IP Library Patent Application 13436212
Patent Application
App. No. 13/436,212

SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS OF MOBILE NETWORK PERFORMANCE PROBLEMS

Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US None
App. No.
13/436,212
Abstract

A method and system for identifying causes of performance metric changes in a network by selecting, from a pool of network event counters, a plurality of candidate counters relevant to a performance metric; grouping the candidate counters into clusters of similar counters; selecting, from each cluster, one or more representative counters; and fitting the selected representative counters to a model of the performance metric to determine thereby a set of representative counters most relevant to the performance metric.

Claims (40)

1 . A method for identifying causes of performance metric changes in a network, the method comprising:

selecting, from a pool of network event counters, a plurality of candidate counters relevant to a performance metric;

grouping candidate counters into clusters of similar counters;

selecting, from each cluster, one or more representative counters; and

fitting the selected representative counters to a model of the performance metric to determine thereby a set of representative counters most relevant to the performance metric.

2 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising normalizing the values of said selected plurality of candidate counters.

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein selecting the plurality of candidate counters comprises:

determining for each event counter a respective importance score for the performance metric; and

selecting as candidate counters for the performance metric those event counters having a respective importance score above a threshold level.

4 . The method of claim 3 , wherein said importance score is determined according to a rank correlation.

5 . The method of claim 4 , wherein said rank correlation comprises a Pearson correlation.

6 . The method of claim 3 , wherein said importance score is determined according to a Komogorov-Smirnov (KS) test.

7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein grouping the candidate counters into the clusters comprises:

computing a correlation between pairs of candidate counters to provide a plurality of nodes, wherein node edges are defined when an absolute value of a respective correlation exceeds a threshold level.

8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein said one or more representative counters comprises a single candidate counter having the largest correlation to the performance metric.

9 . The method of claim 1 , wherein said one or more representative counters comprises a predefined number of candidate counters having the largest correlation to the performance metric.

10 . The method of claim 1 , wherein said one or more representative counters comprises a set of candidate counters having a correlation to the performance metric above a threshold level.

11 . The method of claim 1 , wherein said fitting uses a regression analysis.

12 . The method of claim 1 , wherein said fitting uses a classification tree.

13 . The method of claim 1 , wherein said fitting uses a classification/regression tree adapted in accordance with a boosting procedure.

14 . The method of claim 13 , wherein said boosting procedure comprises an AdaBoost method.

15 . The method of claim 1 , wherein of said method is repeated for each of a plurality of performance metrics.

16 . The method of claim 1 , wherein said grouping is performed using one or more statistical clustering techniques.

17 . The method of claim 16 , wherein said statistical clustering techniques comprise any of a spectral clustering technique, a hierarchical clustering technique and a cost tree analysis technique.

18 . An apparatus for use in a network management system and for identifying causes of performance metric changes in a network, the apparatus comprising:

a processor configured to:

select, from a pool of network event counters, a plurality of candidate counters relevant to a performance metric;

group candidate counters into clusters of similar counters;

select, from each cluster, one or more representative counters; and

fit the selected representative counters to a model of the performance metric to determine thereby a set of representative counters most relevant to the performance metric.

19 . A tangible and non-transitory computer readable medium including software instructions which, when executed by a processer, perform a method for identifying causes of performance metric changes in a network, the method comprising:

selecting, from a pool of network event counters, a plurality of candidate counters relevant to a performance metric;

grouping candidate counters into clusters of similar counters;

selecting, from each cluster, one or more representative counters; and

fitting the selected representative counters to a model of the performance metric to determine thereby a set of representative counters most relevant to the performance metric.

20 . A computer program product, wherein computer instructions, when executed by a processor in a computer, perform a method for identifying causes of performance metric changes in a network, the method comprising:

selecting, from a pool of network event counters, a plurality of candidate counters relevant to a performance metric;

grouping candidate counters into clusters of similar counters;

selecting, from each cluster, one or more representative counters; and

fitting the selected representative counters to a model of the performance metric to determine thereby a set of representative counters most relevant to the performance metric.

Assignments (4)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Oct 9, 2014
From: CREDIT SUISSE AG
To: ALCATEL-LUCENT USA INC.
Reel/Frame 033949/0016 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 19, 2013
From: ALCATEL-LUCENT USA INC.
To: ALCATEL LUCENT
Reel/Frame 030252/0022 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Mar 7, 2013
From: ALCATEL-LUCENT USA INC.
To: CREDIT SUISSE AG
Reel/Frame 030510/0627 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 18, 2012
From: CAO, JIN; LI, LI ERRAN; BU, TIAN; SANDERS, SUSAN WU
To: ALCATEL-LUCENT USA INC.
Reel/Frame 028064/0495 →