IP Library Granted Patent US 8,723,730
Granted Patent B2
US 8,723,730 · App. 13/191,696 · Granted May 13, 2014

System and method for direction finding and geolocation of emitters based on line-of-bearing intersections

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,723,730
App. No.
13/191,696
Granted
May 13, 2014
Kind
B2
Abstract

According to an embodiment of the present invention an emitter geolocation technique determines the geolocation of a radio frequency (RF) emitter using pair-wise line-of-bearing intersections that are derived from signal-to-noise ratios of transmitted signals received at a sensor. The technique may be employed with ground based vehicle or small unmanned air vehicles (UAV), and obtains reliable geolocation estimates of radio frequency (RF) emitters of interest.

Claims (398)

1. A system for locating an emitter comprising:

a plurality of antennas including a first antenna with a first radiation pattern and a second different antenna with a second radiation pattern different from the first radiation pattern, wherein the first and second radiation patterns provide a received signal gain with respect to signals received from said emitter;

a receiver to receive signals from each of said plurality of antennas transmitted by said emitter and obtain received signal strength measurements of said received signals at a plurality of different locations; and

a processor to process said received signal strength measurements to locate said emitter, wherein said processor includes:

a location module to:

process said received signal strength measurements and determine lines-of-bearing to said emitter based on a combination of received signal strength measurements of a signal received by each of said first antenna and said second antenna at said plurality of different locations; and

determine a location of said emitter based on intersections of said lines-of-bearing to said emitter at said plurality of different locations.

2. The system of claim 1 , wherein said received signal strength measurements include signal-to-noise ratio measurements of said signals received at said plurality of antennas.

3. The system of claim 2 , wherein said location module determines a maximum signal-to-noise ratio from said signal-to-noise ratio measurements and determines a line-of-bearing to said emitter based on said maximum signal-to-noise ratio.

4. The system of claim 2 , wherein said location module:

groups said received signal strength measurements into at least two clusters;

determines a maximum signal-to-noise ratio from said signal-to-noise ratio measurements within each cluster; and

determines a line-of-bearing to said emitter based on each of said maximum signal-to-noise ratios.

5. The system of claim 1 , wherein said location module determines said location by solving a set of simultaneous equations relating to said lines-of-bearing, wherein said set of simultaneous equations include unknown variables representing coordinates of said location of said emitter.

6. The system of claim 5 , wherein said set of simultaneous equations includes:

(

x

ij

y

ij

)

=

(

-

m

i

1

-

m

j

1

)

-

1

(

y

i

-

m

i

x

i

y

j

-

m

j

x

j

)

and wherein x ij y ij represent said coordinates of said location of said emitter, and (x i , y i ), (x j , y j ), (for i, j=1 to N, i·j) represent coordinates of said locations for obtaining said received signal strength measurements, and N represents a quantity of said locations for obtaining said received signal strength measurements.

7. The system of claim 5 , wherein said location module computes a line-of-bearing from each of said plurality of different locations within to said emitter.

8. The system of claim 7 , wherein said location module computes a plurality of line-of-bearing intersections that approximate said location of said emitter using line-of-bearing pairs.

9. The system of claim 8 , wherein said location module filters said plurality of line-of-bearing intersections by comparing each individual line-of-bearing intersection to filtering criteria, wherein when said individual line-of-bearing intersection does not meet said filtering criteria said individual line-of-bearing intersection is discarded.

10. The system of claim 8 , wherein said location module determines one or more arithmetic median value based geolocation centroids from selected ones of said plurality of line-of-bearing intersections.

11. The system of claim 10 , wherein said one or more geolocation centroids are determined using the set of equations:

x C =median( x 1 ,x 2 . . . x M )

y C =median ( y 1 ,y 2 . . . y M )

and wherein x C , y C represent coordinates of said geolocation centroid, and M represents a quantity of said line-of-bearing intersections.

