IP Library Granted Patent US 8,463,919
Granted Patent B2
US 8,463,919 · App. 13/182,157 · Granted Jun 11, 2013

Process for associating data requests with site visits

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,463,919
App. No.
13/182,157
Granted
Jun 11, 2013
Kind
B2
Abstract

A process is disclosed for associating particular data requests from a user's computing device with particular site visits. The process includes determining whether the data requests are “forced content” requests, such as requests for advertisements. Such forced content requests, even if directed to a different domain from that of a site being visited, preferably are not treated as the end of the site visit or the start of a new site visit. The process may also consider other information regarding the data requests, such as whether they are requests for images, and whether they are directed to hosts associated with an open site visit.

Claims (26)

1. A method of classifying data requests from a user computing device, the method comprising:

accessing a record of data requests sent over a network by the user computing device to one or more hosts;

classifying at least a first data request represented in said record as being part of a visit to a first site; and

determining whether a subsequent data request represented in said record is part of the visit to the first site based at least partly on whether the subsequent data request is directed to a host that is classified as a source of forced content;

said method performed by a computer system.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the method comprises classifying the subsequent data request as being part of the visit to the first site in response to determining that the subsequent data request is directed to a host that is classified as a source of forced content.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the host is not a member of the first site.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the determination of whether the subsequent data request is part of the visit to the first site is additionally based on whether the host is one of a plurality of hosts that are classified as members of the first site.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the determination of whether the subsequent data request is part of the visit to the first site is additionally based on whether the subsequent data request is a request for an image.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the determination of whether the subsequent data request is part of the visit to the first site is additionally based on an amount of time that has transpired since a most recent interaction between the user computing device and the first site.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the method comprises classifying the subsequent data request as the start of a visit to a second site at least partly in response to determining that the subsequent data request (1) is not directed to a host classified as a source of forced content, (2) is not a request for an image, and (3) is not directed to a host that is a member of the first site.

8. A system capable of classifying data requests, the system comprising:

a computer data repository that stores a record of data requests associated with a user; and

a processor configured to classify the data requests by a process that comprises:

classifying at least a first data request represented in said record as being part of a visit by the user to a first site; and

determining whether a subsequent data request represented in said record is part of the visit to the first site based at least partly on whether the subsequent data request is directed to a host that is classified as a source of forced content.

9. The system of claim 8 , wherein the process comprises classifying the subsequent data request as being part of the visit to the first site in response to determining that the subsequent data request is directed to a host that is classified as a source of forced content.

10. The system of claim 8 , wherein the determination of whether the subsequent data request is part of the visit to the first site is additionally based on whether the host is classified as a member of the first site.

11. The system of claim 8 , wherein the determination of whether the subsequent data request is part of the visit to the first site is additionally based on whether the subsequent data request is a request for an image.

12. The system of claim 8 , wherein the determination of whether the subsequent data request is part of the visit to the first site is additionally based on an amount of time since a most recent interaction by the user with the first site.

13. The system of claim 8 , wherein the process comprises classifying the subsequent data request as the start of a visit to a second site at least partly in response to determining that the subsequent data request (1) is not directed to a host that is classified as a source of forced content, (2) is not a request for an image, and (3) is not directed to a host that is a member of the first site.

14. A computer system configured to access a record of data requests associated with a user, and to associate particular data requests represented therein with particular site visits by the user based on at least the following: (1) whether the data requests are directed to hosts that are classified as sources of forced content, and (2) whether the data requests are directed to hosts that are site members associated with open site visits.

15. The computer system of claim 14 , wherein the computer system is configured to associate the data requests with particular site visits based further on whether the data requests are requests for images.

16. The computer system of claim 14 , wherein the computer system is configured to associate the data requests with particular site visits based further on amounts of time that have transpired since most recent interactions by the user with particular sites.

17. The computer system of claim 14 , wherein the computer system is configured to associate the data requests with particular site visits based further on whether the requests are Secure Socket Layer requests.

18. The computer system of claim 14 , wherein the computer system is configured to treat a data request as a start of a new site visit at least partly in response to determining that the data request (1) is not directed to a host that is a member of an open site visit, (2) is not directed to a host that is classified as a source of forced content, and (3) is not a request for an image.

Assignments (7)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 22, 2019
From: CONNEXITY, INC.
To: CONNEXITY AUDIENCE, INC.
Reel/Frame 051087/0933 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Oct 4, 2016
From: LBC CREDIT PARTNERS III, L.P.
To: CONNEXITY, INC.; BECOME, INC.
Reel/Frame 039935/0233 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 30, 2016
From: HITWISE PTY LIMITED
To: CONNEXITY, INC.
Reel/Frame 038136/0778 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Dec 16, 2015
From: CONNEXITY, INC.; BECOME, INC.
To: LBC CREDIT PARTNERS III, L.P., AS AGENT
Reel/Frame 037300/0981 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 15, 2015
From: HITWISE PTY LIMITED
To: CONNEXITY, INC.
Reel/Frame 037294/0820 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 29, 2014
From: TARQUINI, MAUREEN MENDICK; ROBERTSON, MICHAEL CHAD; SANDEFUL, ROBERT ASHEVILLE, JR
To: PLURIMUS CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 032081/0722 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 29, 2014
From: JOHN NORTHEN, AS TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY FOR PLURIMUS CORPORATION, BANKRUPTCY NO. 01-83849
To: HITWISE PTY. LTD.
Reel/Frame 032081/0834 →