IP Library Granted Patent US 8,233,941
Granted Patent B2
US 8,233,941 · App. 13/026,442 · Granted Jul 31, 2012

Multi-transceiver system with MIMO and beam-forming capability

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,233,941
App. No.
13/026,442
Granted
Jul 31, 2012
Kind
B2
Abstract

A system and method for communicating with a second communication system utilizing a plurality of antennas. Various aspects of the present invention may comprise determining whether communicating with the second communication system utilizing a plurality of antennas in a first configuration, which comprises a beam-forming configuration, is preferable to utilizing a plurality of antennas in a second configuration, which comprises a MIMO or MISO configuration. If it is determined that the first configuration is preferable to the second configuration, the communication system may be configured to communicate with the second communication system by utilizing at least a portion of the plurality of antennas in the first configuration. If it is determined that the second configuration is preferable to the first configuration, then the communication system may be configured to communicate with the second communication system by utilizing at least a portion of the plurality of antennas in the second configuration.

Claims (39)

1. In a communication system comprising a plurality of antennas, a method of communicating with at least a second communication system, the method comprising:

determining whether communicating with the second communication system utilizing a plurality of antennas of the communication system in a beam-forming configuration is preferable to utilizing a plurality of antennas of the communication system in a MIMO or MISO configuration,

wherein said determining is based, at least in part, on one or both of:

energy or power availability; and

energy or power consumption;

if it is determined that the beam-forming configuration is preferable to the MIMO or MISO configuration, then configuring the communication system to communicate with the second communication system by utilizing a plurality of antennas of the communication system in the beam-forming configuration to form a directional signal; and

if it is determined that the MIMO or MISO configuration is preferable to the beam-forming configuration, then configuring the communication system to communicate with the second communication system by utilizing a plurality of antennas of the communication system in the MIMO or MISO configuration to communicate using MIMO or MISO signals.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein said determining comprises determining whether the beam-forming configuration is preferable to the MIMO or MISO configuration based, at least in part, on energy or power available for communication.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein said determining comprises determining whether the beam-forming configuration is preferable to the MIMO or MISO configuration based, at least in part, on energy or power anticipated to be available.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein said determining comprises determining whether the beam-forming configuration is preferable to the MIMO or MISO configuration based, at least in part, on secure communication needs of the communication system and/or the second communication system.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein said determining comprises determining whether the beam-forming configuration is preferable to the MIMO or MISO configuration based, at least in part, on dimensional characteristics of a communication cell that is associated with the communication system and/or the second communication system.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein said determining comprises determining whether the beam-forming configuration is preferable to the MIMO or MISO configuration based, at least in part, on a determined geographical position of the second communication system.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein said determining comprises determining whether the beam-forming configuration is preferable to the MIMO or MISO configuration based, at least in part, on a determined multi-path characteristic of a communication environment between the communication system and the second communication system.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein said determining comprises determining whether the beam-forming configuration is preferable to the MIMO or MISO configuration based, at least in part, on an input received from a user of the communication system and/or the second communication system.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein said determining comprises determining whether the beam-forming configuration is preferable to the MIMO or MISO configuration based, at least in part, on a desired data rate.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein said determining comprises determining whether the beam-forming configuration is preferable to the MIMO or MISO configuration based, at least in part, on a need for a hand-off.

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein said configuring the communication system to communicate with the second communication system by utilizing a plurality of antennas of the communication system in the beam-forming configuration to form a directional signal comprises determining directional characteristics of a desired communication beam based, at least in part, on a determined geographical position of the second communication system.

