IP Library Granted Patent US 8,653,986
Granted Patent B2
US 8,653,986 · App. 13/334,132 · Granted Feb 18, 2014

Traffic information system

Inventors: Asaf Tamir (Rechovot, IL); Ido Topaz (Tel-Aviv, IL)
Assignee: Insurance Services Office, Inc.
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,653,986
App. No.
13/334,132
Granted
Feb 18, 2014
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method of evaluating the driving behavior in a vehicle. The method includes determining values of a plurality of parameters of the operation of a first vehicle in a first road segment, determining values of the plurality of parameters for one or more second vehicles in a second road segment having similar properties to those of the first road segment, comparing the determined values of the first vehicle and the one or more second vehicles and providing an evaluation of the driving behavior of the first vehicle, responsive to the comparison.

Claims (91)

1. A method of analyzing the driving behavior of a driver or a vehicle, the method comprising:

monitoring the driving behavior of a driver or a vehicle in a plurality of structurally similar road portions; and

determining a score for the driver or vehicle in said structurally similar road portions;

wherein said determining a score comprises one of:

(a) comparing the driving behavior of the driver or vehicle to driving behaviors of other drivers or vehicles in said structurally similar road portions; and

(b) comparing the driving behavior of the driver or vehicle to prior driving behavior of the driver or vehicle in said structurally similar road portions.

2. A method according to claim 1 , wherein determining a score comprises analyzing the percentage of said road portions passed properly by the driver according to predefined thresholds.

3. A method according to claim 2 , wherein said predefined thresholds are dynamic thresholds.

4. A method according to claim 1 , wherein said structurally similar road portions comprise curves.

5. A method according to claim 1 , wherein said structurally similar road portions comprise intersections.

6. A method according to claim 1 , wherein said structurally similar road portions comprise road bumps.

7. A method according to claim 1 , wherein said structurally similar road portions comprise traffic lights.

8. A method according to claim 1 , wherein said structurally similar road portions comprise road portions having a similar traffic sign.

9. A method according to claim 1 , wherein said structurally similar road portions comprise highways.

10. A method according to claim 1 , wherein said structurally similar road portions comprise city roads.

11. A method according to claim 1 , wherein said structurally similar road portions comprise rural roads.

12. A method according to claim 1 , further comprising:

calculating insurance rates for said vehicle based on said score.

13. A method according to claim 12 , wherein said calculating is based on additional parameters.

14. A method according to claim 1 , further comprising:

calculating a discount on insurance rates for said vehicle based on said score.

15. A method according to claim 14 , wherein said calculating is based on additional parameters.

16. A method according to claim 1 , further comprising:

generating a warning to the driver based on said score.

17. A method according to claim 16 , further comprising, providing said warning remote from the vehicle.

18. A method according to claim 1 , wherein determining a score comprises: comparing the driving behavior of the driver or vehicle to driving behaviors of other drivers or vehicles in said structurally similar road portions.

19. A method according to claim 1 , further comprising:

updating the score based on continuous monitoring of the driver or vehicle in said structurally similar road portions.

20. A method according to claim 1 , wherein said determining a score for the driver or vehicle in said structurally similar road portions comprises determining a plurality of scores for the driver or vehicle in said structurally similar road portions.

21. A method of analyzing the driving behavior of driver or a vehicle, the method comprising:

monitoring the behavior of a driver or a vehicle in a plurality of similar driving events; and

determining a score for the vehicle for said similar driving events;

wherein said determining a score comprises one of:

(a) comparing the driving behavior of the driver or vehicle to driving behaviors of other drivers or vehicles in said similar driving events; and

(b) comparing the driving behavior of the driver or vehicle to prior driving behavior of the driver or vehicle in said similar driving events.

22. A method according to claim 21 , wherein determining a score comprises analyzing a percentage of said driving events performed properly further comprises according to predefined thresholds.

23. A method according to claim 22 , wherein said predefined thresholds are dynamic thresholds.

24. A method according to claim 21 , wherein said driving events comprise braking events.

25. A method according to claim 21 , wherein said driving events comprise changing lanes.

26. A method according to claim 21 , wherein said driving events comprise distance keeping.

27. A method according to claim 21 , wherein said driving events comprise abrupt changes in speed.

28. A method according to claim 21 , wherein said driving events comprise performing U-turns.

29. A method according to claim 21 , wherein said driving events comprise reverse driving.

30. A method according to claim 21 , wherein said driving events comprise slowing down towards dangerous road segments.

31. A method according to claim 21 , further comprising:

calculating an insurance rate for said vehicle based on said determined score.

