IP Library Granted Patent US 8,576,705
Granted Patent B2
US 8,576,705 · App. 13/300,101 · Granted Nov 5, 2013

Upstream channel bonding partial service using spectrum management

Inventors: Brian K. Thibeault (Attleboro, MA); Michael J. Cooper (Augusta, GA); Marc L. Morrissette (Plainville, MA)
Assignee: General Instrument Corporation
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,576,705
App. No.
13/300,101
Granted
Nov 5, 2013
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method and computing device receives data packets on an upstream bonding group in full service mode, where the upstream bonding group includes a set of channels and each channel has a transmission quality. The method detects that a select channel in the set of channels is impaired when the transmission quality of the select channel is below a threshold value, and transitions the receiving of the data packets from full service mode to partial service mode by disabling data grant scheduling on the select channel. The method monitors the select channel using a spectrum management method while the receiving of the data packets is in partial service mode. The method transitions the receiving of the data packets from partial service mode to full service mode when a result from the spectrum management method indicates that the select channel can transmit data packets error free.

Claims (77)

1. A method, comprising:

receiving data packets on an upstream bonding group in full service mode, the upstream bonding group including a set of channels, each channel having a transmission quality;

detecting that a select channel in the set of channels is impaired when the transmission quality of the select channel is below a threshold value;

transitioning the receiving of the data packets from full service mode to partial service mode by disabling data grant scheduling on the select channel;

monitoring the select channel using a spectrum management method while the receiving of the data packets is in partial service mode; and

transitioning the receiving of the data packets from partial service mode to full service mode when a result from the spectrum management method indicates that the select channel can transmit data packets error free.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the receiving of the data packets is in a cable modem termination system (CMTS), and from a cable modem.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the detecting that the select channel in the set of channels is impaired further comprises:

obtaining a result from the spectrum management method for the select channel; and

comparing the result from the spectrum management method to the threshold value.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the transitioning of the receiving of the data packets from full service mode to partial service mode further comprises:

attempting to correct the select channel by changing an upstream frequency of the select channel.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the transitioning of the receiving of the data packets from full service mode to partial service mode further comprises:

attempting to correct the select channel by dropping the select channel to a lower modulation mode.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the monitoring of the select channel further comprises:

obtaining a value from a quality metric for the select channel, where the value is the result from the spectrum management method; and

comparing the value from the quality metric to the threshold value,

wherein the select channel can transmit data packets error free when the value from the quality metric meets or exceeds the threshold value.

7. The method of claim 6 , wherein the quality metric includes at least one of modulation error ratio (MER), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and carrier-to-noise ratio (CNR).

8. The method of claim 6 , further comprising:

waiting for a hold down time;

obtaining a new value from the quality metric after the hold down time expires; and

comparing the new value from the quality metric to the threshold value,

wherein the select channel can transmit data packets error free when the value from the quality metric and the new value from the quality metric meet or exceed the threshold value.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the monitoring of the select channel further comprises:

obtaining a value from a fast Fourier transform (FFT) for the select channel, where the value is the result from the spectrum management method; and

comparing the value from the FFT to the threshold value,

wherein the select channel can transmit data packets error free when the value from the FFT meets or exceeds the threshold value.

10. The method of claim 9 , further comprising:

waiting for a hold down time;

obtaining a new value from the FFT after the hold down time expires; and

comparing the new value from the FFT to the threshold value,

wherein the select channel can transmit data packets error free when the value from the FFT and the new value from the FFT meet or exceed the threshold value.

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein the transitioning of the receiving of the data packets from partial service mode to full service mode further comprises:

scheduling data packets on the select channel.

12. A computing device, comprising:

a memory device resident in the computing device; and

a processor disposed in communication with the memory device, the processor configured to:

receive data packets on an upstream bonding group in full service mode, the upstream bonding group including a set of channels, each channel having a transmission quality;

detect that a select channel in the set of channels is impaired when the transmission quality of the select channel is below a threshold value;

transition the receiving of the data packets from full service mode to partial service mode by disabling data grant scheduling on the select channel;

monitor the select channel using a spectrum management method while the receiving of the data packets is in partial service mode; and

transition the receiving of the data packets from partial service mode to full service mode when a result from the spectrum management method indicates that the select channel can transmit data packets error free.

