IP Library Granted Patent US 8,725,193
Granted Patent B2
US 8,725,193 · App. 13/288,270 · Granted May 13, 2014

Adaptive A-MPR in inter-band carrier aggregation

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,725,193
App. No.
13/288,270
Granted
May 13, 2014
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method to prevent reception interference caused by inter-band CA is described. The method includes receiving instructions to concurrently operate on a first and second band. A first MPR is associated with the first band and a second MPR is associated with the second band. In response to determining that the concurrent operation on the first band and the second band would cause desensitization, a power adjustment is selected. The power adjustment includes a first A-MPR for the first band and/or a second A-MPR for the second band. In response to determining that the device can concurrently operate on the first band and the second band when the power adjustment is applied, the power adjustment is applied. Apparatus and computer readable media are also described.

Claims (56)

1. A method comprising:

receiving instructions to concurrently operate on a first band and a second band, where a first maximum power reduction is associated with the first band and a second maximum power reduction is associated with the second band;

determining whether concurrent operation on the first band and the second band would cause desensitization in at least one receiver band;

in response to determining that the concurrent operation on the first band and the second band would cause desensitization, selecting a power adjustment, where the power adjustment comprises at least one of: a first additional maximum power reduction for the first band and a second additional maximum power reduction for the second band;

determining whether a device can concurrently operate on the first band and the second band when the power adjustment is applied; and

in response to determining that the device can concurrently operate on the first band and the second band when the power adjustment is applied, applying the power adjustment.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising in response to determining that the device cannot concurrently operate on the first band and the second band when the power adjustment is applied, performing at least one of:

switching the device to a one uplink and two downlink mode,

decreasing the output power of one of the first band and the second band to a minimum output power level and

informing a network element that the device cannot concurrently operate on the first band and the second band.

3. The method of claim 1 , where selecting the power adjustment comprises selecting a power adjustment based at least in part on the first band and the second band.

4. The method of claim 1 , where applying the power adjustment comprises at least one of:

adding the first additional maximum power reduction on top of the first maximum power reduction of the first band and

adding the second additional maximum power reduction on top of the second maximum power reduction of the second band.

5. The method of claim 1 , where determining whether the device can concurrently operate on the first band and the second band when the power adjustment is applied comprises determining whether applying the power adjustment would cause the device to be outside a coverage area for at least one of: the first band and the second band.

6. The method of claim 1 , where determining whether concurrent operation on the first band and the second band would cause desensitization comprises determining whether transmission on one of the first band and the second band creates a harmonic interference for reception on at least one of the first band and the second band.

7. The method of claim 1 , where determining whether concurrent operation on the first band and the second band would cause desensitization comprises determining whether transmission on both the first band and the second band creates an inter-modulation interference for reception on at least one of the first band and the second band.

8. An apparatus, comprising at least one processor; and at least one memory including computer program code, the at least one memory and the computer program code configured to, with the at least one processor, cause the apparatus to perform at least the following:

to receive instructions to concurrently operate on a first band and a second band, where a first maximum power reduction is associated with the first band and a second maximum power reduction is associated with the second band;

to determine whether concurrent operation on the first band and the second band would cause desensitization in at least one receiver band;

in response to determining that the concurrent operation on the first band and the second band would cause desensitization, to select a power adjustment, where the power adjustment comprises at least one of: a first additional maximum power reduction for the first band and a second additional maximum power reduction for the second band;

to determine whether a device can concurrently operate on the first band and the second band when the power adjustment is applied; and

in response to determining that the device can concurrently operate on the first band and the second band when the power adjustment is applied, to apply the power adjustment.

9. The apparatus of claim 8 , where the at least one memory and the computer program code are further configured to cause the apparatus, in response to determining that the device cannot concurrently operate on the first band and the second band when the power adjustment is applied, to perform at least one of:

switching the device to a one uplink and two downlink mode,

decreasing the output power of one of the first band and the second band to a minimum output power level and

informing a network element that the device cannot concurrently operate on the first band and the second band.

10. The apparatus of claim 8 , where selecting the power adjustment comprises selecting a power adjustment based at least in part on the first band and the second band.

11. The apparatus of claim 8 , where applying the power adjustment comprises at least one of:

adding the first additional maximum power reduction on top of the first maximum power reduction of the first band and

adding the second additional maximum power reduction on top of the second maximum power reduction of the second band.

