input sequence including the contacted keys and also including any auxiliary keys comprising keys exhibiting prescribed proximity to the contacted keys;

comparing the input sequence to candidate entries from a vocabulary containing multiple vocabulary entries, the comparing operation including the following operations for each candidate entry: computing a set-edit-distance metric to calculate a matching metric between said input sequence and the candidate entry;

where:

the set-edit-distance computation imposes a penalty for omitting from the candidate word all keys from a first group comprising the start key and auxiliary keys to the start key;

the set-edit-distance computation imposes a penalty for omitting from the candidate word all keys from a second group comprising the end key and auxiliary keys to the end key;

the set-edit-distance computation imposes a penalty for omitting from the candidate word all keys from a third group comprising any contacted keys and their auxiliaries where at least a prescribed minimum change in direction of the trace occurs;

the set-edit-distance computation does not impose any penalty for omitting from the candidate word any key of the input sequence outside all of the first, second, and third groups; and

the set-edit-distance computation does not impose any penalty for using any key in the input sequence twice or more in succession in the candidate word; and

ranking the candidate words according to criteria including at least the computed set-edit-distance metric, and providing an output of at least some of the ranked candidate words;

where at least one of the operations is performed by a processor.

11. The method of claim 10 , where:

the set-edit-distance computation does not impose any penalty for a candidate word including characters of a prescribed group comprising any of: punctuation, digits, and symbols.

12. The method of claim 10 , where:

the operations further include computing a keyboard-geometry-based probability in association with each computed set-edit-distance metric;

using the computed probability to break ties between similarly ranked candidate words.

13. The method of claim 12 , where:

for each of the intervening keys, the keyboard-geometry-based probability is reduced according to speed at which the trace passed over the intervening key.

14. The method of claim 12 , where:

the keyboard-geometry-based probability of a given key varies with radius of the key from a point on the trace.

15. The method of claim 12 , where:

the keyboard-geometry-based probability of a given key varies according to area of the given key intersecting a prescribed rectangular touch area centered upon a contacted key nearest to the given key.

16. The method of claim 10 , where:

the ranking operation is conducted so as to rank candidate words according to criteria including set-edit-distance metric and a language-model-based probability.

17. The method of claim 10 , where the operations further include:

tracking free cost adds and deletes and using the tracked free cost adds and deletes to break ties between similarly ranked candidate words.

18. The method of claim 10 , where the operations further include:

computing stem-edit-distance and using the computed stem-edit-distance to break ties between similarly ranked candidate words.

19. An article of manufacture comprising at least one medium of digital data storage containing non-transitory storage of a program executable by a processor to perform the operations of claim 10 .

Assignments (9)
RELEASE (REEL 052935 / FRAME 0584) Recorded Jan 2, 2025
From: WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
To: CERENCE OPERATING COMPANY
Reel/Frame 069797/0818 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE REPLACE THE CONVEYANCE DOCUMENT WITH THE NEW ASSIGNMENT PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 050836 FRAME: 0191. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT. Recorded Apr 19, 2022
From: NUANCE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
To: CERENCE OPERATING COMPANY
Reel/Frame 059804/0186 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jun 15, 2020
From: CERENCE OPERATING COMPANY
To: WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
Reel/Frame 052935/0584 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jun 12, 2020
From: BARCLAYS BANK PLC
To: CERENCE OPERATING COMPANY
Reel/Frame 052927/0335 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Nov 7, 2019
From: CERENCE OPERATING COMPANY
To: BARCLAYS BANK PLC
Reel/Frame 050953/0133 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE ASSIGNEE NAME PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 050836 FRAME: 0191. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AGREEMENT. Recorded Oct 29, 2019
From: NUANCE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
To: CERENCE OPERATING COMPANY
Reel/Frame 050871/0001 →
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AGREEMENT Recorded Oct 23, 2019
From: NUANCE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
To: CERENCE INC.
Reel/Frame 050836/0191 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 23, 2014
From: TEGIC INC.
To: NUANCE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 032122/0269 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 24, 2011
From: UNRUH, ERLAND
To: NUANCE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 026015/0366 →