IP Library Granted Patent US 8,676,531
Granted Patent B2
US 8,676,531 · App. 13/116,441 · Granted Mar 18, 2014

Method and device for living space added value efficacy index evaluation

Inventors: Haruka Ueda (Tokyo, JP); Ryouta Dazai (Tokyo, JP); Masato Tanaka (Tokyo, JP)
Assignee: Azbil Corporation
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,676,531
App. No.
13/116,441
Granted
Mar 18, 2014
Kind
B2
Abstract

A measured value for a PMV within a living space is sent to a comfort efficacy evaluating device. Occupancy information (the current number of occupants N) in the living space is sent to the comfort efficacy evaluating device. The comfort efficacy evaluating device calculates a comfort index P as P=1.0−|PMV|/3, and this comfort index P is weighted by the number of occupants N at the time that the comfort index P was taken. In this case, if the number of occupants is relatively high, the weighting is high, and if the number of occupants is relatively low, then the weighting is low. Additionally, the weighted comfort index P is integrated over an evaluation interval, and thus integrated value, or a weighted average based on this integrated value, is used as a comfort efficacy index TP. An evaluation of the efficacy of energy conservation can be performed in the same way, taking into account the current occupancy of the living space.

Claims (31)

1. A living space added value efficacy index evaluating method comprising:

a control status index acquiring step acquiring, by a control status index device, control status indices, each control status index indicating a present control status in a living space;

an occupancy status detecting step detecting, by a an occupancy status detector, current occupancy statuses in the living space, which correspond to the control status indices, respectively; and

an added value efficacy index calculating step calculating, by an added value efficacy index calculator, an added value efficacy index that indicates efficacy of a specific added value by weighting the control status indices in accordance with the corresponding current occupancy statuses, and integrating the weighted control status indices within a specific interval established as an evaluation interval.

2. The living space added value efficacy index evaluating method as set forth in claim 1 , wherein:

the control status index is defined as a comfort index that indicates the current control status of comfort within the living space.

3. The living space added value efficacy index evaluating method as set forth in claim 2 , wherein:

The comfort index has a value that is larger when the comfort is higher and smaller when the comfort is lower: and

the added value efficacy index calculating step integrates the weighted control status indices over the evaluation interval, wherein the weighting on the comfort index is large when the number of occupants in the living space is relatively high, and the weighting on the comfort index is small when the number of occupants is relatively small.

4. The living space added value efficacy index evaluating method as set forth in claim 3 , wherein:

the added value efficacy index calculating step integrates the weighted control status indices over the evaluation interval, with the weighting in the comfort index established as W=N/Nmax, wherein a maximum expected number of occupants in the living space is defined as Nmax and the current number of occupants in the living space is defined as N.

5. The living space added value efficacy index evaluating method as set forth in claim 1 , wherein:

the control status index is defined as an energy conservation index that indicates the current control status of energy conservation within the living space.

6. The living space added value efficacy index evaluating method as set forth in claim 5 , wherein

the energy conservation index has a value that is larger when the degree of potential improvement in energy conservation is larger and smaller when the degree of potential improvement in energy conservation is smaller: and

the added value efficacy index calculating step integrates the weighted control status indices over the evaluation interval, wherein the weighting on the energy conservation index is small when the number of occupants in the living space is relatively high, and the weighting on the energy conservation index is large when the number of occupants is relatively small.

7. The living space added value efficacy index evaluating method as set forth in claim 6 , wherein:

the control status index weighting step integrates the weighted control status indices over the evaluation interval, with the weighting in the comfort index established as

V= 1.0−α·( N/N max)

wherein a maximum expected number of occupants in the living space is defined as Nmax, the current number of occupants in the living space is defined as N, and a factor is defined as α (0<α<1.0).

8. The added value efficacy evaluating method as set forth in claim 1 , wherein the occupancy status detecting step detects the current occupancy status in the living space based on information from an existing system equipped for the living space.

9. The added value efficacy evaluating method as set forth in claim 1 , wherein:

the control status index acquiring step acquires the control status index as a reported value from a resident.

10. A living space added value efficacy index evaluating device comprising:

a control status index device acquiring control status indices, each control status index indicating a present control status in a living space;

an occupancy status detector detecting current occupancy statuses in the living space, which correspond to the control status indices, respectively; and

an added value efficacy index calculator calculating an added value efficacy index that indicates efficacy of a specific added value by weighting the control status indices in accordance with the corresponding current occupancy statuses, and integrating the weighted control status indices within a specific interval established as an evaluation interval.

11. The living space added value efficacy index evaluating device as set forth in claim 10 , wherein:

the control status index is defined as a comfort index that indicates the current control status of comfort within the living space.

12. The living space added value efficacy index evaluating device as set forth in claim 10 , wherein:

the control status index is defined as an energy conservation index that indicates the current control status of energy conservation within the living space.

Assignments (2)
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded May 10, 2012
From: YAMATAKE CORPORATION
To: AZBIL CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 028187/0739 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 26, 2011
From: UEDA, HARUKA; DAZAI, RYOUTA; TANAKA, MASATO
To: YAMATAKE CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 026345/0755 →
Priority Claims (1)
JP 2010-121302 · May 27, 2010 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20110295544A1 · Dec 1, 2011