IP Library Granted Patent US 8,594,000
Granted Patent B2
US 8,594,000 · App. 13/144,784 · Granted Nov 26, 2013

Apparatus and method for controlling self-interference in a cellular communications system

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,594,000
App. No.
13/144,784
Granted
Nov 26, 2013
Kind
B2
Abstract

The invention relates to a radio base station ( 102 ) and method in a radio base station of a cellular communications system ( 100 ) for controlling self-interference. The radio base station ( 102 ) supports communication with a user equipment ( 101 ) using multiple uplink and multiple downlink carriers ( 104 a, 104 b, 105 a, 105 b ). The method comprises detecting a degraded downlink performance on a downlink carrier ( 105 a ) due to self-interference by determining that a set of predefined conditions applies. The method further comprises executing, in response to detection of the degraded downlink performance, an action to reduce self-interference between the uplink and downlink carriers ( 104 a, 104 b, 105 a, 105 b ). The action is one of: uplink scheduling to reduce self-interference, deactivation of a secondary uplink carrier ( 14 a, 104 b ), deactivation of a secondary downlink carrier ( 105 a, 105 b ), and initiation of carrier reconfiguration to reduce self-interference. Accordingly, benefits of using multi-carrier operation may be balanced against a possible associated drawback of degraded downlink performance due to self-interference.

Claims (72)

1. A method in a radio base station of a cellular communications system for controlling self-interference, wherein the radio base station communicates with a user equipment using multiple uplink and multiple downlink carriers, the method comprising:

detecting a degraded downlink performance on at least one of said multiple downlink carriers due to self-interference by determining that a set of predefined conditions applies, wherein said set of predefined conditions includes the following conditions:

a duplex distance below a predetermined first threshold, and

channel quality indicators associated with the downlink carrier closest to the uplink carriers systematically indicate degraded performance due to self-interference; and

executing, in response to detection of the degraded downlink performance, an action to reduce self-interference between the uplink and downlink carriers, wherein said action comprises one of:

uplink scheduling to reduce self-interference,

deactivation of a secondary uplink carrier,

deactivation of a secondary downlink carrier, and

initiation of carrier reconfiguration to reduce self-interference.

2. The method according to claim 1 , wherein said set of predefined conditions further includes one or more of the following conditions:

channel quality indicator reports indicating a degrading downlink channel quality,

the user equipment transmits at near maximum power of the user equipment,

the user equipment transmits with approximately equal power level on the uplink carriers, and

channel quality indicators associated with the downlink carrier closest to the uplink carriers systematically indicate degraded performance due to self-interference.

3. The method according to claim 1 , wherein it is detected that the channel quality indicators associated with the downlink carrier closest to the uplink carriers systematically indicate degraded performance due to self-interference by:

detecting the channel quality indicators associated with the downlink carrier closest to the uplink carriers systematically indicate worse channel quality than what is indicated by channel quality indicators associated with the downlink carrier with the largest frequency separation from the uplink carriers, or

detecting the channel quality indicators associated with the downlink carrier closest to the uplink carriers systematically indicate worse channel quality for occasions when transmission occurs on the uplink carriers than for occasions when no transmission occurs on the uplink carriers.

4. The method according to claim 1 , wherein said action of uplink scheduling to reduce self-interference comprises scheduling to primarily use one first uplink carrier.

5. The method according to claim 4 , wherein scheduling to primarily use the first uplink carrier comprises at least one of:

filling up the uplink scheduling headroom of the first uplink carrier before scheduling on another uplink carrier; and

limiting a scheduled grant on a second uplink carrier different from the first uplink carrier.

6. The method according to claim 4 , wherein said first uplink carrier comprises the uplink carrier with the largest frequency separation from the closest downlink carrier.

7. The method according to claim 1 , wherein said action of deactivation of the secondary uplink carrier comprises deactivating the secondary uplink carrier with the smallest frequency separation from the closest downlink carrier.

8. The method according to claim 1 , wherein said action of deactivation of the secondary downlink carrier comprises deactivating the secondary downlink carrier with the smallest frequency separation to the closest uplink carrier.

9. The method according to claim 1 , wherein said action of initiation of carrier reconfiguration to reduce self-interference comprises sending a signaling message to a radio network controller to request carrier reconfiguration.

10. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising choosing the action to execute based on a set of predefined parameters comprising at least one of an uplink activity, a downlink activity, and a system load.

11. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising, in response to detecting that a condition of said set of predefined conditions no longer applies, executing a reversal action comprising one of:

uplink scheduling,

activation of a secondary uplink carrier,

activation of a secondary downlink carrier, and

initiation of carrier reconfiguration.

12. The method according to claim 11 , wherein executing said reversal action comprises executing said reversal action if one or more of the following occurs:

the channel quality indicator reports indicate increased downlink channel quality,

the user equipment transmits on a low total transmit power, and

the user equipment transmits with skew transmit power on the uplink carriers.

13. The method according to claim 1 , wherein said radio base station comprises a NodeB and wherein said cellular communications system supports Multi-Carrier High Speed Uplink Packet Access.

