IP Library Granted Patent US 8,505,362
Granted Patent B2
US 8,505,362 · App. 13/295,211 · Granted Aug 13, 2013

Method for pipeline conditioning

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,505,362
App. No.
13/295,211
Granted
Aug 13, 2013
Kind
B2
Abstract

Method for dewatering, pressure testing, hydrotreating, suppressing methane hydrate formation and suppressing solution freezing point in pipeline operations have been disclosed, where the solution used in the operations includes an effective amount of a metal formate salt. The metal formate salt solutions have a low viscosity, have a high density, have a low metals corrosivity, are non-volatile, have a low solubility in hydrocarbons, are readily biodegradable, have a low toxicity, are non-hazardous, have a low environmental impact, have a freezing point depression property forming water/formate eutectic point mixtures, and have a water-structuring and water activity modification property.

Claims (14)

1. A method for conditioning pipelines comprising the steps of:

filling a pipeline or portion thereof with a first aqueous composition including a first effective amount of a metal ion formate salt,

pressurizing the pipeline to a desired test pressure, where the first effective amount is sufficient to reduce an amount of bulk water and/or an amount of residual water in the pipeline below desired amounts thereby suppressing gas hydrate formation and/or reducing a freezing point of the aqueous composition to a desired sub-freezing point temperature at the test pressure, and

discharging the first aqueous composition directly into the environment without further processing or treatment after the pressurizing.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the metal ion formate salt is a compound of the formula (HCOO − ) n M n+ and mixtures thereof, where M is a metal ion and n is the valency of the metal ion.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the metal ion is selected from the group consisting of an alkali metal ion, an alkaline metal ion, a transition metal ion, a lanthanide metal ion, and mixtures thereof.

4. The method of claim 3 , wherein the alkali metal ion is selected from the group consisting of Li + , Na + , K + , Rd + , Cs + , and mixtures thereof.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein the alkali metal ion is K + .

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first effective amount is between about 5% w/w of metal ion formate salt to water and a saturation solution of the metal ion formate salt in water.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first effective amount is between about 25% w/w of metal ion formate salt to water and a saturation solution of the metal ion formate salt in water.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first effective amount is between about 45% w/w of metal ion formate salt to water and a saturation solution of the metal ion formate salt in water.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first effective amount is between about 65% w/w of metal ion formate salt to water and a saturation solution of the metal ion formate salt in water.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein the desired test pressure is a percentage of a maximum allowable operating pressure.

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein the desired test pressure is a percentage of a pipeline design pressure.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 4, 2014
From: WEATHERFORD/LAMB, INC.
To: WEATHERFORD TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS, LLC
Reel/Frame 034526/0272 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 6, 2014
From: CLEARWATER INTERNATIONAL, L.L.C.
To: WEATHERFORD/LAMB, INC.
Reel/Frame 031892/0495 →