Assessment of click or traffic quality
View Patent ↗Systems and methods enable displaying an indication of traffic quality. The system retrieves keyword or other traffic data for at least one keyword associated with at least one search engine. The system compares the traffic data for a first time period to the traffic data for a second time period, according to one or more date ranges and other parameters selected by a user for each time period. As a result of the comparison, an indication of the traffic quality associated with a disparity between the first time period data and the second time period data, if any, is displayed.
1. A method comprising:
performing, by one or more computing devices:
retrieving traffic data for a time period, wherein the traffic data for the time period comprises a plurality of metrics including metrics measured before a click and metrics measured after a click;
retrieving traffic data for another time period, wherein the traffic data for the other time period comprises the plurality of metrics;
determining, from the traffic data for the time period and from the traffic data for the other time, disparities between respective values corresponding to one or more of the plurality of metrics; and
determining, based on a threshold value for a metric of the plurality of metrics, that one or more of the disparities between the respective values corresponding to the one or more of the plurality of metrics are indicative of click fraud.
2. The method of claim 1 , wherein said determining whether the one or more disparities between the respective values corresponding to the one or more of the plurality of metrics are indicative of click fraud further comprises:
determining, based on the traffic data for the time period and the traffic data for the other time period, an increase in revenue over ad spend.
3. The method of claim 1 , wherein said determining whether the one or more disparities between respective values corresponding to the one or more of the plurality of metrics are indicative of click fraud further comprises:
determining, based on the traffic data for the time period and the traffic data for the other time period, an increase in impressions without a corresponding increase in click throughs.
4. The method of claim 1 , wherein said determining whether the one or more disparities between respective values corresponding to the one or more of the plurality of metrics are indicative of click fraud further comprises:
determining, based on the traffic data for the time period and the traffic data for the other time period, a significant increase in click throughs.
5. The method of claim 1 , wherein said determining whether the one or more disparities between respective values corresponding to the one or more of the plurality of metrics are indicative of click fraud further comprises:
determining, based on the traffic data for the time period and the traffic data for the other time period, a significant difference in an average ratio of conversions to clicks.
6. The method of claim 1 , wherein said determining whether the one or more disparities between respective values corresponding to the one or more of the plurality of metrics are indicative of click fraud further comprises:
determining, based on the traffic data for the time period and the traffic data for the other time period, a difference between click data from a web analytics server and click data from a search engine.
7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the traffic data is provided by a bid management system.
8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the metrics are selected from a group comprising one or more of revenue over ad spend, impressions, clicks, conversions, and click comparisons.
9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the traffic data is keyword traffic data.
10. The method of claim 1 , further comprising changing the metric of the plurality of metrics in response to user input.
11. The method of claim 1 , further comprising displaying a refinement of the indication of click fraud associated with a keyword.
12. The method of claim 1 , wherein the time period data comprises more than one date range.
13. The method of claim 1 , wherein the other time period data comprises more than one date range.
14. A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing program instructions that when executed by one or more computing devices cause the one or more computer devices to perform:
retrieving keyword traffic data for a time period, wherein the keyword traffic data for the time period comprises a plurality of metrics including metrics measured before a click and metrics measured after a click;
retrieving keyword traffic data for another time period, wherein the keyword traffic data for the other time period comprises the plurality of metrics;
determining, from the keyword traffic data for the time period and from the keyword traffic data for the other time, disparities between respective values corresponding to one or more of the plurality of metrics; and
determining, based on a threshold value for a metric of the plurality of metrics, that one or more of the disparities between the respective values corresponding to the one or more of the plurality of metrics are indicative of click fraud.
15. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 14 , wherein the keyword traffic data is provided by a bid management system.
16. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 14 , wherein the metric of the plurality of metrics is selected from the group consisting of revenue over ad spend, impressions, clicks, conversions, and click comparisons.
17. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 14 , wherein the indication of keyword quality is a traffic quality report comprising the time period data, the other time period data, and a disparity between the time period data and the other time period data corresponding to a traffic quality metric.
18. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 14 , wherein said determining whether the one or more disparities between respective values corresponding to the one or more of the plurality of metrics are indicative of click fraud further comprises:
determining, based on the keyword traffic data for the time period and the keyword traffic data for the other time period, an increase in impressions without a corresponding increase in click throughs.
19. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 14 , wherein said determining whether the one or more disparities between respective values corresponding to the one or more of the plurality of metrics are indicative of click fraud further comprises:
determining, based on the keyword traffic data for the time period and the keyword traffic data for the other time period, a significant increase in click throughs.
20. A system, comprising:
a retrieve module implemented on one or more processors, wherein the retrieve module is configured to:
retrieve traffic data for a time for a time period, wherein the traffic data for the time period comprises a plurality of metrics including metrics measured before a click and metrics measured after a click;
retrieve traffic data for another time, wherein the traffic data for the other time period comprises the plurality of metrics; and
a compare module implemented on one or more processors, wherein the compare module is configured to:
determine, from the traffic data for the time period and from the traffic data for the other time period, disparities between respective values corresponding to one or more of the plurality of metrics, and
determine, based on a threshold value for a metric of the plurality of metrics, that one or more of the disparities between the respective values corresponding to the one or more of the plurality of metrics are indicative of click fraud.