IP Library Granted Patent US 8,655,010
Granted Patent B2
US 8,655,010 · App. 13/000,698 · Granted Feb 18, 2014

Video-based system and method for fire detection

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,655,010
App. No.
13/000,698
Granted
Feb 18, 2014
Kind
B2
Abstract

A video recognition system detects the presence of fire based on video data provided by one or more video detectors, but suppresses the triggering of an alarm in situations based on the selection of acceptable regions and application of rules associated with each acceptable region. A user defines acceptable regions within the field of view of the video detector and associates with each acceptable region a rule. During processing of video data associated with the field of view, video metrics are calculated and analyzed to detect the presence of fire (e.g., flame or smoke). Prior to triggering an alarm, regions identified as indicative of fire are compared with the user-defined acceptable regions. If there is overlap between the two regions, the rule associated with the acceptable region is applied to determine whether the alarm should be suppressed or triggered.

Claims (46)

1. A method of suppressing false alarms associated with video-based fire detection, the method comprising:

defining acceptable regions within a field of view of a video detector;

associating a set of rules with each of the defined acceptable regions;

analyzing video data comprised of one or more frames captured from all regions in the field of view of the video detector;

identifying regions within the field of view of the video detector indicative of fire based on the acquired video data;

detecting overlap between the regions identified as indicative of fire and the defined acceptable regions; and

applying the set of rules associated with the acceptable region detected to overlap with the region identified as indicative of fire to determine whether an alarm should be triggered or suppressed, wherein the set of rules comprises a rule to trigger the alarm when no overlap is detected between the regions indicative of fire and the defined acceptable regions.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein a user defines location and size of the acceptable region within the field of view of the video detector.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein identifying regions within the field of view of the detector includes:

calculating video metrics associated with each region within the field of view of the video detector, including the defined acceptable regions.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the rule associated with the acceptable region dictates that if a region identified as indicative of smoke only partially overlaps the acceptable region then the alarm should be suppressed.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the rule associated with the acceptable region dictates that if a region that does not overlap the acceptable region is identified as indicative of smoke can be correlated with a region that does overlap the acceptable region that is identified as indicative of smoke, then the alarm should be suppressed.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the rule associated with the acceptable region dictates that if a region identified as indicative of flame only partially overlaps the acceptable region then the alarm should be suppressed.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the rule associated with the acceptable region dictates that if a region that does not overlap the acceptable region is identified as indicative of flame can be correlated with a region that does overlap the acceptable region that is identified as indicative of flame, then the alarm should be suppressed.

8. A system for detecting the presence of fire, the system comprising:

a frame buffer operably connectable to receive video data comprised of a plurality of individual frames and to store the received video data;

a calculator that calculates one or more metrics associated with the received video data;

a detector that analyzes all regions within the received video data and determines based on the calculated metrics whether regions within the received video data is indicative of the presence of fire,

an acceptable region defined by a user with respect to a field of view defined by the video data, including a set of rules associated with the acceptable region for determining whether to trigger or suppress an alarm based on interaction between the acceptable region and the region identified as indicative of fire, the set of rules comprising a rule to trigger the alarm when no overlap is detected between the regions indicative of fire and the defined acceptable region; and

an alarm suppressor that compares the user-defined acceptable region with regions identified as indicative of fire and applies the set of rules defined with respect to the acceptable region to determine whether the alarm should be triggered or suppressed.

9. The system of claim 8 , further including:

a graphical user interface displayed to a user that allows a user to define visually with respect to the field of view a location and size of the acceptable regions.

10. The system of claim 9 , wherein the graphical user interface includes a drop-down menu that allows a user to select from a plurality of available rules associated with the acceptable region.

11. The system of claim 10 , wherein the drop-down menu includes for selection a rule that states that if a region identified as containing smoke is adjacent to, but not completely overlapping the acceptable region, then suppress the alarm.

12. The system of claim 10 , wherein the drop-down menu includes for selection a rule that states that if a region that does not overlap the acceptable region is identified as indicative of smoke can be correlated with a region that does overlap the acceptable region that is identified as indicative of smoke, then the alarm should be suppressed.

13. The system of claim 10 , wherein the drop-down menu includes for selection a rule that states that if a region identified as containing flame is adjacent to, but not completely overlapping the acceptable region, then suppress the alarm.

