IP Library Granted Patent US 8,874,434
Granted Patent B2
US 8,874,434 · App. 13/150,898 · Granted Oct 28, 2014

Method and apparatus for full natural language parsing

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,874,434
App. No.
13/150,898
Granted
Oct 28, 2014
Kind
B2
Abstract

The method and apparatus for discriminative natural language parsing, uses a deep convolutional neural network adapted for text and a structured tag inference in a graph. In the method and apparatus, a trained recursive convolutional graph transformer network, formed by the deep convolutional neural network and the graph, predicts “levels” of a parse tree based on predictions of previous levels.

Claims (176)

1. A method executed by a processor in communication with a memory storing a computer process tagger program that when executed by the processor generates a linguistic parse tree for a sentence, the method comprising the steps of:

predicting by the computer process tagger a first level of chunk tags for the sentence; and

predicting by the computer process at least a second level of chunk tags for the sentence using the first level or a previous level of chunk tags;

from the predicted chunk tags, determining a sum of scores S in a graph G for a tag path [t] 1 N for words [w] 1 N as

S

(

[

w

]

1

N

,

[

t

]

1

N

,

θ

)

=

n

=

1

N

(

A

t

n

-

1

t

n

+

s

(

x

n

)

t

n

)

,

where N is the number of words, θ represents trained parameters of a neural network of the tagger with a fixed-sized word dictionary W, trained parameter matrices M 1 and M 2 , and transition score A, each node G tn is assigned a score s(x n ) t n from the neural network of the tagger, and given a pair of nodes G tn and G um , an edge is added with a transition score A tu on the graph; and

outputting a graph with network scores provided for each G tn of the graph and additional transition scores for the edges of the graph.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the predicting steps are performed by a Graph Transformer Network (GTN).

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the GTN includes a deep convolutional neural network (CNN).

4. The method of claim 3 , wherein the CNN generates scores for potential chunk tags for words of the sentence.

5. The method of claim 2 , wherein for each level, further comprising the step of combining chunk tag scores of each word of a sequence words of the sentence, and transition scores between chunk tags of a pair of consecutive words to evaluate the score for the chunk tags of the sequence of words.

6. The method of claim 5 , wherein the combining step is performed with a Viterbi algorithm.

7. The method of claim 2 , wherein each of the predicting steps comprises the steps of:

finding vectors for different features of words of the sentence; and

combining the vectors as a whole feature vector.

8. The method of claim 2 , wherein each of the predicting steps uses long range dependency in the form of a lookup table.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the step of predicting at least a second level of chunk tags is performed so that any chunk at a level overlapping a chunk at the at least the second level must span at least this over-lapped chunk, and be larger.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein the determining steps are performed with a deep convolutional neural network (CNN).

11. The method of claim 10 , wherein the CNN generates scores for potential chunk tags for words of the sentence.

12. The method of claim 1 , wherein for each level, further comprising the step of combining chunk tag scores of each word of a sequence words of the sentence, and transition scores between chunk tags of a pair of consecutive words to evaluate the score for the chunk tags of the sequence of words.

13. The method of claim 12 , wherein the combining step is performed with a Viterbi algorithm.

14. The method of claim 1 , wherein each of the predicting steps comprises the steps of:

finding vectors for different features of words of the sentence; and

combining the vectors as a whole feature vector.

15. The method of claim 1 , wherein each of the predicting steps uses long range dependency in the form of a lookup table.

16. An apparatus for generating a linguistic parse tree for a sentence, the apparatus comprising:

a processor and a memory, the memory embodying instructions that when executed by the processor cause the processor to perform the functions of:

predicting a first level of chunk tags for the sentence; and

predicting at least a second level of chunk tags for the sentence using the first level or a previous level of chunk tags;

from the predicted chunk tags, determining a sum of scores S in a graph G for a tag path [t] 1 N for words [w] 1 N as

S

(

[

w

]

1

N

,

[

t

]

1

N

,

θ

)

=

n

=

1

N

(

A

t

n

-

1

t

n

+

s

(

x

n

)

t

n

)

,

where N is the number of words, θ represents trained parameters of a neural network of a tagger with a fixed-sized word dictionary W, trained parameter matrices M 1 and M 2 , and transition score A, each node G tn is assigned a score s(x n ) t n from the neural network of the tagger, and given a pair of nodes G tn and G um , an edge is added with a transition score A tu on the graph; and

outputting a graph with network scores provided for each G tn of the graph and additional transition scores for the edges of the graph.

17. An apparatus for generating a linguistic parse tree for a sentence, the apparatus comprising: a processor and a memory, the memory embodying code that when executed by the processor causes the processor to perform the functions of:

code for predicting, via a Graph Transformer Network (GTN), a first level of chunk tags for the sentence, and

code for predicting at least a second level of chunk tags for the sentence using the first level or a previous level of chunk tags;

code for determining a sum of scores S from the predicted chunk tags in a graph G for a tag path [t] 1 N for words [w] 1 N as

S

(

[

w

]

1

N

,

[

t

]

1

N

,

θ

)

=

n

=

1

N

(

A

t

n

-

1

t

n

+

s

(

x

n

)

t

n

)

,

where N is the number of words, θ represents trained parameters of a neural network of a tagger with a fixed-sized word dictionary W, trained parameter matrices M 1 and M 2 , and transition score A, each node G tn is assigned a score s(x n ) t n from the neural network of the tagger, and given a pair of nodes G tn and G um , an edge is added with a transition score A tu on the graph; and

outputting a graph with network scores provided for each G tn of the graph and additional transition scores for the edges of the graph.

18. The apparatus of claim 17 , wherein the GTN includes a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) for generating scores for potential chunk tags for words of the sentence.

19. The apparatus of claim 17 , wherein for each level, the GTN combines chunk tag scores of each word of a sequence words of the sentence, and transition scores between chunk tags of a pair of consecutive words to evaluate the score for the chunk tags of the sequence of words.

20. The apparatus of claim 17 , wherein the GTN predicts the levels of chunk tags by finding vectors for different features of words of the sentence; and combining the vectors as a whole feature vector.

21. The apparatus of claim 17 , wherein GTN uses long range dependency in the form of a lookup table to predict the levels of chunk tags.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 13, 2015
From: NEC LABORATORIES AMERICA, INC.
To: NEC CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 034765/0565 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 11, 2011
From: COLLOBERT, RONAN; BAI, BING
To: NEC LABORATORIES AMERICA, INC.
Reel/Frame 026570/0512 →