13. The computing device of claim 12 , wherein to detect that the select channel in the set of channels is impaired, the processor is further configured to:

obtain a result from the spectrum management method for the select channel; and

compare the result from the spectrum management method to the threshold value.

14. The computing device of claim 12 , wherein to transition the receiving of the data packets from full service mode to partial service mode, the processor is further configured to:

attempt to correct the select channel by changing an upstream frequency of the select channel.

15. The computing device of claim 12 , wherein to transition the receiving of the data packets from full service mode to partial service mode, the processor is further configured to:

attempt to correct the select channel by dropping the select channel to a lower modulation mode.

16. The computing device of claim 12 , wherein to monitor the select channel, the processor is further configured to:

obtain a value from a quality metric for the select channel, where the value is the result from the spectrum management method; and

compare the value from the quality metric to the threshold value,

wherein the select channel can transmit data packets error free when the value from the quality metric meets or exceeds the threshold value.

17. The computing device of claim 16 , wherein the quality metric includes at least one of modulation error ratio (MER), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and carrier-to-noise ratio (CNR).

18. The computing device of claim 16 , wherein the processor is further configured to:

wait for a hold down time;

obtain a new value from the quality metric after the hold down time expires; and

compare the new value from the quality metric to the threshold value,

wherein the select channel can transmit data packets error free when the value from the quality metric and the new value from the quality metric meet or exceed the threshold value.

19. The computing device of claim 12 , wherein to monitor the select channel, the processor is further configured to:

obtain a value from a fast Fourier transform (FFT) for the select channel, where the value is the result from the spectrum management method; and

compare the value from the FFT to the threshold value,

wherein the select channel can transmit data packets error free when the value from the FFT meets or exceeds the threshold value.

20. The computing device of claim 19 , wherein the processor is further configured to:

wait for a hold down time;

obtain a new value from the FFT after the hold down time expires; and

compare the new value from the FFT to the threshold value,

wherein the select channel can transmit data packets error free when the value from the FFT and the new value from the FFT meet or exceed the threshold value.

21. The computing device of claim 12 , wherein to transition the receiving of the data packets from partial service mode to full service mode, the processor is further configured to:

schedule data packets on the select channel.

22. A non-transitory computer-readable medium, comprising computer-executable instructions that, when executed on a computing device, perform steps of:

receiving data packets on an upstream bonding group in full service mode, the upstream bonding group including a set of channels, each channel having a transmission quality;

detecting that a select channel in the set of channels is impaired when the transmission quality of the select channel is below a threshold value;

transitioning the receiving of the data packets from full service mode to partial service mode by disabling data grant scheduling on the select channel;

monitoring the select channel using a spectrum management method while the receiving of the data packets is in partial service mode; and

transitioning the receiving of the data packets from partial service mode to full service mode when a result from the spectrum management method indicates that the select channel can transmit data packets error free.

