IP Library Granted Patent US 8,381,293
Granted Patent B2
US 8,381,293 · App. 13/112,810 · Granted Feb 19, 2013

Identity theft countermeasures

Inventors: Aaron T. Emigh (Incline Village, NV); James A. Roskind (Redwood City, CA)
Assignee: James A. Roskind
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,381,293
App. No.
13/112,810
Granted
Feb 19, 2013
Kind
B2
Abstract

In some embodiments, techniques for computer security comprise preventing and/or mitigating identity theft such as phishing.

Claims (32)

1. A method for computer security, the method being performed by one or more processors and comprising:

accessing a plurality of records to determine documents that have been accessed on a computer system of a user;

determining, from accessing the plurality of records, that the computer system of the user has been compromised as a result of confidential information being communicated from the user's computer system to an unauthorized user;

determining what data has been compromised by analyzing one or more records from the plurality of records, wherein the data is associated with an account of the user, the account including at least one of a name of the account, account numbers, a password, or credit card data;

determining a responsible institution that issued the account to the user based on the account associated with the data that has been compromised; and

in response to determining the responsible institution, transmitting a report of the data that has been compromised to the responsible institution.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining that the computer system of the user has been compromised includes determining that one or more records of the plurality of records is suspicious based on one or more predetermined conditions.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein determining that the computer system of the user has been compromised includes prompting the user for verification when one or more records of the plurality of records are determined to be suspicious.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the responsible institution includes (i) prompting the user to identify the responsible institution by providing a list of potential responsible institutions, and (ii) receiving a selection input provided by the user.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein transmitting the report of the data that has been compromised to the responsible institution includes transmitting the report to a system that monitors fraud reports for the responsible institution over a network.

6. A system for providing computer security comprising:

one or more memory resources; and

one or more processors coupled to the one or more memory resources, the one or more processors configured to:

access a plurality of records to determine documents that have been accessed on a computer system of a user;

determine, from accessing the plurality of records, that the computer system of the user has been compromised as a result of confidential information being communicated from the user's computer system to an unauthorized user;

determine what data has been compromised by analyzing one or more records from the plurality of records, wherein the data is associated with an account of the user, the account including at least one of a name of the account, account numbers, a password, or credit card data;

determine a responsible institution that issued the account to the user based on the account associated with the data that has been compromised; and

in response to determining the responsible institution, transmit a report of the data that has been compromised to the responsible institution.

7. The system of claim 6 , wherein the one or more processors determine that the computer system of the user has been compromised by determining that one or more records of the plurality of records is suspicious based on one or more predetermined conditions.

8. The system of claim 7 , wherein the one or more processors determine that the computer system of the user has been compromised by prompting the user for verification when one or more records of the plurality of records are determined to be suspicious.

9. The system of claim 6 , wherein the one or more processors determine the responsible institution by (i) prompting the user to identify the responsible institution by providing a list of potential responsible institutions, and (ii) receiving a selection input provided by the user.

10. The system of claim 6 , wherein the one or more processors transmit the report of the data that has been compromised to the responsible institution by transmitting the report to a system that monitors fraud reports for the responsible institution over a network.

11. A non-transitory computer readable medium storing instructions that, when executed by one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to perform steps comprising:

accessing a plurality of records to determine documents that have been accessed on a computer system of a user;

determining, from accessing the plurality of records, that the computer system of the user has been compromised as a result of confidential information being communicated from the user's computer system to an unauthorized user;

determining what data has been compromised by analyzing one or more records from the plurality of records, wherein the data is associated with an account of the user, the account including at least one of a name of the account, account numbers, a password, or credit card data;

determining a responsible institution that issued the account to the user based on the account associated with the data that has been compromised; and

in response to determining the responsible institution, transmitting a report of the data that has been compromised to the responsible institution.

12. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 11 , wherein the instructions cause the one or more processors to determine that the computer system of the user has been compromised by determining that one or more records of the plurality of records is suspicious based on one or more predetermined conditions.

13. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 12 , wherein the instructions cause the one or more processors to determine that the computer system of the user has been compromised by prompting the user for verification when one or more records of the plurality of records are determined to be suspicious.

14. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 11 , wherein the instructions cause the one or more processors to determine the responsible institution by (i) prompting the user to identify the responsible institution by providing a list of potential responsible institutions, and (ii) receiving a selection input provided by the user.

15. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 11 , wherein the instructions cause the one or more processors to transmit the report of the data that has been compromised to the responsible institution by transmitting the report to a system that monitors fraud reports for the responsible institution over a network.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 25, 2018
From: EMIGH, AARON T.
To: ROSKIND, JAMES A., DR.
Reel/Frame 044729/0637 →
Continuity (5)
Continuation 11116781 · Apr 27, 2005
Provisional Application 60566671 · Apr 29, 2004
Provisional Application 60568744 · May 6, 2004
Provisional Application 60612132 · Sep 22, 2004
Related Publication 20110225652A1 · Sep 15, 2011