IP Library Granted Patent US 8,811,516
Granted Patent B2
US 8,811,516 · App. 13/502,858 · Granted Aug 19, 2014

Channel feedback to support efficient rank override

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,811,516
App. No.
13/502,858
Granted
Aug 19, 2014
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method can include providing channel feedback to support efficient rank override For example, in such a method, a rank−r precoder index corresponding to a rank−r precoder is determined, and performance for each rank−1 precoder within the rank−r precoder is measured Based on the measured performance, a rank−1 precoder that maximizes performance is selected.

Claims (39)

1. A method, comprising:

determining a rank−r precoder that optimizes performance and reporting an associated rank−r precoder index to a network node;

determining a rank−1 precoder that optimizes performance and reporting an associated rank−1 precoder index to the network node;

wherein the rank−r precoder is determined by a search restricted to a precoder group defined by the rank−1 precoder index; and

the rank−r precoder index is signaled with less than ceil(log 2(rank−r codebook size)) bits.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

reporting at least one quality indicator indicating a difference in a channel quality between the rank−1 precoder index and the rank−r precoder index to the network node.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the rank−1 precoder is signaled with ceil(log 2(rank−1 codebook size) bits.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the signaling is performed over a physical uplink control channel or a physical uplink shared channel.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the optimizing of performance comprises maximizing an expected throughput optimally or minimizing a chordal distance suboptimally.

6. An apparatus, comprising:

at least one processor; and

at least one memory including computer program code,

the at least one memory and the computer program code are configured, with the at least one processor, to cause the apparatus at least to

determine a rank−r precoder that optimizes performance and reporting an associated rank−r precoder index to a network node;

determine a rank−1 precoder that optimizes performance and reporting an associated rank−1 precoder index to the network node;

wherein the rank−r precoder is determined by a search restricted to a precoder group defined by the rank−1 precoder index; and

the rank−r precoder index is signaled with less than ceil(log 2(rank−r codebook size)) bits.

7. The apparatus of claim 6 , the at least one memory and the computer program code are further configured, with the at least one processor, to cause the apparatus at least to

report at least one quality indicator indicating a difference in a channel quality between the rank−1 precoder index and the rank−r precoder index to the network node.

8. The apparatus of claim 6 , wherein the rank−1 precoder is signaled with ceil(log 2(rank−1 codebook size) bits.

9. The apparatus of claim 6 , wherein the signaling is performed over a physical uplink control channel or a physical uplink shared channel.

10. The apparatus of claim 6 , wherein the optimizing of performance comprises maximizing an expected throughput optimally or minimizing a chordal distance suboptimally.

11. An apparatus, comprising:

at least one processor; and

at least one memory including computer program code,

the at least one memory and the computer program code are configured, with the at least one processor, to cause the apparatus at least to

determine a rank−r precoder that optimizes performance and reporting an associated rank−r precoder index to a network node;

determine a rank−1 precoder that optimizes performance and reporting an associated rank−1 precoder index to the network node;

and report at least one rank−r quality indicator to the network node;

wherein the rank−1 precoder index indicates a combining vector for a subset of columns of the rank−r precoder having a best rank−r quality indicator.

12. The apparatus of claim 11 , wherein the at least one quality indicator indicates a difference in a channel quality between the rank−1 precoder index and the rank−r precoder index.

13. The apparatus of claim 11 , wherein the rank−r precoder is signaled with ceil(rank−r codebook size) bits.

14. The apparatus of claim 11 , wherein the optimizing of performance comprises maximizing an expected throughput optimally or minimizing a chordal distance suboptimally.

15. The apparatus of claim 11 , wherein the rank−1 precoder index is signaled with less than ceil(log 2(rank−1 codebook size)) bits.

16. The apparatus of claim 11 , the at least one memory and the computer program code are further configured, with the at least one processor, to cause the apparatus at least to

determine a rank<r precoder that optimizes performance and reporting an associated rank<r precoder index to the network node wherein the rank<r precoder index indicates a combining vector.

17. The apparatus of claim 16 , the at least one memory and the computer program code are further configured, with the at least one processor, to cause the apparatus at least

report for each of a plurality of codewords a second quality indicator indicating a difference in a channel quality between the rank<r precoder index and the rank−r precoder index to the network node.

Assignments (9)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jun 3, 2021
From: TERRIER SSC, LLC
To: WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC
Reel/Frame 056526/0093 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jun 1, 2021
From: WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC
To: OT WSOU TERRIER HOLDINGS, LLC
Reel/Frame 056990/0081 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded May 21, 2019
From: OCO OPPORTUNITIES MASTER FUND, L.P. (F/K/A OMEGA CREDIT OPPORTUNITIES MASTER FUND LP
To: WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC
Reel/Frame 049246/0405 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded May 20, 2019
From: WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC
To: BP FUNDING TRUST, SERIES SPL-VI
Reel/Frame 049235/0068 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 25, 2017
From: NOKIA TECHNOLOGIES OY
To: WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC
Reel/Frame 043953/0822 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Sep 21, 2017
From: WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC
To: OMEGA CREDIT OPPORTUNITIES MASTER FUND, LP
Reel/Frame 043966/0574 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 28, 2015
From: NOKIA CORPORATION
To: NOKIA TECHNOLOGIES OY
Reel/Frame 035512/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 8, 2012
From: KOIVISTO, TOMMI TAPANI; ROMAN, TIMO ERIC; ENESCU, MIHAI HORATIU; SCHOBER, KAROL
To: NOKIA CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 028168/0708 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 30, 2012
From: KOIVISTO, TOMMI TAPANI; ROMAN, TIMO ERIC; ENESCU, MIHAI HORATIU; SCHOBER, KAROL
To: NOKIA CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 028130/0896 →