IP Library Granted Patent US 8,649,898
Granted Patent B2
US 8,649,898 · App. 13/011,159 · Granted Feb 11, 2014

Processing shiny mail pieces

Inventor: William R. Brandt (Arlington, VA)
Assignee: RAF Technology, Inc.
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,649,898
App. No.
13/011,159
Granted
Feb 11, 2014
Kind
B2
Abstract

Methods, apparatus, software and systems are disclosed for improved processing of mailpieces in order to reduce expensive manual steps. Shiny mail, i.e., mailpieces having glossy surfaces that sometimes interfere with printing of barcodes and or ID Tags may lead to rejects. In some embodiments, shiny mailpieces are identified, and at least one new (non-shiny) label is over-labeled in the POSTNET clear zone ( 108 ), the ID Tag zone ( 202 ), or both. In one embodiment, a specially-configured Reject Encoding Machine (REM) ( 1142 ) is employed to label or over-label a POSTNET clear zone ( 1110 ), resolve the destination address ( 1112 ) if possible, and print the barcode ( 1114 ) in a single operation. Thereafter, the mailpiece may be transferred from the REM into a downstream DBCS ( 1144 ), thereby re-introducing the mailpiece into the automated mail stream rather than being relegated to a manual stream.

Claims (39)

1. A non-transitory machine-readable digital memory device comprising:

a series of executable instructions stored in the machine-readable digital memory device, wherein the executable instructions are adapted for operating a reject encoding machine (REM); and wherein the executable instructions include:

first instructions for the REM to identify a mailpiece as being shiny mail;

second instructions for the REM to, in response to identifying the mailpiece as being shiny mail, over-label the mailpiece with at least one non-shiny label;

third instructions for the REM to recognize a destination address of the mailpiece based on a captured digital image;

fourth instructions for the REM to print a barcode corresponding to the destination address onto the non-shiny label; and

fifth instructions for the REM to output the mailpiece for return to downstream processing.

2. The non-transitory machine-readable digital memory device of claim 1 , wherein:

the second instructions for the REM to over-label the mailpiece with at least one non-shiny label comprises instructions for the REM to automatically apply a non-shiny label in a POSTNET clear zone on a front side of the mailpiece; and

the fourth instructions for the REM to print a barcode corresponding to the destination address onto the non-shiny label comprises instructions for controlling the REM to print the barcode onto the non-shiny label applied in the POSTNET clear zone.

3. The non-transitory machine-readable digital memory device of claim 1 , wherein the second instructions for the REM to over-label the mailpiece with at least one non-shiny label comprises instructions for controlling the REM to apply a non-shiny label to an ID Tag clear zone on the back side of the mailpiece.

4. The non-transitory machine-readable digital memory device of claim 1 , wherein the executable instructions further include sixth instructions for the REM to apply a non-shiny label to an ID Tag clear zone on the back side of the mailpiece in response to determining that the third instructions for the REM to recognize a destination address of the mailpiece does not succeed in determining the destination address.

5. A reject encoding machine (REM) including a digital processor configured to execute a series of executable instructions stored in a non-transitory machine-readable digital memory device, wherein the executable instructions include:

instructions for the REM to identify a mailpiece as being shiny mail;

instructions for the REM to, in response to identifying the mailpiece as being shiny mail, over-label the mailpiece with at least one non-shiny label;

instructions for the REM to recognize a destination address of the mailpiece based on a captured digital image;

instructions for the REM to print a barcode corresponding to the destination address onto the non-shiny label; and

instructions for the REM to output the mailpiece for return to downstream processing.

6. The REM of claim 5 , wherein the executable instructions further comprise:

instructions for applying a label in the ID Tag clear zone on the mailpiece so as to over-label any pre-existing label in the ID Tag clear zone;

instructions for transferring the mailpiece to a processing machine operating in an Input Sub-System (ISS) mode of operation; and

instructions for printing a barcode in a POSTNET clear zone on the mailpiece that corresponds to the resolved address.

7. The REM of claim 5 , wherein the executable instructions further comprise instructions for accessing a Remote Encoding Center (REC) or using Remote Computer Recognition (RCR) to resolve the address.

8. The REM of claim 5 , wherein both over-labeling and printing the destination barcode onto the non-shiny label are performed in a single machine.

9. The REM of claim 5 , wherein the executable instructions further comprise instructions for transferring the mailpiece to a reject encoding machine (REM) for both over-labeling the mailpiece and printing the destination barcode onto a new label.

10. The REM of claim 9 , wherein the executable instructions further comprise instructions for transferring the mailpiece from the REM into a downstream delivery bar code sorter, thereby re-introducing the mailpiece into the automated mail stream rather than being relegated to a manual stream.

11. The REM of claim 5 , wherein the destination barcode printed on the label comprises one of an 11-digit delivery point code, a 9-digit zip code, and a 5-digit barcode representing zip code only.

12. The REM of claim 5 , wherein the means for over-labeling the mailpiece comprises means for automatically over-labeling the mailpiece with at least one non-shiny label in response to identifying the mailpiece as being shiny mail.

13. A reject encoding machine (REM) including a digital processor configured to execute a series of executable instructions stored in a non-transitory machine-readable digital memory device, the REM further comprising:

means for identifying a mailpiece as being shiny mail;

means for over-labeling the mailpiece with at least one non-shiny label in response to identifying the mailpiece as being shiny mail;

means for recognizing a destination address of the mailpiece based on a captured digital image;

means for printing a barcode corresponding to the recognized destination address onto the non-shiny label; and

means to output the mailpiece for return to downstream processing.

14. The REM of claim 13 wherein:

the means for over-labeling the mailpiece comprises means for automatically applying a non-shiny label in a POSTNET clear zone on a front side of the mailpiece; and

the means for printing a barcode comprises means for printing the barcode onto the non-shiny label applied in the POSTNET clear zone.

15. The REM of claim 13 wherein the means for over-labeling the mailpiece comprises means for applying a non-shiny label to an ID Tag clear zone on the back side of the mailpiece.

16. The REM of claim 13 further comprising means for applying a non-shiny label to an ID Tag clear zone on the back side of the mailpiece in response to determining that the means for recognizing does not succeed in recognizing the destination address.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 20, 2023
From: MATTHEWS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
To: RAF SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY INC.
Reel/Frame 065922/0275 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 28, 2017
From: RAF TECHNOLOGY, INC.
To: MATTHEWS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 043976/0297 →
Continuity (4)
Division 12543990 · Aug 19, 2009
Continuation 11932970 · Oct 31, 2007
Provisional Application 60856425 · Nov 1, 2006
Related Publication 20110114543A1 · May 19, 2011