IP Library Granted Patent US 9,220,510
Granted Patent B2
US 9,220,510 · App. 13/524,424 · Granted Dec 29, 2015

System and method for bone preparation for an implant

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,220,510
App. No.
13/524,424
Granted
Dec 29, 2015
Kind
B2
Abstract

A computer assisted surgical system for guiding bone cutting operations of an arthroplasty surgery is provided. The computer assisted surgical system includes a cutting guide having a guiding surface for mounting to a bone and a computer. The computer is in communication with the cutting guide and configured to generate a bone model of the first bone without the use of pre-operative bone images, determine a position of an implant model having a bone interface surface on the bone model, determine a position of the cutting guide on the first bone based on the determined position of the implant model on the bone model, and position the guiding surface of the cutting guide to one of a plurality of predetermined cut configurations relative to the bone interface surface.

Claims (53)

1. A computer assisted surgical system for guiding bone cutting operations of an arthroplasty surgery comprising:

a cutting guide to be positioned relative to a first bone; and

a computer operatively associated with a memory storing a plurality of predetermined cut configurations corresponding to various degrees of interference fit of an implant on the first bone, and wherein the computer is operatively in communication with the cutting guide and configured to intra-operatively position the cutting guide to one of the plurality of predetermined cut configurations.

2. The system of claim 1 , wherein the cutting guide is an autonomous or haptic robotic cutting guide.

3. The system of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of predetermined cut configurations is relative to a bone interface surface of the implant.

4. The system of claim 1 , wherein the computer further includes a set of instructions stored in the memory and executable by a processor to

generate a bone model of the first bone without the use of pre-operative bone images,

determine an optimum position of an implant model having a bone interface surface on the bone model, and

determine a position of the cutting guide relative to the first bone based on the determined position of the implant model on the bone model.

5. The system of claim 1 , wherein the computer further includes a set of instructions stored in the memory and executable by a processor to intra-operatively receive a selection of one of the plurality of predetermined cut configurations and position the cutting guide to a position corresponding to the selected predetermined cut configuration.

6. The system of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of predetermined cut configurations is a plurality of predetermined planes parallel to or at an angle relative to a bone interface surface of the implant.

7. The system of claim 6 , wherein the plurality of predetermined planes parallel to the bone interface surface is co-planar to the bone interface surface to provide a congruency fit or the plurality of predetermined planes is offset from the bone interface surface to provide an interference fit.

8. The system of claim 1 , further comprising a display for displaying the plurality of predetermined cut configurations.

9. The system of claim 8 , wherein the computer is further configured to display planned resection contours corresponding to one of the plurality of predetermined cut configurations on the display.

10. The system of claim 8 , wherein the display includes a representation of a degree of interference between the implant model and bone model.

11. The system of claim 10 , wherein the representation is a color map and various colors of the color map are representative of varying degrees of interference fit.

12. The system of claim 8 , wherein the computer further includes a set of instructions stored in the memory and executable by a processor to allow a user to intra-operatively select one of the plurality of predetermined cut configurations displayed on the display.

13. The system of claim 1 , wherein the computer further includes a set of instructions stored in the memory and executable by a processor to allow a user to align the cutting guide to another one of the plurality of predetermined cut configurations after an initial cut of the first bone.

14. A method of preparing a bone for an implant during an arthroplasty using a computer assisted surgery system operatively associated with a memory storing a plurality of predetermined cut configurations comprising the steps of:

intra-operatively selecting a degree of interference fit between an implant and a bone that corresponds to one of the plurality of predetermined cut configurations; and

using the computer assisted surgery system to position a robotic guide to one of the plurality of predetermined cut configurations corresponding to the selected degree of interference.

15. The method of claim 14 , wherein the computer assisted surgery system includes a set of instructions stored in the memory and executable by a processor to:

generate a bone model of a bone and an implant model having a bone interface;

determine an optimum position of the implant model on the bone model, and

position the robotic guide relative to the bone based on the determined optimum position.

16. The method of claim 14 , wherein selecting the degree of interference fit between the implant and bone is based on an intra-operative evaluation of a quality of the bone.

17. The method of claim 14 , further comprising the steps of:

resecting the bone at a plane corresponding to the positioned robotic guide;

intra-operatively evaluating a quality of the resected bone; and

selecting another degree of interference fit between the implant model and the bone model based on the intra-operative evaluation of the resected bone.

