IP Library Granted Patent US 8,862,498
Granted Patent B2
US 8,862,498 · App. 12/941,638 · Granted Oct 14, 2014

Response attribution valuation

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,862,498
App. No.
12/941,638
Granted
Oct 14, 2014
Kind
B2
Abstract

A computer-implemented method is described for determining a response attribution value that represents a credit assignment to a communication, for an associated response received from a recipient during a marketing campaign.

Claims (56)

1. A computer hardware system, comprising:

at least one processor, wherein the at least one processor is configured to initiate and/or perform:

generating a set of stimulus-response pairs by pairing each individual stimuli from a plurality of stimulus with each individual response from a plurality of response; and

calculating, for each pair in the set of stimulus-response pairs, a response attribution value, wherein

the response attribution value is based upon a combination of a first model and a second model,

the first model is a response rate model, and

the second model is a time delay model that weights output of the first model based on an amount of time delay between a stimuli and a response.

2. The system of claim 1 , wherein

the response attribution value represents a likelihood that the stimuli caused the response.

3. The system of claim 1 , wherein

the first model is automatically selected, for a particular stimulus-response pair, from a plurality of first models based upon a type of response in the particular stimulus-response pair.

4. The system of claim 1 , wherein

the second model is based upon a power law distribution.

5. The system of claim 4 , wherein

the first model generates a first response attribution value, and

the second model generates power law parameters using the first response attribution value from the first model.

6. The system of claim 5 , wherein

the power law parameters include:

a minimum time before the response is received, and

a rate at which responses are received as a function of time.

7. The system of claim 5 , wherein

the power law parameters for the stimuli are based upon a particular channel associated with the stimuli.

8. The system of claim 1 , wherein

a single response causes response attribution values for multiple stimulus to receive credit.

9. The system of claim 8 , wherein

the credit for the single response is differently weighted across the multiple stimulus.

10. The system of claim 1 , wherein

the first model is based on a user definition of the response for the stimuli.

11. A computer program product, comprising:

a computer readable storage medium, the computer readable storage medium including instructions for causing a computer to perform:

generating a set of stimulus-response pairs by pairing each individual stimuli from a plurality of stimulus with each individual response from a plurality of response; and

calculating, for each pair in the set of stimulus-response pairs, a response attribution value, wherein

the response attribution value is based upon a combination of a first model and a second model,

the first model is a response rate model, and

the second model is a time delay model that weights output of the first model based on an amount of time delay between a stimuli and a response.

12. The computer program product of claim 11 , wherein

the response attribution value represents a likelihood that the stimuli caused the response.

13. The computer program product of claim 11 , wherein

the first model is automatically selected, for a particular stimulus-response pair, from a plurality of first models based upon a type of response in the particular stimulus-response pair.

14. The computer program product of claim 1 , wherein

the second model is based upon a power law distribution.

15. The computer program product of claim 14 , wherein

the first model generates a first response attribution value, and

the second model generates power law parameters using the first response attribution value from the first model.

16. The computer program product of claim 15 , wherein

the power law parameters include:

a minimum time before the response is received, and

a rate at which responses are received as a function of time.

17. The computer program product of claim 15 , wherein

the power law parameters for the stimuli are based upon a particular channel associated with the stimuli.

18. The computer program product of claim 11 , wherein

a single response causes response attribution values for multiple stimulus to receive credit.

19. The computer program product of claim 18 , wherein

the credit for the single response is differently weighted across the multiple stimulus.

20. The computer program product of claim 11 , wherein

the first model is based on a user definition of the response for the stimuli.

Assignments (3)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 13, 2019
From: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
To: HCL TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED
Reel/Frame 050374/0546 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 26, 2013
From: UNICA CORPORATION
To: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 030690/0128 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 9, 2010
From: CRITES, ROBERT; KENNEDY, RUBY
To: UNICA CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 025338/0758 →