IP Library Granted Patent US 8,560,272
Granted Patent B2
US 8,560,272 · App. 13/120,663 · Granted Oct 15, 2013

Method and system for monitoring a turbojet engine

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,560,272
App. No.
13/120,663
Granted
Oct 15, 2013
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method and a system for monitoring a turbojet engine. The method acquires a signal representative of a vibratory level of an operating rotor of the turbojet engine, acquires a rotation speed of the rotor during operation, compares the amplitude of the signal with at least one predetermined threshold based on the rotor rotation speed and, in event an amplitude peak exceeds the threshold, analyzes the signal over a time slot defined around the amplitude peak to determine if the phenomenon at the origin of the amplitude peak is a mechanical shock undergone by the rotor of the turbojet engine or an electronic interference of the signal.

Claims (49)

1. A method of monitoring a turbojet, the method comprising:

acquiring a signal representative of a vibratory level of a rotor during operation of the turbojet from a vibration sensor which is connected to an engine monitoring unit;

acquiring a speed of rotation of the rotor in operation from a tachometer probe mounted on the rotor and connected to the engine monitoring unit;

comparing, using the engine monitoring unit, an amplitude of the vibratory level signal acquired from the vibration sensor with at least one vibratory threshold that is predetermined as a function of the speed of rotation of the rotor; and

in event of the threshold being crossed by an amplitude peak, analyzing, using the engine monitoring unit, the vibratory level signal acquired from the vibration sensor over a defined time window on either side of the amplitude peak to determine whether a phenomenon giving rise to the amplitude peak is a mechanical impact against the turbojet rotor or an electronic disturbance of the vibratory level signal acquired from the vibration sensor by analyzing symmetry of the vibratory level signal or by determining whether the vibratory level signal presents damping following the amplitude peak,

wherein the phenomenon is the mechanical impact if at least one of the amplitude peak being substantially symmetrical or the vibratory level signal presenting damping following the amplitude peak is satisfied, and

wherein the phenomenon is the electronic disturbance if at least one of the amplitude peak being not symmetrical or the vibratory level signal does not present damping following the amplitude peak is satisfied.

2. A method according to claim 1 , wherein the vibratory level signal presenting damping following the amplitude peak is determined by modeling a decrease in the vibratory level signal after the amplitude peak.

3. A method according to claim 2 , wherein the analyzing the signal over the time window comprises calculating a difference between a curve plotting averages of amplitudes of a spectrogram of the signal at each instant over the time window, with an exponential model of that the curve plotting averages of amplitudes.

4. A method according to claim 1 , wherein the predetermined vibration threshold comprises high and low values for the signal over different ranges of rotor rotation speed.

5. A method according to claim 1 , further comprising, after determining that there has been a mechanical impact against the rotor of the turbojet, determining whether an unbalance has appeared in the rotor following the mechanical impact.

6. A method according to claim 5 , wherein the determining that an unbalance has appeared in the rotor comprises:

making a spectrogram of the signal over a time window;

calculating an average of amplitudes of the spectrogram at each instant;

calculating a difference in levels of the average before and after the amplitude peak; and

comparing the difference in level with a predetermined level threshold.

7. A method according to claim 1 , wherein the acquiring the signal and the acquiring the speed of rotation of the rotor are performed continuously during an operating cycle of the turbojet.

8. A method according to claim 1 , wherein the acquiring the signal, the acquiring the speed of rotation of the rotor, and the comparing the amplitude of the signal are performed in real time, while the analyzing the signal is performed in deferred time.

9. A method according to claim 1 , further comprising issuing a maintenance message if it is determined that the phenomenon giving rise to the vibratory event is a mechanical impact against the rotor of the turbojet.

10. A method according to claim 1 , wherein the amplitude peak is determined to be substantially symmetrical if the condition

S

=

Min

(

M

,

m

)

Max

(

M

,

m

)

c

is satisfied, where M is a positive maximum value taken by the amplitude peak, m is a minimum negative value taken by the amplitude peak, and c is a predetermined parameter.

Assignments (3)
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE COVER SHEET TO REMOVE APPLICATION NOS. 10250419, 10786507, 10786409, 12416418, 12531115, 12996294, 12094637 12416422 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 046479 FRAME 0807. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE CHANGE OF NAME. Recorded Aug 24, 2018
From: SNECMA
To: SAFRAN AIRCRAFT ENGINES
Reel/Frame 046939/0336 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded May 23, 2018
From: SNECMA
To: SAFRAN AIRCRAFT ENGINES
Reel/Frame 046479/0807 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 28, 2011
From: GEREZ, VALERIO; GRIFFATON, JULIEN; GUILLEMAND, GREGORY
To: SNECMA
Reel/Frame 026030/0762 →