IP Library Granted Patent US 8,609,587
Granted Patent B2
US 8,609,587 · App. 13/161,925 · Granted Dec 17, 2013

Synergistic herbicidal compositions containing propyzamide and aminopyralid

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,609,587
App. No.
13/161,925
Granted
Dec 17, 2013
Kind
B2
Abstract

An herbicidal composition containing (a) propyzamide and (b) aminopyralid provides synergistic control of selected weeds in oilseed rape and in broadleaf, grass and perennial crops.

Claims (24)

1. A synergistic herbicidal mixture comprising an herbicidally effective amount of (a) propyzamide and (b) aminopyralid, wherein the ratio of propyzamide active ingredient weight to aminopyralid acid equivalent weight is from about 56:1 to about 224:1.

2. An herbicidal composition comprising an herbicidally effective amount of the synergistic herbicidal mixture of claim 1 and an agriculturally acceptable adjuvant or carrier.

3. A method of controlling undesirable vegetation which comprises contacting the seed, or locus of the crop before planting or emergence, or applying to the soil to control the growth and/or emergence of the undesirable vegetation, or applying to weeds prior to or after emergence of weeds, an herbicidally effective amount of the synergistic herbicidal mixture of claim 1 .

4. A method of controlling undesirable vegetation in oilseed rape, which comprises contacting the seed, or locus of the oilseed rape plant before planting or emergence, or applying to the soil to control the growth and/or emergence of the undesirable vegetation, or applying to weeds prior to or after emergence of weeds, an herbicidally effective amount of the synergistic herbicidal mixture of claim 1 .

5. A method of protecting winter oilseed rape against the phytotoxicity of aminopyralid which comprises safening the phytotoxicity of aminopyralid with propyzamide, wherein the ratio of propyzamide active ingredient weight to aminopyralid acid equivalent weight is from about 93:75:1 to about 140:1.

6. The synergistic mixture of claim 1 in which the ratio of propyzamide active ingredient weight to aminopyralid acid equivalent weight is between about 75:1 and about 125:1.

7. The method of claim 3 , wherein the undesirable vegetation is Matricaria, Papaver, Alopecurus, Poa , or Viola.

8. The method of claim 3 , wherein the undesirable vegetation is Matricaria recutita L., Matricaria spp. L, Papaver rhoeas L., Alopecurus myosuroides Huds., Poa annua L., or Viola arvensis Murr.

9. The method of claim 4 , wherein the undesirable vegetation is Matricaria, Papaver, Alopecurus, Poa , or Viola.

10. The method of claim 4 , wherein the undesirable vegetation is Matricaria recutita L., Matricaria spp. L, Papaver rhoeas L., Alopecurus myosuroides Huds., Poa annua L., or Viola arvensis Murr.

11. A method for controlling undesirable vegetation comprising contacting soil or the undesirable vegetation with a herbicidally effective amount of (a) propyzamide and (b) aminopyralid, wherein the ratio of propyzamide active ingredient weight to aminopyralid acid equivalent weight is from about 56:1 to about 224:1.

12. The method of claim 11 , wherein the soil or undesirable vegetation is contacted with a composition comprising aminopyralid and propyzamide.

13. The method of claim 11 , wherein the method is performed in the presence of a crop or crop seed.

14. The method of claim 13 , wherein the crop or crop seed is an oilseed rape crop or crop seed.

15. The method of claim 13 , wherein contacting is performed prior to emergence of the crop.

16. The method of claim 13 , wherein the contacting is performed after emergence of the crop.

17. The method of claim 13 , wherein the contacting is performed prior to emergence of the undesirable vegetation.

18. The method of claim 13 , wherein the contacting is performed after the emergence of the undesirable vegetation.

19. The method of claim 11 , wherein the weight ratio is from about 75:1 to about 140:1.

20. The method of claim 11 , wherein the undesirable vegetation is Matricaria, Papaver, Alopecurus, Poa , or Viola.

21. The method of claim 20 , wherein the undesirable vegetation is Matricaria recutita L., Matricaria spp. L, Papaver rhoeas L., Alopecurus myosuroides Huds., Poa annua L., or Viola arvensis Murr.

22. The method of claim 13 , wherein (a) the crop is glyphosate-tolerant and undesirable vegetation is further contacted with glyphosate; (b) the crop is glufosinate-tolerant and the undesirable vegetation is further contacted with glufosinate; (c) the crop is dicamba-tolerant and the undesirable vegetation is further contacted with dicamba; or (d) the crop is imidazolinone-tolerant and the undesirable vegetation is further contacted with an imidazolinone.

23. The mixture of claim 11 , wherein the ratio from about 75:1 to about 125:1.

24. The mixture of claim 11 , wherein the ratio is about 93:75:1.

Assignments (3)
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Nov 8, 2021
From: DOW AGROSCIENCES LLC
To: CORTEVA AGRISCIENCE LLC
Reel/Frame 058044/0184 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 8, 2013
From: MANN, RICHARD K.; GAUJAC, XAVIER DE
To: DOW AGROSCIENCES LLC
Reel/Frame 031569/0836 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 7, 2013
From: MANN, RICHARD K.; DE GAUJAC, XAVIER
To: DOW AGROSCIENCES LLC
Reel/Frame 029777/0123 →