32. A method according to claim 31 , wherein said calculating is based on additional parameters.

33. A method according to claim 21 , further comprising:

calculating a discount on insurance rates for said vehicle based on said determined score.

34. A method according to claim 33 , wherein said calculating is based on additional parameters.

35. A method according to claim 21 , further comprising:

generating a warning to the driver based on said determined score.

36. A method according to claim 35 , further comprising, providing said warning remote from the vehicle.

37. A method according to claim 21 , wherein determining a score comprises: comparing the driving behavior of the driver or vehicle to driving behaviors of other drivers or vehicles in said similar driving events.

38. A method according to claim 21 , further comprising:

updating the score based on continuous monitoring of the driver or vehicle in said similar driving events.

39. A method according to claim 21 , wherein determining a score for the vehicle for said driving events comprises determining a plurality of scores for the vehicle for said driving events.

40. A method of analyzing the driving behavior of driver or a vehicle, the method comprising:

monitoring the behavior of a driver or a vehicle in a plurality of similar times; and

determining a score for the driver or vehicle for said similar times;

wherein said determining comprises one of:

(a) comparing the driving behavior of the driver or vehicle to driving behaviors of other drivers or vehicles during said similar driving times; and

(b) comparing the driving behavior of the driver or vehicle to prior driving behavior of the driver or vehicle in said similar driving times.

41. A method according to claim 40 , wherein determining a score comprises analyzing the behavior of the vehicle according to predefined thresholds.

42. A method according to claim 41 , wherein said predefined thresholds are dynamic thresholds.

43. A method according to claim 40 , wherein said similar times comprise a similar time of day.

44. A method according to claim 40 , wherein said similar times comprise similar weather conditions.

45. A method according to claim 40 , wherein said similar times comprise rush hours.

46. A method according to claim 40 , wherein said similar times comprise similar dates.

47. A method according to claim 40 , wherein said similar times comprise whether it is light or dark outside.

48. A method according to claim 40 , wherein said similar times comprise similar types of days.

49. A method according to claim 48 , wherein said type of days comprise work days.

50. A method according to claim 48 , wherein said type of days comprise holidays.

51. A method according to claim 48 , wherein said type of days comprise week-ends.

52. A method according to claim 40 , further comprising:

calculating an insurance rate for said vehicle based on said determined score.

53. A method according to claim 52 , wherein said calculating is based on additional parameters.

54. A method according to claim 40 , further comprising:

calculating a discount on insurance rates for said vehicle based on said determined score.

55. A method according to claim 54 , wherein said calculating is based on additional parameters.

56. A method according to claim 40 , further comprising:

generating a warning to the driver based on said determined score.

57. A method according to claim 56 , further comprising, providing said warning remote from the vehicle.

58. A method according to claim 40 , wherein said predefined thresholds are dynamic thresholds.

59. A method according to claim 40 , wherein determining a score comprises: comparing the driving behavior of the driver or vehicle to driving behaviors of other drivers or vehicles during said similar times.

60. A method according to claim 40 , further comprising:

updating the score based on continuous monitoring of the driver or vehicle during said similar times.

61. A method according to claim 40 , wherein determining a score for the driver or vehicle for said times comprises determining a plurality of scores for the driver or vehicle for said times.

62. A method according to claim 1 , wherein said monitoring includes measuring values related to operation of the vehicle; and

wherein said determining a score includes discarding a percentage of said measured values.

63. A method according to claim 62 , wherein said determining a score includes discarding at least one of consecutive measurements having similar values, low values, values having low accuracy, accelerometer values beneath about 5 dB, acceleration values that do not affect vehicle speed, acceleration values that occur in the same location for nearly all vehicles.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 5, 2013
From: SENSOMATIX LTD.
To: INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC.
Reel/Frame 030550/0443 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 8, 2012
From: TAMIR, ASAF; TOPAZ, IDO
To: SENSOMATIX LTD.
Reel/Frame 028009/0730 →
Continuity (4)
Continuation 12876182 · Sep 6, 2010
Continuation 10563703
Provisional Application 60484667 · Jul 7, 2003
Related Publication 20120089423A1 · Apr 12, 2012