12. The system of claim 10 , wherein said location module computes a root-mean-square error of said one or more geolocation centroids.

13. The system of claim 12 , wherein said location module computes said root-mean-square error of said one or more geolocation centroids using the set of equations:

Std

R

=

1

M

-

1

k

(

x

k

-

x

c

)

2

+

k

(

y

k

-

y

c

)

2

Std

I

=

1

M

-

1

k

(

x

k

-

x

c

)

2

+

k

(

y

k

-

y

c

)

2

for k=1, 2 . . . M, and wherein Std R and Std I represent root-mean-square errors with respect to opposite sides of an axis of symmetry, x C , y C represent coordinates of said geolocation centroid, x k , y k represent line-of-bearing intersection coordinates on a side of a line of symmetry and (x′ k , y′ k ) represent line-of-bearing intersection coordinates on an opposite side of said line of symmetry, and M represents a quantity of said line-of-bearing intersections.

14. The system of claim 13 , wherein said location module filters said one or more geolocation centroids by comparing a ratio of Std R and Std I to an error threshold, wherein when said ratio does not pass said error threshold a geolocation centroid used as a basis for said root-mean-square error computation is discarded.

15. The system of claim 1 , wherein said signals transmitted by said emitter include radio frequency signals.

16. The system of claim 1 , wherein said receiver is mounted on a mobile platform that traverses a pre-planned path to obtain said received signal strength measurements at said plurality of locations.

17. The system of claim 16 , wherein said mobile platform includes a terrain based vehicle or an unmanned aerial vehicle.

18. The system of claim 1 , further including a plurality of receivers each mounted on a stationary platform at a corresponding one of said plurality of locations to obtain said received signal strength measurements.

19. The system of claim 1 , wherein said first antenna comprises an omni-directional antenna and said second antenna comprises a directional antenna.

20. A method for locating an emitter comprising:

(a) receiving signals transmitted by said emitter via each of a plurality of antennas including a first antenna with a first radiation pattern and a second different antenna with a second radiation pattern different from the first radiation pattern, wherein the first and second radiation patterns provide a received signal gain with respect to signals received from said emitter, and obtaining received signal strength measurements of said received signals at a plurality of different locations; and

(b) processing said received signal strength measurements, via a processor, and determining lines-of-bearing to said emitter based on a combination of received signal strength measurements of a signal received by each of said first antenna and said second antenna at said plurality of different locations to determine a location of said emitter based on intersections of said lines-of-bearing to said emitter at said plurality of different locations.

21. The method of claim 20 , wherein step (b) further includes:

(b.1) determining said location using signal-to-noise ratio measurements of said signals received at said plurality of antennas.

22. The method of claim 21 , wherein step (b.1) further includes:

(b.1.1) determining a maximum signal-to-noise ratio from said signal-to-noise ratio measurements; and

(b.1.2) determining a line-of-bearing to said emitter based on said maximum signal-to-noise ratio.

23. The method of claim 21 , wherein step (b.1) further includes:

(b.1.1) grouping said received signal strength measurements into at least two clusters;

(b.1.2) determining a maximum signal-to-noise ratio from said signal-to-noise ratio measurements within each cluster; and

(b.1.3) determining a line-of-bearing to said emitter based on each of said maximum signal-to-noise ratios.

24. The method of claim 20 , wherein step (b) further includes:

(b.1) determining said location by solving a set of simultaneous equations relating to said lines-of-bearing, wherein said set of simultaneous equations include unknown variables representing coordinates of said location of said emitter.

25. The method of claim 24 , wherein said set of simultaneous equations includes:

(

x

ij

y

ij

)

=

(

-

m

i

1

-

m

j

1

)

-

1

(

y

i

-

m

i

x

i

y

j

-

m

j

x

j

)

and wherein x ij y ij represent said coordinates of said location of said emitter, and (x i , y i ), (x j , y j ), (for i, j=1 to N, i≠j) represent coordinates of said locations for obtaining said received signal strength measurements, and N represents a quantity of said locations for obtaining said received signal strength measurements.