12. The apparatus of claim 8 , where determining whether the device can concurrently operate on the first band and the second band when the power adjustment is applied comprises determining whether applying the power adjustment would cause the device to be outside a coverage area for at least one of: the first band and the second band.

13. The apparatus of claim 8 , where determining whether concurrent operation on the first band and the second band would cause desensitization comprises determining whether transmission on one of the first band and the second band creates one of: a harmonic interference and an inter-modulation interference for reception on at least one of one of the first band and the second band for reception.

14. A computer readable medium tangibly encoded with a computer program executable by a processor to perform actions comprising:

receiving instructions to concurrently operate on a first band and a second band, where a first maximum power reduction is associated with the first band and a second maximum power reduction is associated with the second band;

determining whether concurrent operation on the first band and the second band would cause desensitization in at least one receiver band;

in response to determining that the concurrent operation on the first band and the second band would cause desensitization, selecting a power adjustment, where the power adjustment comprises at least one of: a first additional maximum power reduction for the first band and a second additional maximum power reduction for the second band;

determining whether a device can concurrently operate on the first band and the second band when the power adjustment is applied; and

in response to determining that the device can concurrently operate on the first band and the second band when the power adjustment is applied, applying the power adjustment.

15. The computer readable medium of claim 14 , where the actions further comprise in response to determining that the device cannot concurrently operate on the first band and the second band when the power adjustment is applied, performing at least one of:

switching the device to a one uplink and two downlink mode,

decreasing the output power of one of the first band and the second band to a minimum output power level and

informing a network element that the device cannot concurrently operate on the first band and the second band.

16. The computer readable medium of claim 14 , where selecting the power adjustment comprises selecting a power adjustment based at least in part on the first band and the second band.

17. An apparatus comprising:

means for receiving instructions to concurrently operate on a first band and a second band, where a first maximum power reduction is associated with the first band and a second maximum power reduction is associated with the second band;

first means for determining whether concurrent operation on the first band and the second band would cause desensitization in at least one receiver band;

means for selecting a power adjustment in response to determining that the concurrent operation on the first band and the second band would cause desensitization, where the power adjustment comprises at least one of: a first additional maximum power reduction for the first band and a second additional maximum power reduction for the second band;

second means for determining whether a device can concurrently operate on the first band and the second band when the power adjustment is applied; and

means for applying the power adjustment in response to determining that the device can concurrently operate on the first band and the second band when the power adjustment is applied.

18. The apparatus of claim 17 , further comprising means for performing, in response to determining that the device cannot concurrently operate on the first band and the second band when the power adjustment is applied, at least one of:

switching the apparatus to a one uplink and two downlink mode,

decreasing the output power of one of the first band and the second band to a minimum output power level and

informing a network element that the device cannot concurrently operate on the first band and the second band.

19. The apparatus of claim 17 , where the selecting means comprises means for selecting a power adjustment based at least in part on the first band and the second band.

20. The apparatus of claim 17 , where the second determining means comprises means for determining whether applying the power adjustment would cause the device to be outside a coverage area for at least one of: the first band and the second band.

Assignments (9)
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE CONVEYING PARTY PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 032086 FRAME 0389. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT FROM ONE OR BOTH ASSIGNORS ACCORDING TO PRIOR AGREEMENT.. Recorded Dec 18, 2017
From: RENESAS MOBILE CORPORATION
To: BROADCOM INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
Reel/Frame 046266/0231 →
TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS Recorded Feb 3, 2017
From: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: BROADCOM CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 041712/0001 →
PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Feb 11, 2016
From: BROADCOM CORPORATION
To: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 037806/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 7, 2015
From: BROADCOM CORPORATION; BROADCOM INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
To: XIAOMI H.K. LIMITED
Reel/Frame 037220/0963 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 29, 2015
From: BROADCOM INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
To: BROADCOM CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 036710/0819 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 29, 2015
From: RENESAS ELECTRONICS CORPORATION; RENESAS MOBILE CORPORATION
To: BROADCOM INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
Reel/Frame 036710/0411 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 20, 2014
From: BROADCOM INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
To: BROADCOM CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 032088/0794 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 17, 2014
From: RENESAS ELECTRONICS CORPORATION; RENESAS MOBILE CORPORATION
To: BROADCOM INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
Reel/Frame 032086/0389 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 14, 2011
From: IMMONEN, ANTTI O.; KAUKOVUORI, JOUNI K.; HENTTONEN, TERO MATTI
To: RENESAS MOBILE CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 027285/0178 →