Herbicidal combination comprising dimethoxytriazinyl-substituted difluoromethanesulfonylanilides
View Patent ↗The present invention relates to a herbicide combination comprising components (A) and (B) where (A) denotes one or more compounds or salts thereof from the group described by the general formula (I): in which R 1 is halogen, preferably fluorine or chlorine, R 2 is hydrogen and R 3 is hydroxyl or R 2 and R 3 together with the carbon atom to which they are attached are a carbonyl group C═O and R 4 is hydrogen or methyl; and (B) denotes one or more herbicides from the group of the pyrimidines consisting of: (B1-1) ancymidol, (B1-2) flurprimidol, (B1-3) pyrimisulfan, (B2-1) bispyribac-sodium, (B2-2) pyribenzoxim, (B2-3) pyriminobac-methyl, (B2-4) pyribambenz-isopropyl, (B2-5) pyribambenz-propyl, (B3-1) pyriftalid, (B3-2) pyrithiobac-sodium, (B4-1) benzfendizone, (B4-2) bromacil, (B4-3) butafenacil, (B4-4) lenacil, (B4-5) terbacil, (B4-6) SYN-523, (B4-7) saflufenacil.
1. A herbicide combination comprising
(A) a compound of formula (A1) or salt thereof
and
(B) saflufenacil.
2. The herbicide combination as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the weight ratio (A):
(B) of the components (A) and (B) is in the range of from 1:5000 to 500:1.
3. The herbicide combination as claimed in claim 1 , comprising one or more further components selected from the group of agrochemically active compounds formulation auxiliaries and additives customary in crop protection.
4. The herbicide combination as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the weight ratio (A):
(B) of the components (A) and (B) is in the range of from 1:1000 to 250:1.
5. The herbicide combination as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the weight ratio (A):
(B) of the components (A) and (B) is in the range of from 1:160 to 100:1.
6. The herbicide combination as claimed in claim 1 , further comprising a herbicide that is herbicidally active based on inhibition of acetolactate synthase, acetyl coenzyme A carboxylase, cellulose synthase, enolpyruvylshikimate 3-phosphate synthase, glutamine synthetase, p-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase, phytoene desaturase, or protoporphyrinogen oxidase.
7. The herbicide combination as claimed in claim 1 , further comprising a safener, wherein the weight ratio of the components (A) and (B): safener is in the range of from 3000:1 to 1:500.
8. A method for controlling a weed, the method comprising separately or jointly applying to one or more of a plant, a seed, or an area under cultivation
(A) a compound of formula (A1) or salt thereof
and
(B) saflufenacil.
9. The method as claimed in claim 8 wherein said weed is controlled in a crop plant selected from wheat, durum wheat, common wheat, corn, soybeans, sugar beet, sugar cane, cotton, rice, beans, flax, barley, oats, rye, triticale, oilseed rape, potatoes, millet, sorghum, pasture grass, greens/lawns; in a fruit plantation crop; or on a non-crop area.
10. The method as claimed in claim 8 wherein the components (A) and (B) are applied jointly.
11. The method as claimed in claim 8 wherein the components (A) and (B) are applied separately.
12. The method as claimed in claim 8 wherein said weed is controlled in rice.
13. The method as claimed in claim 8 wherein said weed comprises a plant selected from one or more of the group consisting of broad-leaved weeds, weed grasses, and Cyperaceae that are resistant to herbicidally active compounds selected from the group consisting of glyphosate, glufosinate, atrazine, imidazolinone herbicides, sulfonylureas, (hetero)aryloxyaryloxyalkylcarboxylic acids, -phenoxyalkylcarboxylic acids, cyclohexanedione oximes, and auxin inhibitors.
14. The method as claimed in claim 8 , wherein the weight ratio (A) : (B) of the components (A) and (B) is in the range of from 1:1000 to 250:1.
15. The method as claimed in claim 8 , wherein the weight ratio (A) : (B) of the components (A) and (B) is in the range of from 1:160 to 100:1.
16. The method as claimed in claim 8 , wherein component (A) is applied at an application rate 0.1-1000 g of active substance per hectare.
17. The method as claimed in claim 8 , wherein component (A) is applied at an application rate 0.1-500 g of active substance per hectare.
18. The method as claimed in claim 8 , wherein component (B) is applied at an application rate 1-1000 g of active substance per hectare.
19. The method as claimed in claim 8 , wherein component (B) is applied at an application rate 2-800 g of active substance per hectare.