14. A radio base station for use in a cellular communications system, wherein the radio base station communicates with a user equipment using multiple uplink and multiple downlink carriers, the radio base station comprising a data processor configured to:

detect a degraded downlink performance on at least one of said multiple downlink carriers due to self-interference by determining that a set of predefined conditions applies, wherein said set of predefined conditions includes the following conditions:

a duplex distance below a predetermined first threshold, and

channel quality indicators associated with the downlink carrier closest to the uplink carriers systematically indicate degraded performance due to self-interference; and

execute, in response to detection of the degraded downlink performance, an action to reduce self-interference between the uplink and downlink carriers, wherein said action comprises one of:

uplink scheduling to reduce self-interference,

deactivation of a secondary uplink carrier,

deactivation of a secondary downlink carrier, and

initiation of carrier reconfiguration to reduce self-interference.

15. The radio base station according to claim 14 , wherein said set of predefined conditions further includes one or more of the following conditions:

channel quality indicator reports indicating a degrading downlink channel quality,

the user equipment transmits at near maximum power of the user equipment,

the user equipment transmits with approximately equal power level on the uplink carriers, and

channel quality indicators associated with the downlink carrier closest to the uplink carriers systematically indicate degraded performance due to self-interference.

16. The radio base station according to claim 14 , wherein the data processor detects that the channel quality indicators associated with the downlink carrier closest to the uplink carriers systematically indicate degraded performance due to self-interference by:

detecting the channel quality indicators associated with the downlink carrier closest to the uplink carriers systematically indicate worse channel quality than what is indicated by channel quality indicators associated with the downlink carrier with the largest frequency separation from the uplink carriers, or

detecting the channel quality indicators associated with the downlink carrier closest to the uplink carriers systematically indicate worse channel quality for occasions when transmission occurs on the uplink carriers than for occasions when no transmission occurs on the uplink carriers.

17. The radio base station according to claim 14 , wherein said action of uplink scheduling to reduce self-interference comprises scheduling to primarily use one first uplink carrier.

18. The radio base station according to claim 17 , wherein said data processor schedules to primarily use the first uplink carrier by at least one of:

filling up the uplink scheduling headroom of the first uplink carrier before scheduling on another uplink carrier; and

limiting a scheduled grant on a second uplink carrier different from the first uplink carrier.

19. The radio base station according to claim 17 , wherein said first uplink carrier comprises the uplink carrier with the largest frequency separation from the closest downlink carrier.

20. The radio base station according to claim 14 , wherein said data processor executes said action of deactivation of the secondary uplink carrier by deactivating the secondary uplink carrier with the smallest frequency separation from the closest downlink carrier.

21. The radio base station according to claim 14 , wherein said data processor executes said action of deactivation of the secondary downlink carrier by deactivating the secondary downlink carrier with the smallest frequency separation to the closest uplink carrier.

22. The radio base station according to claim 14 , wherein said data processor executes said action of initiation of carrier reconfiguration to reduce self-interference by sending a signaling message to a radio network controller to request carrier reconfiguration.

23. The radio base station according to claim 14 , wherein the data processor chooses the action to execute based on a set of predefined parameters comprises at least one of an uplink activity, a downlink activity, and a system load.

24. The radio base station according to claim 14 , wherein the data processor is further configured to, in response to detecting that a condition of said set of predefined conditions no longer applies, execute a reversal action comprising one of:

uplink scheduling,

activation of a secondary uplink carrier,

activation of a secondary downlink carrier, and

initiation of carrier reconfiguration.

25. The radio base station according to claim 24 , wherein the data processor executes said reversal action if one or more of the following occurs:

the channel quality indicator reports indicate increased downlink channel quality,

the user equipment transmits on a low total transmit power, and

the user equipment transmits with skew transmit power on the uplink carriers.

26. The radio base station according to claim 14 , wherein the radio base station comprises a NodeB and wherein said cellular communications system supports Multi-Carrier High Speed Uplink Packet Access.

Assignments (8)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jul 15, 2016
From: HPS INVESTMENT PARTNERS, LLC
To: OPTIS CELLULAR TECHNOLOGY, LLC
Reel/Frame 039359/0916 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE NATURE OF CONVEYANCE TO READ "SECURITY INTEREST" PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 032786 FRAME 0546. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE SECURITY INTEREST. Recorded Jul 8, 2014
From: OPTIS CELLULAR TECHNOLOGY, LLC
To: HIGHBRIDGE PRINCIPAL STRATEGIES, LLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 033281/0216 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 30, 2014
From: OPTIS CELLULAR TECHNOLOGY, LLC
To: HIGHBRIDGE PRINCIPAL STRATEGIES, LLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 032786/0546 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 23, 2014
From: CLUSTER LLC
To: OPTIS CELLULAR TECHNOLOGY, LLC
Reel/Frame 032326/0402 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 23, 2014
From: TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET L M ERICSSON (PUBL)
To: CLUSTER LLC
Reel/Frame 032326/0219 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Feb 6, 2014
From: OPTIS CELLULAR TECHNOLOGY, LLC
To: WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION (AS COLLATERAL AGENT)
Reel/Frame 032167/0406 →
LIEN Recorded Dec 20, 2013
From: OPTIS CELLULAR TECHNOLOGY, LLC
To: HIGHBRIDGE PRINCIPAL STRATEGIES, LLC (AS COLLATERAL AGENT)
Reel/Frame 031866/0697 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 9, 2013
From: JOHANSSON, KLAS; MUSIKKA, NIILO; NYBERG, HENRIK; WALLEN, ANDERS
To: TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET L M ERICSSON (PUBL)
Reel/Frame 029597/0550 →