12. The method of claim 1 , wherein the communication system is a portable communication system.

13. The method of claim 1 , wherein the communication system is a communication network access point.

14. A communication system having a plurality of antennas and capable of communicating with a second communication system, the communication system comprising:

at least one module that operates to, at least:

determine whether communicating with the second communication system utilizing a plurality of the plurality of antennas of the communication system in a beam-forming configuration is preferable to utilizing a plurality of the plurality of antennas of the communication system in a MIMO or MISO configuration,

wherein said determination is based, at least in part, on one or both of:

energy or power availability; and

energy or power consumption;

if it is determined that the beam-forming configuration is preferable to the MIMO or MISO configuration, then configure the communication system to communicate with the second communication system by utilizing a plurality of the plurality of antennas of the communication system in the beam-forming configuration to form a directional signal; and

if it is determined that the MIMO or MISO configuration is preferable to the beam-forming configuration, then configure the communication system to communicate with the second communication system by utilizing a plurality of the plurality of antennas of the communication system in the MIMO or MISO configuration to communicate using MIMO or MISO signals.

15. The communication system of claim 14 , wherein said at least one module is operable to determine whether the beam-forming configuration is preferable to the MIMO or MISO configuration based, at least in part, on energy or power available for communication.

16. The communication system of claim 14 , wherein said at least one module is operable to determine whether the beam-forming configuration is preferable to the MIMO or MISO configuration based, at least in part, on energy or power anticipated to be available.

17. The communication system of claim 14 , wherein said at least one module is operable to determine whether the beam-forming configuration is preferable to the MIMO or MISO configuration based, at least in part, on secure communication needs of the communication system and/or the second communication system.

18. The communication system of claim 14 , wherein said at least one module is operable to determine whether the beam-forming configuration is preferable to the MIMO or MISO configuration based, at least in part, on dimensional characteristics of a communication cell that is associated with the communication system and/or the second communication system.

19. The communication system of claim 14 , wherein said at least one module is operable to determine whether the beam-forming configuration is preferable to the MIMO or MISO configuration based, at least in part, on a determined geographical position of the second communication system.

20. The communication system of claim 14 , wherein said at least one module is operable to determine whether the beam-forming configuration is preferable to the MIMO or MISO configuration based, at least in part, on a determined multi-path characteristic of a communication environment between the communication system and the second communication system.

21. The communication system of claim 14 , wherein said at least one module is operable to determine whether the beam-forming configuration is preferable to the MIMO or MISO configuration based, at least in part, on an input received from a user of the communication system and/or the second communication system.

22. The communication system of claim 14 , wherein said at least one module is operable to determine whether the beam-forming configuration is preferable to the MIMO or MISO configuration based, at least in part, on a desired data rate.

23. The communication system of claim 14 , wherein said at least one module is operable to determine whether the beam-forming configuration is preferable to the MIMO or MISO configuration based, at least in part, on a need for a hand-off.

24. The communication system of claim 14 , wherein said at least one module is operable to configure the communication system to communicate with the second communication system by utilizing a plurality of antennas of the communication system in the beam-forming configuration to form a directional signal by, at least in part, operating to determine directional characteristics of a desired communication beam based, at least in part, on a determined geographical position of the second communication system.

25. The communication system of claim 14 , where the communication system is a portable communication system.

26. The communication system of claim 14 , where the communication system is a communication network access point.

Assignments (6)
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF MERGER TO 09/05/2018 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 047230 FRAME: 0133. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE MERGER. Recorded Oct 29, 2018
From: AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES GENERAL IP (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.
To: AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL SALES PTE. LIMITED
Reel/Frame 047630/0456 →
MERGER Recorded Oct 4, 2018
From: AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES GENERAL IP (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.
To: AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL SALES PTE. LIMITED
Reel/Frame 047230/0133 →
TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS Recorded Feb 3, 2017
From: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: BROADCOM CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 041712/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 1, 2017
From: BROADCOM CORPORATION
To: AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES GENERAL IP (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.
Reel/Frame 041706/0001 →
PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Feb 11, 2016
From: BROADCOM CORPORATION
To: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 037806/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 4, 2013
From: SESHADRI, NAMBIRAJAN; KARAOGUZ, JEYHAN; BENNETT, JAMES D.
To: BROADCOM CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 030153/0664 →