IP Library Granted Patent US 8,548,833
Granted Patent B2
US 8,548,833 · App. 13/458,456 · Granted Oct 1, 2013

Insurance product, rating system and method

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,548,833
App. No.
13/458,456
Granted
Oct 1, 2013
Kind
B2
Abstract

In the present invention, an insurance product, rating system and method generally relates to a rating and pricing system for quantifying the risk that the annual savings will not fall below specified levels associated with implementing and maintaining economic improvements. The product, system and method can be applied to various industries, including, power generation, petro-chemical, manufacturing and refining facilities. Various embodiments disclosed herein relate to systems and methods for determining optimal risk acceptance values associated with implementing an economic improvement plan for a facility.

Claims (24)

1. A computer implemented method for underwriting an insurance policy for insuring an insured's projected savings from an improvement program by using a computer system having a computer processor specifically programmed to perform the method, the method comprising:

accessing, using the computer processor, aggregate risk distribution data corresponding to projected savings from implementing the improvement plan;

selecting, using the computer processor, a confidence level for the insurance policy;

determining, using the computer processor, a risk acceptance value based on the aggregate savings risk distribution data and the confidence level;

calculating, using the computer processor, a loss cost component for the insurance policy based on the risk acceptance value and the aggregate risk distribution data; and

generating, using the computer processor, the insurance policy based on the improvement plan, the risk acceptance value, and the loss cost component for the insurance policy.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

calculating, using the computer processor, a rate-on-line loss cost requirement for the insurance policy;

determining, using the computer processor, an overall loss cost component based on the loss cost component and the rate-on-line loss cost requirement; and

calculating, using the computer processor, an adjusted premium for the insurance policy by applying underwriting and engineering expenses to the overall loss cost component of an insured; and

wherein underwriting the insurance policy is based on the improvement plan, the risk acceptance value, and the adjusted premium for the insurance policy.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the improvement plan comprises at least one of engineering initiatives, work force reassignment initiatives, process re-design initiatives, production efficiency initiatives, installation of advanced process controls initiatives, and energy efficiency capital project initiatives.

4. The method of claim 3 , wherein the improvement plan is agreed to by an insurer and an insured.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the improvement plan further comprises a schedule for implementing initiatives of the improvement plan, verification procedures, and the projected savings associated with implementing initiatives of the improvement plan.

6. The method of claim 1 , further comprising selecting, using the computer processor, a measurement method from a group consisting of an escrow measurement method and a no-escrow measurement method.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the confidence level is based on a probability that an annual savings will exceed an insured floor value.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the improvement plan pertains to an industry.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein the industry is a power generation industry.

10. The method of claim 8 , wherein the industry is a chemical industry.

11. The method of claim 8 , wherein the industry is a refining industry.

12. The method of claim 8 , wherein the industry is a manufacturing industry.

13. The method of claim 1 , wherein the confidence level is independently selected for specific time periods from the insurance policy's full term.

14. The method of claim 13 , wherein the time period for which an independent confidence level is selected is a range from one year to the insurance policy's full term.

15. The method of claim 1 , wherein the confidence level is greater than 90 percent.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 20, 2013
From: HSB SOLOMON ASSOCIATES, LLC
To: HARTFORD STEAM BOILER INSPECTION AND INSURANCE COMPANY
Reel/Frame 030448/0170 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 9, 2012
From: JONES, RICHARD B.; BARATS, GREGORY M.
To: HSB SOLOMON ASSOCIATES, LLC
Reel/Frame 028755/0893 →