Granted Patent B2

US 9,043,187 · App. 13/333,313 · Granted May 26, 2015

Abstract

Claims (50)

1. A computer method of material modeling for crash test dummy finite element models, said method comprising the steps of:

providing a computer;

making an initial range for a relative volume (J) for a material of a crash test dummy component using the computer;

checking lower and upper bounds of the initial range for the relative volume (J) against predetermined values using the computer;

calculating a strain work of the material based on the relative volume (J) using the computer;

evaluating the strain work based on the relative volume (J) using the computer;

calculating a work error of the strain work based on the relative volume (J) using the computer;

determining whether the work error is less than a first predetermined tolerance using the computer;

outputting the relative volume (J) if the work error is less than the first predetermined tolerance using the computer;

making a material card for the material of the crash test dummy component with the outputted relative volume (J) using the computer;

providing a finite element model for the crash test dummy component using the computer;

applying the material card in the finite element model to validate the finite element model using the computer;

determining whether the finite element model is acceptable;

ending the method if the finite element model is acceptable; and

adjusting a value for the relative volume (J) for the material card to make the material soft or stiff if the finite element model is not acceptable.

2. The computer method as set forth in claim 1 including the step of inputting quasi-static compression test data for the material to be modeled.

3. The computer method as set forth in claim 2 including the step of integrating a test curve for the material to obtain a work-strain curve.

4. The computer method as set forth in claim 3 including the step of choosing predetermined variables, making an initial range for the variables, and checking lower and upper bounds for the variables.

5. The computer method as set forth in claim 4 including the step of outputting the predetermined variables if the work error is less than the first predetermined tolerance.

6. The computer method as set forth in claim 1 including the step of making multiple trial vectors if the work error is not less than the first predetermined tolerance.

7. The computer method as set forth in claim 1 including the step of inputting stress relaxation test data of the material, calculating a stress relaxation test curve, and picking characteristic points from the stress relaxation test curve.

8. The computer method as set forth in claim 7 including the step of choosing predetermined variables, making an initial range for the variables, and checking lower and upper bounds for the variables.

9. The computer method as set forth in claim 8 including the step of evaluating a stress of the material against test stress of the material.

10. The computer method as set forth in claim 9 including the step of calculating a stress error of the material.

11. The computer method as set forth in claim 10 including the step of determining whether the stress error is less than a predetermined tolerance.

12. The computer method as set forth in claim 11 including the step of outputting the predetermined variables if the stress error is less than the predetermined tolerance.

13. The computer method as set forth in claim 11 including the step of making multiple trial vectors if the stress error is not less than the predetermined tolerance.

14. A computer method of material modeling for crash test dummy finite element models, said method comprising the steps of:

providing a computer;

inputting quasi-static compression test data for a material of a crash test dummy component to be modeled using the computer;

integrating a test curve for the material to obtain a work-strain curve;

choosing first predetermined variables including a relative volume (J) for the material, making an initial range for the first predetermined variables, and checking lower and upper bounds for the first predetermined variables using the computer;

calculating a strain work of the material based on the first predetermined variables using the computer;

evaluating the strain work based on the first predetermined variables using the computer;

calculating a work error of the strain work based on the first predetermined variables using the computer;

determining whether the work error is less than a first predetermined tolerance using the computer;

outputting the first predetermined variables if the work error is less than the first predetermined tolerance using the computer;

making multiple trial vectors if the work error is not less than the first predetermined tolerance using the computer;

inputting stress relaxation test data of the material, calculating a stress relaxation test curve, and picking characteristic points from the stress relaxation test curve;

choosing second predetermined variables, making an initial range for the second predetermined variables, and checking lower and upper bounds for the second predetermined variables using the computer;

evaluating a stress of the material against test stress of the material using the computer;

determining whether a stress error of the material is less than a second predetermined tolerance using the computer;

outputting the second predetermined variables if the stress error is less than the second predetermined tolerance using the computer;

making multiple trial vectors if the stress error is not less than the second predetermined tolerance using the computer;

making a material card for the material of the crash test dummy component from the outputted second predetermined variables using the computer;

providing a finite element model for the crash test dummy component suing using the computer;

applying the material card in the finite element model to validate the finite element model using the computer;

determining whether the finite element model is acceptable;

ending the method if the finite element model is acceptable; and

adjusting the material card to make the material soft or stiff if the finite element model is not acceptable.

Assignments (12)