26. The method of claim 24 , wherein step (b.1) further includes:

(b.1.1) computing a line-of-bearing from each of said plurality of different locations to said emitter.

27. The method of claim 26 , wherein step (b.1) further includes:

(b.1.2) computing a plurality of line-of-bearing intersections that approximate said location of said emitter using line-of-bearing pairs.

28. The method of claim 27 , wherein step (b) further includes:

(b.2) filtering said plurality of line-of-bearing intersections by comparing each individual line-of-bearing intersection to filtering criteria, wherein when said individual line-of-bearing intersection does not meet said filtering criteria said individual line-of-bearing intersection is discarded.

29. The method of claim 27 , wherein step (b) further includes:

(b.2) determining one or more arithmetic median value based geolocation centroids from selected ones of said plurality of line-of-bearing intersections.

30. The method of claim 29 , wherein said one or more geolocation centroids are determined using the set of equations:

x C =median( x 1 ,x 2 . . . x M )

y C =median ( y 1 ,y 2 . . . y M )

and wherein x C , y C represent coordinates of said geolocation centroid, and M represents a quantity of said line-of-bearing intersections.

31. The method of claim 30 , wherein step (b) further includes:

(b.3) computing a root-mean-square error of said one or more geolocation centroids.

32. The method of claim 31 , wherein step (b.3) computes said root-mean-square error of said one or more geolocation centroids using the set of equations:

Std

R

=

1

M

-

1

k

(

x

k

-

x

c

)

2

+

k

(

y

k

-

y

c

)

2

Std

I

=

1

M

-

1

k

(

x

k

-

x

c

)

2

+

k

(

y

k

-

y

c

)

2

for k=1, 2 . . . M, and wherein Std R and Std I represent root-mean-square errors with respect to opposite sides of an axis of symmetry, x C , y C represent coordinates of said geolocation centroid, x k , y k represent line-of-bearing intersection coordinates on a side of a line of symmetry and (x′ k , y′ k ) represent line-of-bearing intersection coordinates on an opposite side of said line of symmetry, and M represents a quantity of said line-of-bearing intersections.

33. The method of claim 32 , wherein step (b) further includes:

(b.4) filtering said one or more geolocation centroids by comparing a ratio of Std R and Std I to an error threshold, wherein when said ratio does not pass said error threshold a geolocation centroid used as a basis for said root-mean-square error computation is discarded.

34. The method of claim 20 , wherein said first antenna comprises an omni-directional antenna and aid second antenna comprises a directional antenna.

35. A program product apparatus comprising a non-transitory computer readable memory device with computer program logic recorded thereon for locating an emitter, wherein a receiver receives signals transmitted by said emitter via each of a plurality of antennas including a first antenna with a first radiation pattern and a second different antenna with a second radiation pattern different from the first radiation pattern to obtain received signal strength measurements of said received signals at a plurality of different locations, said program product apparatus further comprising:

a location module to process said received signal strength measurements of signals transmitted by said emitter and obtained at a plurality of different locations, and determine lines-of-bearing to said emitter based on a combination of received signal strength measurements of a signal received by each of said first antenna and said second antenna at said plurality of different locations to determine a location of said emitter based on intersections of aid lines-of-bearing to said emitter at said plurality of different locations.

36. The apparatus of claim 35 , wherein said received signal strength measurements include signal-to-noise ratio measurements of said signals received at said plurality of antennas.

37. The apparatus of claim 36 , wherein said location module determines a maximum signal-to-noise ratio from said signal-to-noise ratio measurements and determines a line-of-bearing to said emitter based on said maximum signal-to-noise ratio.

38. The apparatus of claim 36 , wherein said location module:

groups said received signal strength measurements into at least two clusters;

determines a maximum signal-to-noise ratio from said signal-to-noise ratio measurements within each cluster; and

determines a line-of-bearing to said emitter based on each of said maximum signal-to-noise ratios.