Assignments (13)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST AT REEL/FRAME 049905/0504 Recorded Dec 19, 2024
From: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: ARRIS ENTERPRISES LLC (F/K/A ARRIS ENTERPRISES, INC.); ARRIS TECHNOLOGY, INC.; ARRIS SOLUTIONS, INC.; COMMSCOPE, INC. OF NORTH CAROLINA; COMMSCOPE TECHNOLOGIES LLC; RUCKUS WIRELESS, LLC (F/K/A RUCKUS WIRELESS, INC.)
Reel/Frame 071477/0255 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Dec 17, 2024
From: ARRIS ENTERPRISES LLC; COMMSCOPE TECHNOLOGIES LLC; COMMSCOPE INC., OF NORTH CAROLINA; OUTDOOR WIRELESS NETWORKS LLC; RUCKUS IP HOLDINGS LLC
To: APOLLO ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCY LLC
Reel/Frame 069889/0114 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 23, 2022
From: ARRIS TECHNOLOGY, INC.
To: ARRIS ENTERPRISES, INC.
Reel/Frame 060791/0583 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 19, 2021
From: ARRIS SOLUTIONS, INC.; ARRIS ENTERPRISES LLC; COMMSCOPE TECHNOLOGIES LLC; COMMSCOPE, INC. OF NORTH CAROLINA; RUCKUS WIRELESS, INC.
To: WILMINGTON TRUST
Reel/Frame 060752/0001 →
TERM LOAN SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jul 3, 2019
From: COMMSCOPE, INC. OF NORTH CAROLINA; COMMSCOPE TECHNOLOGIES LLC; ARRIS ENTERPRISES LLC; ARRIS TECHNOLOGY, INC.; RUCKUS WIRELESS, INC.; ARRIS SOLUTIONS, INC.
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Reel/Frame 049905/0504 →
PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jul 3, 2019
From: ARRIS ENTERPRISES LLC
To: WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 049820/0495 →
ABL SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jul 3, 2019
From: COMMSCOPE, INC. OF NORTH CAROLINA; COMMSCOPE TECHNOLOGIES LLC; ARRIS ENTERPRISES LLC; ARRIS TECHNOLOGY, INC.; RUCKUS WIRELESS, INC.; ARRIS SOLUTIONS, INC.
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Reel/Frame 049892/0396 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Jul 2, 2019
From: ARRIS ENTERPRISES, INC.
To: ARRIS ENTERPRISES LLC
Reel/Frame 049649/0062 →
TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS Recorded Apr 8, 2019
From: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
To: ARRIS GROUP, INC.; ARRIS ENTERPRISES, INC.; ARRIS SOLUTIONS, INC.; ARRIS KOREA, INC.; ARRIS HOLDINGS CORP. OF ILLINOIS, INC.; BIG BAND NETWORKS, INC.; TEXSCAN CORPORATION; POWER GUARD, INC.; 4HOME, INC.; ACADIA AIC, INC.; AEROCAST, INC.; BROADBUS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; GENERAL INSTRUMENT CORPORATION; GENERAL INSTRUMENT AUTHORIZATION SERVICES, INC.; GENERAL INSTRUMENT INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS, INC.; IMEDIA CORPORATION; JERROLD DC RADIO, INC.; LEAPSTONE SYSTEMS, INC.; MODULUS VIDEO, INC.; MOTOROLA WIRELINE NETWORKS, INC.; NETOPIA, INC.; NEXTLEVEL SYSTEMS (PUERTO RICO), INC.; QUANTUM BRIDGE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.; SETJAM, INC.; SUNUP DESIGN SYSTEMS, INC.; UCENTRIC SYSTEMS, INC.; GIC INTERNATIONAL HOLDCO LLC; GIC INTERNATIONAL CAPITAL LLC; CCE SOFTWARE LLC; THE GI REALTY TRUST 1996
Reel/Frame 048825/0294 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 18, 2015
From: ARRIS TECHNOLOGY, INC
To: ARRIS ENTERPRISES, INC.
Reel/Frame 037328/0341 →
MERGER AND CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Mar 10, 2015
From: GENERAL INSTRUMENT CORPORATION; GENERAL INSTRUMENT CORPORATION
To: ARRIS TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Reel/Frame 035176/0620 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded May 28, 2013
From: ARRIS GROUP, INC.; ARRIS ENTERPRISES, INC.; ARRIS SOLUTIONS, INC.; ARRIS KOREA, INC.; ARRIS HOLDINGS CORP. OF ILLINOIS; BIGBAND NETWORKS, INC.; TEXSCAN CORPORATION; POWER GUARD, INC.; 4HOME, INC.; ACADIA AIC, INC.; AEROCAST, INC.; BROADBUS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; GENERAL INSTRUMENT CORPORATION; GENERAL INSTRUMENT AUTHORIZATION SERVICES, INC.; GENERAL INSTRUMENT INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS, INC.; IMEDIA CORPORATION; JERROLD DC RADIO, INC.; LEAPSTONE SYSTEMS, INC.; MODULUS VIDEO, INC.; MOTOROLA WIRELINE NETWORKS, INC.; NETOPIA, INC.; NEXTLEVEL SYSTEMS (PUERTO RICO), INC.; QUANTUM BRIDGE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.; SETJAM, INC.; SUNUP DESIGN SYSTEMS, INC.; UCENTRIC SYSTEMS, INC.; GIC INTERNATIONAL HOLDCO LLC; GIC INTERNATIONAL CAPITAL LLC; CCE SOFTWARE LLC; THE GI REALTY TRUST 1996
To: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Reel/Frame 030498/0023 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 18, 2011
From: THIBEAULT, BRIAN K.; COOPER, MICHAEL J.; MORRISSETTE, MARC L.
To: GENERAL INSTRUMENT CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 027254/0749 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20130128723A1 · May 23, 2013