14. The system of claim 10 , wherein the drop-down menu includes for selection a rule that states that if a region that does not overlap the acceptable region is identified as indicative of flame can be correlated with a region that does overlap the acceptable region that is identified as indicative of flame, then the alarm should be suppressed.

15. A system for detecting the presence of fire, the system comprising:

means for defining acceptable regions within a field of view of a video detector;

means for associating one or more rules with each of the defined acceptable regions;

means for analyzing video data comprised of one or more frames captured from all regions in the field of view of the video detector;

means for identifying regions within the field of view of the video detector indicative of fire based on the acquired video data;

means for detecting overlap between the regions identified as indicative of fire and the defined acceptable regions; and

means for applying the rule associated with the acceptable region detected to overlap with the region identified as indicative of fire to determine whether an alarm should be triggered or suppressed, wherein the set of rules comprises a rule to trigger the alarm when no overlap is detected between the regions indicative of fire and the defined acceptable regions.

16. The system of claim 15 , wherein the means for defining acceptable regions includes a graphical user interface (GUI) that allows a user to define visually a location and size of the acceptable region within the field of view of the video detector.

17. The system of claim 15 , wherein the means for associating one or more rules with each of the defined acceptable regions includes a drop-down menu that provides a plurality of available rules which may be associated with the defined acceptable regions.

18. A method of suppressing false alarms associated with video-based fire detection, the method comprising:

defining acceptable regions within a field of view of a video detector;

associating a set of rules with each of the defined acceptable regions;

analyzing video data comprised of one or more frames from the video detector captured from all regions in the field of view of the video detector;

identifying regions within the field of view of the video detector indicative of fire based on the acquired video data;

detecting a correlation between the regions identified as indicative of fire and the defined acceptable regions; and

applying the set of rules associated with the acceptable region detected to correlate with the region identified as indicative of fire to determine whether an alarm should be triggered or suppressed, wherein the set of rules comprises a rule to trigger the alarm when no overlap is detected between the regions indicative of fire and the defined acceptable regions.

19. The method of claim 18 , wherein detecting a correlation includes:

calculating a correlation value associated with the region identified as indicative of fire located outside the defined acceptable region and a region identified as indicative of fire located inside the defined acceptable region.

20. The method of claim 19 , wherein rule associated with the acceptable region is applied to the region identified as indicative of fire is the calculated correlation value exceeds a user-defined threshold.

Assignments (4)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 10, 2025
From: CARRIER CORPORATION; CARRIER GLOBAL CORPORATION; CARRIER FIRE & SECURITY EMEA; CARRIER FIRE & SECURITY, LLC; CARRIER CANADA CORPORATION; CLIMATE, CONTROLS & SECURITY ARGENTINA S.A.; KIDDE IP HOLDINGS , INC.; KIDDE LTD.; KIDDE PRODUCTS LTD.; CARRIER TRANSICOLD AUSTRIA GMBH; CARRIER TRANSICOLD FRANCE SCS
To: KIDDE FIRE PROTECTION, LLC
Reel/Frame 072830/0001 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded May 28, 2025
From: KIDDE FIRE PROTECTION, LLC; WALTER KIDDE PORTABLE EQUIPMENT INC.
To: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Reel/Frame 071436/0526 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 14, 2025
From: CARRIER GLOBAL CORPORATION; CARRIER CORPORATION; CARRIER FIRE & SECURITY EMEA; CARRIER FIRE & SECURITY, LLC; CARRIER CANADA CORPORATION; CLIMATE, CONTROLS & SECURITY ARGENTINA S.A.; KIDDE IP HOLDINGS, INC.; KIDDE LTD.; KIDDE PRODUCTS LTD.; CARRIER TRANSICOLD AUSTRIA GMBH; CARRIER TRANSICOLD FRANCE SCS
To: KIDDE FIRE PROTECTION, LLC
Reel/Frame 070518/0387 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 22, 2010
From: FINN, ALAN MATTHEW; PENG, PEI-YUAN; CABALLERO, RODRIGO E.; XIONG, ZIYOU; WANG, HONGCHENG
To: UTC FIRE & SECURITY CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 025561/0401 →