39. The apparatus of claim 35 , wherein said location module determines said location by solving a set of simultaneous equations relating to said lines-of-bearing, wherein said set of simultaneous equations include unknown variables representing coordinates of said location of said emitter.

40. The apparatus of claim 39 , wherein said set of simultaneous equations includes:

(

x

ij

y

ij

)

=

(

-

m

i

1

-

m

j

1

)

-

1

(

y

i

-

m

i

x

i

y

j

-

m

j

x

j

)

and wherein x ij y ij represent said coordinates of said location of said emitter, and (x i , y i ), (x j , y j ), (for i, j=1 to N, i≠j) represent coordinates of said locations for obtaining said measurements, and N represents a quantity of said locations for obtaining said received signal strength measurements.

41. The apparatus of claim 39 , wherein said location module computes a line-of-bearing from each of said plurality of different locations to said emitter.

42. The apparatus of claim 41 , wherein said location module computes a plurality of line-of-bearing intersections that approximate said location of said emitter using line-of-bearing pairs.

43. The apparatus of claim 42 , wherein said location module filters said plurality of line-of-bearing intersections by comparing each individual line-of-bearing intersection to filtering criteria, wherein when said individual line-of-bearing intersection does not meet said filtering criteria said individual line-of-bearing intersection is discarded.

44. The apparatus of claim 42 , wherein said location module determines one or more arithmetic median value based geolocation centroids from selected ones of said plurality of line-of-bearing intersections.

45. The apparatus of claim 44 , wherein said one or more geolocation centroids are determined using the set of equations:

x C =median( x 1 ,x 2 . . . x M )

y C =median ( y 1 ,y 2 . . . y M )

and wherein x C , y C represent coordinates of said geolocation centroid, and M represents a quantity of said line-of-bearing intersections.

46. The apparatus of claim 44 , wherein said location module computes a root-mean-square error of said one or more geolocation centroids.

47. The apparatus of claim 46 , wherein said location module computes said root-mean-square error of said one or more geolocation centroids using the set of equations:

Std

R

=

1

M

-

1

k

(

x

k

-

x

c

)

2

+

k

(

y

k

-

y

c

)

2

Std

I

=

1

M

-

1

k

(

x

k

-

x

c

)

2

+

k

(

y

k

-

y

c

)

2

for k=1, 2 . . . M, and wherein Std R and Std I represent root-mean-square errors with respect to opposite sides of an axis of symmetry, x C , y C represent coordinates of said geolocation centroid, x k , y k represent line-of-bearing intersection coordinates on a side of a line of symmetry and (x′ k , y′ k ) represent line-of-bearing intersection coordinates on an opposite side of said line of symmetry, and M represents a quantity of said line-of-bearing intersections.

48. The apparatus of claim 47 , wherein said location module filters said one or more geolocation centroids by comparing a ratio of Std R and Std I to an error threshold, wherein when said ratio does not pass said error threshold a geolocation centroid used as a basis for said root-mean-square error computation is discarded.

49. The apparatus of claim 35 , wherein said first antenna comprises an omni-directional antenna and said second antenna comprises a directional antenna.

Assignments (4)
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Nov 19, 2018
From: HARRIS SOLUTIONS NY, INC.
To: HARRIS GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 047598/0361 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 19, 2018
From: HARRIS CORPORATION
To: HARRIS SOLUTIONS NY, INC.
Reel/Frame 047600/0598 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 18, 2012
From: ITT MANUFACTURING ENTERPRISES LLC (FORMERLY KNOWN AS ITT MANUFACTURING ENTERPRISES, INC.)
To: EXELIS INC.
Reel/Frame 027550/0550 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 27, 2011
From: LU, NING HSING; CHAN, CHI CHIU; SHI, QUN
To: ITT MANUFACTURING ENTERPRISES, INC.
Reel/Frame 026659/0473 →