IP Library Granted Patent US 9,198,750
Granted Patent B2
US 9,198,750 · App. 13/046,624 · Granted Dec 1, 2015

Tendon repair implant and method of arthroscopic implantation

Inventors: Craig Van Kampen (Oakdale, MN); Nathaniel Zenz-Olson (Blaine, MN); Thomas A. Westling (Orono, MN); Charles L. Euteneuer (St. Michael, MN)
Assignee: Rotation Medical, Inc.
A61F2/08A61F2/0805A61F2002/0068A61F2002/0894A61F2210/0004A61F2210/0057A61L27/24A61L27/3662A61L27/56A61L27/58A61L2430/10
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,198,750
App. No.
13/046,624
Granted
Dec 1, 2015
Kind
B2
Abstract

A tendon repair implant for treatment of a partial thickness tear in the supraspinatus tendon of the shoulder is provided. The implant may incorporate features of rapid deployment and fixation by arthroscopic means that compliment current procedures; tensile properties that result in desired sharing of anatomical load between the implant and native tendon during rehabilitation; selected porosity and longitudinal pathways for tissue in-growth; sufficient cyclic straining of the implant in the longitudinal direction to promote remodeling of new tissue to tendon-like tissue; and, may include a bioresorbable construction to provide transfer of additional load to new tendon-like tissue and native tendon over time.

Claims (13)

1. A method of repairing a partial thickness tear in a supraspinatus tendon without suturing the supraspinatus tendon together, the method comprising:

using a sheet-like structure, the sheet-like structure having a longitudinal dimension and lateral dimension, the sheet-like structure having a tensile modulus of 1 MPa to 100 MPa in the range of 1% to 3% strain in the longitudinal dimension, where 0% strain is defined with a 1 N preload applied to the sheet-like structure, a compressive modulus of at least 0.1 MPa, and having a porosity of 50% to 80% defining longitudinally elongated pathways along the longitudinal dimension, said porosity being sized and adapted to allow tissue in-growth within said pathways, said pathways having cross-section widths of 150-200 microns;

arthroscopically accessing a bursal side surface of the supraspinatus tendon with the sheet-like structure in a first configuration;

deploying the sheet-like structure by transforming the sheet-like structure to a second configuration wherein a surface of the sheet-like structure extends over the partial thickness tear;

contacting and conforming the sheet-like structure to the bursal side surface of the supraspinatus tendon with the longitudinal dimension extending in a lengthwise direction of the supraspinatus tendon; and,

affixing the sheet-like structure to the bursal side surface of the supraspinatus tendon such that a first portion of the sheet-like structure is affixed to the partially torn tendon on a muscle side of the partial tear without using sutures and a second portion of the sheet-like structure is affixed to a tuberosity side of the of the partial tear without using sutures;

wherein upon affixing the sheet-like structure to the bursal side surface of the supraspinatus tendon, an anatomical load on the supraspinatus tendon and sheet-like structure combination is distributed with 5% to 33% of the anatomical load carried by the sheet-like structure.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the torn portion of the partial thickness tear comprises less than 50% of a cross-sectional area of the tendon adjacent to the site of the partial thickness tear.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the sheet-like structure has a compressive modulus of at least 0.2 MPa.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the sheet-like structure has a coating that encourages tissue in-growth.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein tissue which has grown within the sheet-like structure experiences tendon-like strain when the sheet-like structure is subjected to longitudinally elongating loads following implantation.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the sheet-like structure is at least one of bioresorbable, biodegradable, or otherwise absorbable after implantation.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein distribution of the anatomical load on the supraspinatus tendon and sheet-like structure combination is such that the sheet-like structure sustains less of the anatomical load one month after being affixed to the partially torn tendon than the sheet-like structure did upon initially affixing the sheet-like structure to the partially torn tendon.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 16, 2011
From: VAN KAMPEN, CRAIG; ZENZ-OLSON, NATHANIEL; WESTLING, THOMAS A.; EUTENEUER, CHARLES L.
To: ROTATION MEDICAL, INC.
Reel/Frame 027239/0778 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 61313113 · Mar 11, 2010
Related Publication 20110224702A1 · Sep 15, 2011