IP Library Granted Patent US 8,972,256
Granted Patent B2
US 8,972,256 · App. 13/274,694 · Granted Mar 3, 2015

System and method for dynamic noise adaptation for robust automatic speech recognition

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,972,256
App. No.
13/274,694
Granted
Mar 3, 2015
Kind
B2
Abstract

A speech processing method and arrangement are described. A dynamic noise adaptation (DNA) model characterizes a speech input reflecting effects of background noise. A null noise DNA model characterizes the speech input based on reflecting a null noise mismatch condition. A DNA interaction model performs Bayesian model selection and re-weighting of the DNA model and the null noise DNA model to realize a modified DNA model characterizing the speech input for automatic speech recognition and compensating for noise to a varying degree depending on relative probabilities of the DNA model and the null noise DNA model.

Claims (28)

1. A method comprising:

characterizing, by a computing device, a speech input based on a dynamic noise adaptation (DNA) model reflecting effects of background noise;

characterizing the speech input based on a null noise DNA model reflecting a null noise mismatch condition; and

performing Bayesian model selection and re-weighting of the DNA model and the null noise DNA model to realize a modified DNA model characterizing the speech input for automatic speech recognition and compensating for noise to a varying degree depending on relative probabilities of the DNA model and the null noise DNA model,

wherein the Bayesian model selection and re-weighting reflects a competing likelihood of which model best characterizes the speech input, and

wherein re-weighting the DNA model and the null noise DNA model includes assigning zero probability to the DNA model predicted by Bayesian model averaging when the DNA model does not best characterize the speech input.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein re-weighting the DNA model and the null noise DNA model includes averaging.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein re-weighting the DNA model and the null noise DNA model includes increasing the probability of the DNA model predicted by Bayesian model averaging when the DNA model best characterizes the speech input.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the DNA model includes a probability based noise model reflecting transient and evolving components of a current noise estimate.

5. A non-transitory computer-readable medium storing computer-readable instructions that, when executed by a processor, cause a device to:

characterize a speech input based on a dynamic noise adaptation (DNA) model reflecting effects of background noise;

characterize the speech input based on a null noise DNA model reflecting a null noise mismatch condition; and

perform Bayesian model selection and re-weighting of the DNA model and the null noise DNA model to realize a modified DNA model characterizing the speech input for automatic speech recognition and compensating for noise to a varying degree depending on relative probabilities of the DNA model and the null noise DNA model,

wherein the Bayesian model selection and re-weighting reflects a competing likelihood of which model best characterizes the speech input, and

wherein re-weighting the DNA model and the null noise DNA model includes assigning zero probability to the DNA model predicted by Bayesian model averaging when the DNA model does not best characterize the speech input.

6. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 5 , wherein re-weighting the DNA model and the null noise DNA model includes averaging.

7. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 5 , wherein re-weighting the DNA model and the null noise DNA model includes increasing the probability of the DNA model predicted by Bayesian model averaging when the DNA model best characterizes the speech input.

8. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 5 , wherein the DNA model includes a probability based noise model reflecting transient and evolving components of a current noise estimate.

9. A method comprising:

characterizing, by a computing device, a speech input based on a dynamic noise adaptation (DNA) model reflecting effects of background noise;

characterizing the speech input based on a null noise DNA model reflecting a null noise mismatch condition; and

performing Bayesian model selection and re-weighting of the DNA model and the null noise DNA model to realize a modified DNA model characterizing the speech input for automatic speech recognition and compensating for noise to a varying degree depending on relative probabilities of the DNA model and the null noise DNA model,

wherein the Bayesian model selection and re-weighting reflects a competing likelihood of which model best characterizes the speech input,

wherein re-weighting the DNA model and the null noise DNA model includes reducing the probability of the DNA model predicted by Bayesian model averaging when the DNA model does not best characterize the speech input, and

wherein re-weighting the DNA model and the null noise DNA model includes increasing the probability of the DNA model predicted by Bayesian model averaging when the DNA model best characterizes the speech input.

10. The method of claim 9 , wherein re-weighting the DNA model and the null noise DNA model includes averaging.

11. The method of claim 9 , wherein re-weighting the DNA model and the null noise DNA model includes assigning zero probability to the DNA model predicted by Bayesian model averaging when the DNA model does not best characterize the speech input.

12. The method of claim 9 , wherein the DNA model includes a probability based noise model reflecting transient and evolving components of a current noise estimate.

Assignments (7)
RELEASE (REEL 052935 / FRAME 0584) Recorded Jan 2, 2025
From: WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
To: CERENCE OPERATING COMPANY
Reel/Frame 069797/0818 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE REPLACE THE CONVEYANCE DOCUMENT WITH THE NEW ASSIGNMENT PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 050836 FRAME: 0191. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT. Recorded Apr 19, 2022
From: NUANCE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
To: CERENCE OPERATING COMPANY
Reel/Frame 059804/0186 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jun 15, 2020
From: CERENCE OPERATING COMPANY
To: WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
Reel/Frame 052935/0584 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jun 12, 2020
From: BARCLAYS BANK PLC
To: CERENCE OPERATING COMPANY
Reel/Frame 052927/0335 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Nov 7, 2019
From: CERENCE OPERATING COMPANY
To: BARCLAYS BANK PLC
Reel/Frame 050953/0133 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE ASSIGNEE NAME PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 050836 FRAME: 0191. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AGREEMENT. Recorded Oct 29, 2019
From: NUANCE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
To: CERENCE OPERATING COMPANY
Reel/Frame 050871/0001 →
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AGREEMENT Recorded Oct 23, 2019
From: NUANCE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
To: CERENCE INC.
Reel/Frame 050836/0191 →