Content rights protection with arbitrary correlation of second content
View Patent ↗A disclosed content rights management system defines a content usage policy via a conditional rule set contained in metadata. The conditional rule set is correlated to at least one second content. An access control manager determines, dynamically, access rights conferrable to a user device or a server, based on the content usage policy and user history parameters. The embodiments may confer limited access rights for a first activity by a user device, or by a server, with respect to the protected content and the second content, and block a second activity with respect to the protected content and the second content, in response to determining that the request for the second content, in conjunction with the user history parameters, does not comply with the conditional rule set for the second activity.
1. A method of content rights management, the method comprising:
obtaining a conditional rule set defining a content usage policy, the conditional rule set contained in metadata associated with a first content and correlated to at least a second content;
obtaining the second content from a meta-content of the first content, the meta-content including at least one of analysis of the first content, analysis of at least one parameter of the first content, searchable time based reference data associated with the first content, or searchable location based reference data associated with the first content; and
determining, dynamically, access rights based on the content usage policy and user history parameters, in response to determining that a request for the second content, in conjunction with the user history parameters, complies, or does not comply, with the conditional rule set.
2. The method of claim 1 , comprising:
conferring limited access rights for a first activity with respect to the first content and the second content, and blocking a second activity with respect to the first content and the second content, in response to determining that the request for the second content, in conjunction with the user history parameters, does not comply with the conditional rule set for the second activity.
3. The method of claim 1 , comprising:
conferring access rights for the second content, based on the content usage policy and the user history parameters at a first time, in response to determining that the request for the second content, in conjunction with the user history parameters at the first time, complies with the conditional rule set; and
denying access rights for the second content, based on the content usage policy and the user history parameters at a second time, in response to determining that the request for the second content, in conjunction with the user history parameters at the second time, no longer complies with the conditional rule set.
4. The method of claim 2 , where conferring limited access rights for a first activity with respect to the first content and the second content, and blocking a second activity with respect to the first content and the second content, comprises:
conferring access rights for sequential viewing of the first content and the second content; and
blocking editing of the first content and the second content.
5. The method of claim 2 , where conferring limited access rights for a first activity with respect to the first content and the second content, and blocking a second activity with respect to the first content and the second content, comprises:
conferring access rights for viewing of the first content in a first login session and conferring access rights for viewing the second content only in a second login session separate from the first login session; and
blocking editing of the first content and the second content.
6. The method of claim 2 , where conferring limited access rights for a first activity with respect to the first content and the second content, and blocking a second activity with respect to the first content and the second content, comprises:
conferring access rights for sequential viewing of the first content and the second content; and
blocking joining of the first content and the second content to create a third content.
7. The method of claim 3 , comprising:
conferring access rights to view the second content, if the user history parameters at the first time indicate that the first content has previously been viewed by an indicated date; and
denying access rights to view the second content, if the user history parameters at the second time indicate that the second content has not previously been viewed prior to viewing of a third content.
8. An apparatus, comprising:
an access control manager, operative to:
obtain a conditional rule set defining a content usage policy, the conditional rule set contained in metadata associated with a first content and correlated to at least a second content;
obtain the second content from a meta-content of the first content, the meta-content including at least one of analysis of the first content, analysis of at least one parameter of the first content, searchable time based reference data associated with the first content, or searchable location based reference data associated with the first content; and
determine, dynamically, access rights based on the content usage policy and user history parameters, in response to determining that a request for the second content, in conjunction with the user history parameters, complies, or does not comply, with the conditional rule set.
9. The apparatus of claim 8 , where the access control manager is operative to:
confer limited access rights for a first activity with respect to the first content and the second content, and block a second activity with respect to the first content and the second content, in response to determining that the request for the second content, in conjunction with the user history parameters, does not comply with the conditional rule set for the second activity.
10. The apparatus of claim 8 , where the access control manager is operative to:
confer access rights for the second content, based on the content usage policy and the user history parameters at a first time, in response to determining that the request for the second content, in conjunction with the user history parameters at the first time, complies with the conditional rule set; and
deny access rights for the second content, based on the content usage policy and the user history parameters at a second time, in response to determining that the request for the second content, in conjunction with the user history parameters at the second time, no longer complies with the conditional rule set.
11. The apparatus of claim 8 , where the access control manager is operative to confer limited access rights for a first activity with respect to the first content and the second content, and block a second activity with respect to the first content and the second content, by:
conferring access rights for sequential viewing of the first content and the second content; and
blocking editing of the first content and the second content.
12. The apparatus of claim 9 , where the access control manager is operative to confer limited access rights for a first activity with respect to the first content and the second content, and blocking a second activity with respect to the first content and the second content, by:
conferring access rights for viewing of the first content in a first login session and conferring access rights for viewing the second content only in a second login session separate from the first login session; and
blocking editing of the first content and the second content.
13. The apparatus of claim 9 , where the access control manager is operative to confer limited access rights for a first activity with respect to the first content and the second content, and blocking a second activity with respect to the first content and the second content, by:
conferring access rights for sequential viewing of the first content and the second content; and
blocking joining of the first content and the second content to create a mash-up of the first content with the second content.
14. The apparatus of claim 10 , where the access control manager is operative to:
confer access rights to view the second content, if the user history parameters at the first time indicate that the first content has previously been viewed by an indicated date; and
deny access rights to view the second content, if the user history parameters at the second time indicate that the second content has not previously been viewed prior to viewing of a third content.
15. The apparatus of claim 8 , wherein the access control manager resides on a server.
16. The apparatus of claim 8 , wherein the access control manager resides on a user device.
17. A method of content rights management, the method comprising:
conferring, dynamically, access rights to a user device or a server, based on a usage policy, the usage policy defined by a conditional rule set contained in metadata associated with a first content, the conditional rule set correlated to at least a second content; and
obtaining the second content from a meta-content of the first content, the meta-content including at least one of analysis of the first content, analysis of at least one parameter of the first content, searchable time based reference data associated with the first content, or searchable location based reference data associated with the first content.