IP Library Granted Patent US 8,433,810
Granted Patent B2
US 8,433,810 · App. 13/324,442 · Granted Apr 30, 2013

Probing-based auto moding

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,433,810
App. No.
13/324,442
Granted
Apr 30, 2013
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for selecting a mode of operation for at least two modems is described. First, a handshake procedure is performed in order to determine a set of possible modes of operation supported by said modems. From said set of possible modes of operation, a set of favorable modes of operation is derived. In case there exist two or more favorable modes of operation, a probing-based selection is performed that comprises evaluating respective performances of said favorable modes of operation. The favorable mode of operation with the best performance is selected as a resultant mode of operation.

Claims (38)

1. A method for selecting a resultant mode of operation for at least two modems that communicate via a communications network, comprising:

(a) determining a set of possible modes of operation supported by the at least two modems;

(b) selecting a first set of favorable modes of operation from among the set of possible modes of operation using a first level of priority-based selection based upon priorities assigned to a first criteria;

(c) selecting a second set of favorable modes of operation from among the first set of favorable modes of operation using a second level of priority-based selection based upon priorities assigned to a second criteria; and

(d) in case there exist two or more second favorable modes of operation from among said second set of favorable modes of operation, performing a probing-based selection by evaluating respective performances of each of the second favorable modes of operation to determine the resultant mode of operation.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein step (a) comprises:

(a)(i) performing a handshake procedure to determine the set of possible modes of operation supported by the at least two modems.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first criteria and the second criteria are annexes and protocol standards, respectively, that are supported by the at least two modems.

4. The method of claim 3 , wherein step (b) comprises:

(b)(i) selecting the first set of favorable modes of operation using the first level of priority-based selection based on priorities assigned to the annexes.

5. The method of claim 3 , wherein step (c) comprises:

(c)(i) selecting the second set of favorable modes of operation using the second level of priority-based selection based on priorities assigned to the protocol standards.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein step (d) comprises:

(d)(i) selecting a second favorable mode of operation with a best performance from among the second set of favorable modes as the resultant mode of operation.

7. The method of claim 6 , wherein step (d)(i) comprises:

(d)(i)(A) determining line conditions for each of the second favorable modes of operation.

8. The method of claim 7 , wherein step (d)(i) further comprises:

(d)(i)(B) deriving a performance index for each of the second favorable modes of operation from the line conditions; and

(d)(i)(C) selecting a second favorable mode of operation with a highest best performance index from among the second set of favorable modes as the resultant mode of operation.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein step (d)(i)(A) comprises:

(d)(i)(A)(1) determining a signal-to-noise ratio for each of the second favorable modes of operation to derive the performance index.

10. The method of claim 8 , wherein step (d)(i)(A) comprises:

(d)(i)(A)(1) determining an upstream bit rate and a downstream bit rate for each of the second favorable modes of operation to derive the performance index.

11. A modem unit for transmitting data via a communications network, comprising:

a transmission unit configured:

(i) to determine a set of possible modes of operation,

(ii) to derive a first set of favorable modes of operation from among the set of possible modes of operation using a first level of priority-based selection based on priorities assigned to a first criteria, and

(iii) to derive a second set of favorable modes of operation from among the first set of favorable modes of operation using a second level of priority-based selection based on priorities assigned to a second criteria; and

a probing facility configured to perform a probing-based selection that comprises evaluating respective performances of the second favorable modes of operation to determine a resultant mode of operation when two or more second favorable modes of operation exist.

12. The modem unit of claim 11 , wherein the transmission unit is further configured to perform a handshake procedure to determine the set of possible modes of operation.

13. The modern unit of claim 11 , wherein the first criteria and the second criteria are annexes and protocol standards, respectively, that are supported by at least the modem unit.

14. The modem unit of claim 13 , wherein the transmission unit is further configured to derive the first set of favorable modes of operation using the first level of priority-based selection based on priorities assigned to the annexes.

15. The modem unit of claim 13 , wherein the transmission unit is further configured to derive the second set of favorable modes of operation using the second level of priority-based selection based on priorities assigned to the protocol standards.

16. The modem unit of claim 11 , wherein the probing facility is further configured to select a second favorable mode of operation with a best performance from among the second set of favorable modes as the resultant mode of operation.

17. The modem unit of claim 16 , wherein the probing facility is further configured to determine line conditions for each of the second favorable modes of operation.

18. The modem unit of claim 17 , wherein the probing facility is further configured to derive a performance index for each of the second favorable modes of operation from the line conditions, and to select a second favorable mode of operation with a highest best performance index from among the second set of favorable modes as the resultant mode of operation.

19. The modem unit of claim 18 , wherein the probing facility is further configured to determine a signal-to-noise ratio for each of the second favorable modes of operation to derive the performance index.

20. The modem unit of claim 18 , wherein the probing facility is further configured to determine an upstream bit rate and a downstream bit rate for each of the second favorable modes of operation to derive the performance index.

Assignments (6)
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF MERGER TO 09/05/2018 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 047230 FRAME: 0133. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE MERGER. Recorded Oct 29, 2018
From: AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES GENERAL IP (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.
To: AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL SALES PTE. LIMITED
Reel/Frame 047630/0456 →
MERGER Recorded Oct 4, 2018
From: AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES GENERAL IP (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.
To: AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL SALES PTE. LIMITED
Reel/Frame 047230/0133 →
TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS Recorded Feb 3, 2017
From: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: BROADCOM CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 041712/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 1, 2017
From: BROADCOM CORPORATION
To: AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES GENERAL IP (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.
Reel/Frame 041706/0001 →
PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Feb 11, 2016
From: BROADCOM CORPORATION
To: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 037806/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 13, 2011
From: PEETERS, MIGUEL; CASSIERS, RAPHAEL; CHRISTIAENS, BENOIT; LYSENS, RUBEN; VAN DE WIEL, OLIVIER
To: BROADCOM CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 027377/0859 →