18. The method of claim 15 , wherein the bone model is generated without the use of pre-operative bone images.

19. The method of claim 15 , wherein the computer assisted surgical system is operatively in communication with and operably connected to the robotic guide.

20. A method of preparing a first bone for an implant during an arthroplasty using a computer assisted surgery system having a memory storing a set of default user preferences for resecting bone that corresponds to an interference fit of a prosthesis on the first bone comprising the steps of:

intra-operatively positioning a cutting guide operatively in communication with the computer assisted surgery system relative to the first bone;

aligning the cutting guide to correspond to the default user preferences for resecting bone; and

intra-operatively evaluating a quality of the first bone; and

determining if a repositioning of the cutting guide from the default user preferences is required.

21. The method of claim 20 , wherein the computer assisted surgery system has a plurality of implant models in memory and includes a set of instructions in memory executable by a processor to generate a bone model of the first bone, and wherein the method further comprises the step of selecting an implant model and determining an optimum position of the implant model on the bone model.

22. The method of claim 21 , wherein the cutting guide is positioned relative to the first bone based on the determined optimum position.

23. The method of claim 21 , further comprising the step of repositioning the cutting guide to one of a plurality of predetermined cut positions corresponding to varying degrees of interference fit between the implant model and the bone model.

24. The method of claim 21 , further comprising the steps of:

resecting the first bone using the cutting guide;

intra-operatively evaluating the quality of the resected first bone; and

selecting one of a plurality of predetermined cut positions corresponding to varying degrees of interference fit between the implant model and the bone model based on the intra-operative evaluation of the resected bone.

25. A computer assisted surgical system for guiding bone cutting operations of an arthroplasty surgery comprising:

a robotic guide to be positioned relative to a bone; and

a memory storing:

a plurality of predetermined cut configurations that corresponds to various degrees of interference fit of a prosthesis on the bone, and

a set of instructions executable by a processor to intra-operatively receive a first selection of one of the plurality of predetermined cut configurations and control the movement of the robotic guide to the first selected predetermined cut configuration.

26. The computer assisted surgical system of claim 25 , further including a set of instructions stored in the memory and executable by the processor to intra-operatively receive a second selection of one of the plurality of predetermined cut configurations and control the movement of the robotic guide to the second selected predetermined cut configuration.

27. The computer assisted surgical system of claim 25 , wherein the robotic guide is a guiding member.

28. The computer assisted surgical system of claim 25 , wherein the robotic guide is an autonomous or haptic robotic guide.

29. The computer assisted surgical system of claim 25 , wherein the robotic guide includes a guiding surface for guiding a cutting tool relative to the bone.

Assignments (7)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 28, 2019
From: PERCEPTION RAISONNEMENT ACTION EN MEDECINE
To: OMNILIFE SCIENCE, INC.
Reel/Frame 049624/0921 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 28, 2019
From: LASALLE, DAVID L.; CIPOLLETTI, GEORGE; CHEAL, EDWARD J.; KNOBLOCH, CARL; PLASKOS, CHRISTOPHER
To: PERCEPTION RAISONNEMENT ACTION EN MEDECINE
Reel/Frame 049623/0203 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Apr 17, 2019
From: DEERFIELD MANAGEMENT COMPANY, L.P., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: OMNI LIFE SCIENCE, INC.
Reel/Frame 048908/0510 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jun 5, 2018
From: OMNI LIFE SCIENCE, INC.
To: DEERFIELD MANAGEMENT COMPANY, L.P.
Reel/Frame 045990/0674 →
FIRST AMENDMENT TO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Sep 29, 2016
From: OMNI LIFE SCIENCE, INC.
To: DEERFIELD PRIVATE DESIGN FUND II, L.P.; DEERFIELD PRIVATE DESIGN INTERNATIONAL II, L.P.
Reel/Frame 040181/0657 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 25, 2016
From: PERCEPTION RAISONNEMENT ACTION EN MEDECINE
To: OMNILIFE SCIENCE, INC.
Reel/Frame 038717/0624 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 15, 2012
From: CHEAL, EDWARD J., MR.; LASALLE, DAVID L., MR.; CIPOLLETTI, GEORGE, MR.; KNOBLOCH, CARL, MR.; PLASKOS, CHRISTOPHER, MR.
To: PERCEPTION RAISONNEMENT ACTION EN MEDECINE
Reel/Frame 028385/0483 →