IP Library Granted Patent US 8,868,391
Granted Patent B2
US 8,868,391 · App. 13/375,973 · Granted Oct 21, 2014

Process for characterising the evolution of an oil or gas reservoir over time

Inventor: Andrea Grandi (Sola, NO)
Assignee: Total S.A.
G01V1/30
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,868,391
App. No.
13/375,973
Granted
Oct 21, 2014
Kind
B2
Abstract

Disclosed is a process for characterising the evolution of a reservoir over a time lapse comprising the steps of: providing a base and a plurality of monitor surveys of the reservoir, each having a set of seismic traces at different times; deriving an optimal regularization weight-map from a combination of at least three surveys; and using the optimal regularization weights to invert and obtain an improved time lapse seismic image between pairs of seismic surveys.

Claims (164)

1. A process for characterising evolution of a reservoir over a time lapse by analyzing changes of seismic data wherein n surveys of the reservoir exist, where n>2, each survey of the n surveys having been taken at a different time within said time lapse and comprising a set of seismic traces, the process comprising:

inverting, via a computer, one or more seismic traces for each of the set of seismic traces from multiple survey pairs taken from the n surveys to obtain an estimate of the changes having occurred in the time lapsed between surveys of each survey pair, said inversion being performed by minimising an ill-posed function which includes at least one regularisation term to impose constraints on inverted parameters, the regularization term comprising a regularization weight;

repeating, via a computer, the inverting for a plurality of regularisation weights;

determining, via a computer, mismatches of terms of the ill-posed function in terms of a regularisation weight of the plurality of regularisation weights; and

using the determined mismatches to determine an optimal regularisation weight for the at least one regularisation term that represents a best compromise between modelling the changes and imposing the constraints.

2. The process according to claim 1 wherein said function to be minimised is dependent on relative velocity changes, said function modelling time shifts in a seismic response of reflectors and associated changes in reflectivity between surveys of each survey pair.

3. The process according to claim 1 wherein said ill-posed function is defined as:

C

=

b

_

-

m

_

1

2

2

+

b

_

-

m

_

2

2

2

+

m

_

1

-

m

_

2

2

2

+

b

_

-

m

_

3

2

2

+

m

_

1

-

m

_

3

2

2

+

m

_

2

-

m

_

3

2

2

+

and said at least one regularisation term; and

where b is a base seismic trace from a first of said n surveys, and m n are subsequent traces from subsequent ones of said n surveys on which a shaping operator has been applied to compensate for time shift and 4D amplitude effects in order to match the base seismic trace.

4. The process according to claim 3 wherein a regularisation term occurring for each pair of surveys is added to the ill-posed function and thus minimised during inversion.

5. The process according to claim 3 wherein terms of the ill-posed function are weighted differently.

6. The process according to claim 3 wherein the ill-posed function is computed with a window restricted to contain a majority of 4D effects.

7. The process according to claim 1 wherein said inversion is carried out for interval time shift (time strain).

8. The process according to claim 7 wherein said ill-posed function is defined as:

C

=

b

_

-

m

_

1

2

2

+

b

_

-

m

_

2

2

2

+

m

_

1

-

m

_

2

2

2

+

b

_

-

m

_

3

2

2

+

m

_

1

-

m

_

3

2

2

+

m

_

2

-

m

_

3

2

2

+

and said at least one regularisation term; and

where b is a base seismic trace from a first of said n surveys, and m n are subsequent traces from subsequent ones of said n surveys on which a shaping operator has been applied to compensate for time shift in order to match the base seismic trace.

9. The process according to claim 8 wherein terms of the ill-posed function are weighted differently.

10. The process as claimed in claim 1 further comprising the step of using resultant data to aid hydrocarbon recovery from said reservoir.

11. A computer program residing on a non-transitory computer-readable medium, comprising computer program code means adapted to run on a computer all the steps of the process of claim 1 .

12. Apparatus specifically adapted to carry out all the steps of the process of claim 1 .

Assignments (3)
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE NAME OF THE ASSIGNEE PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 67096 FRAME: 87. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT. Recorded Jun 26, 2024
From: TOTALENERGIES SE (PREVIOUSLY TOTAL SA THEN TOTAL SE)
To: TOTALENERGIES ONETECH
Reel/Frame 068051/0530 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 12, 2024
From: TOTALENERGIES SE (PREVIOUSLY TOTAL SA THEN TOTAL SE)
To: TOTALENERGIES ONETECH (PREVIOUSLY TOTALENERGIES ONE TECH)
Reel/Frame 067096/0087 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 29, 2012
From: GRANDI, ANDREA
To: TOTAL S.A.
Reel/Frame 027779/0847 →
Priority Claims (1)
GB 0909599.3 · Jun 4, 2009 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20120158382A1 · Jun 21, 2012