IP Library Granted Patent US 9,104,477
Granted Patent B2
US 9,104,477 · App. 13/101,626 · Granted Aug 11, 2015

Scheduling in MapReduce-like systems for fast completion time

Inventors: Muralidharan S. Kodialam (Marlboro, NJ); Tirunell V. Lakshman (Morganville, NJ); Sarit Mukherjee (Morganville, NJ); Hyunseok Chang (Holmdel, NJ); Myung Jin Lee (West Lafayette, IN)
Assignee: Alcatel Lucent
G06F9/4881
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,104,477
App. No.
13/101,626
Granted
Aug 11, 2015
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method and system for scheduling tasks is provided. A plurality of lower bound completion times is determined, using one or more computer processors and memory, for each of a plurality of jobs, each of the plurality of jobs including a respective subset plurality of tasks. A task schedule is determined for each of the plurality of processors based on the lower bound completion times.

Claims (75)

1. A computer-implemented method for scheduling a plurality of tasks, wherein tasks are assigned respectively to one of a plurality of processors, the method comprising:

in response to respective arrivals of new jobs, determining, using one or more computer processors and memory, weighted lower bound completion times for a plurality of jobs respectively based on an importance of its respective job, wherein a job comprises a plurality of tasks; and

determining, using one or more computer processors and memory, a task schedule for the plurality of processors respectively based on a ranked order of the plurality of jobs ranked according to the weighted lower bound completion times to reduce a weighted sum of job completion times.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising scheduling, at the plurality of processors respectively, the tasks based on the task schedule.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the weighted lower bound completion times comprises:

solving a linear program to determine a lower bound completion time of a respective job in the plurality of jobs, wherein the linear program is determined by the equation

Z

LP

=

min

j

J

w

j

C

j

,

 wherein Z LP is a minimum weighted completion time, j is the respective job in the plurality of jobs J, w j represents a job weight, and C j represents a calculated job completion time.

4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining the respective weighted lower bound completion times for jobs in the plurality of jobs at a predetermined time interval in response to a respective new job arrival during the predetermined time interval.

5. An apparatus for scheduling a plurality of tasks, wherein tasks are assigned respectively to one of a plurality of processors, the apparatus comprising one or more computer processors and memory, the one or more computer processors and memory configured to:

in response to respective arrivals of new jobs, determine weighted lower bound completion times for a plurality of jobs respectively based on an importance of its respective job, wherein a job comprises a plurality of tasks; and

determine a task schedule for the plurality of processors respectively based on a ranked order of the plurality of jobs ranked according to the weighted lower bound completion times to reduce a weighted sum of job completion times.

6. The apparatus of claim 5 , wherein the one or more computer processors and memory are further configured to:

schedule, at the plurality of processors respectively, the tasks based on the task schedule.

7. The apparatus of claim 5 , wherein the one or more computer processors and memory are further configured to:

solve a linear program to determine a lower bound completion time of a respective job in the plurality of jobs, wherein the linear program is determined by the equation

Z

LP

=

min

j

J

w

j

C

j

,

 wherein Z LP is a minimum weighted completion time, j is the respective job in the plurality of jobs J, w j represents a job weight, and C j represents a calculated job completion time.

8. The apparatus of claim 5 , wherein the one or more computer processors and memory are further configured to:

determine the respective weighted lower bound completion time for jobs in the plurality of jobs at a predetermined time interval in response to a respective new job arrival during the predetermined time interval.

9. An article of manufacture including a tangible non-transitory computer-readable medium having instructions stored thereon, that in response to execution by a computing device cause the computing device to perform operations comprising:

in response to respective arrivals of new jobs, determining weighted lower bound completion times for a plurality of jobs respectively based on an importance of its respective job, wherein a job comprises a plurality of tasks; and

determining a task schedule for the plurality of processors respectively based on a ranked order of the plurality of jobs ranked according to the weighted lower bound completion times to reduce a weighted sum of job completion times.

10. The article of manufacture of claim 9 , wherein the operations further comprise scheduling, at the plurality of processors respectively, the tasks based on the task schedule.

11. The article of manufacture of claim 9 , wherein the operation of determining the weighted lower bound completion times comprises:

solving a linear program to determine a lower bound completion time of a respective job in the plurality of jobs, wherein the linear program is determined by the equation

Z

LP

=

min

j

J

w

j

C

j

,

 wherein Z LP is a minimum weighted completion time, j is the respective job in the plurality of jobs J, w j , represents a job weight, and C j represents a calculated job completion time.

12. The article of manufacture of claim 9 , wherein the operation of determining the respective weighted lower bound completion times for jobs in the plurality of jobs is performed at a predetermined time interval in response to a respective new job arrival during the predetermined time interval.

Assignments (4)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Sep 30, 2014
From: CREDIT SUISSE AG
To: ALCATEL LUCENT
Reel/Frame 033868/0555 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jan 30, 2013
From: ALCATEL LUCENT
To: CREDIT SUISSE AG
Reel/Frame 029821/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 29, 2012
From: ALCATEL-LUCENT USA INC.
To: ALCATEL LUCENT
Reel/Frame 028465/0881 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 5, 2011
From: KODIALAM, MURALIDHARAN S.; LAKSHMAN, T.V.; MUKHERJEE, SARIT; CHANG, HYUNSEOK; LEE, MYUNG JIN
To: ALCATEL-LUCENT USA INC.
Reel/Frame 026231/0957 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20120284727A1 · Nov 8, 2012